ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Kindle Fire and why 7-inch tablets suck

By | December 6, 2011, 8:04am PST

Summary: Cramming a traditional webpage onto a 7-inch screen doesn’t work.

Amazon’s Kindle Fire Android tablet “offers a disappointingly poor user experience,” claims the Nielsen Norman Group. The main culprit - the 7-inch screen.

Let me offer you a selection of highlights:

  • The most striking observation from testing the Fire is that everything is much too small on the screen, leading to frequent tap errors and accidental activation.
  • One poor guy spent several minutes trying to log in to Facebook, but was repeatedly foiled by accidentally touching the wrong field or button — this on a page with only 2 text fields and 1 button.
  • Using [website] designs intended for a full screen on a 7-inch tablet is like squeezing a size-10 person into a size-7 suit.
  • Kindle users should change their browser preference settings to mobile view.
  • The magazine reading experience could be good but actually is miserable.
  • Screen updates are too slow.
  • Kindle Fire also suffers from plain old bad UI design in many areas.

Nielsen Norman Group’s conclusion:

For 7-inch tablets to succeed, service and content providers must design specifically for these devices. Repurposed designs from print, mobile phones, 10-inch tablets, or desktop PCs will fail, because they offer a terrible user experience. A 7-inch tablet is a sufficiently different form factor that it must be treated as a new platform. Furthermore, these mid-sized tablets are so weak that suboptimal designs — that is, repurposed content — won’t work. Optimize for 7-inch or die.

Are the participants in the test group new to touch screens? No, they’re not. The each had between 1.5 and 2.5 years’ experience of using touchscreen devices with half having used Android phones and the other half having used the iPhone. Exactly the sort of people you’d expect to be interested in a tablet like the Kindle Fire.

In other words, cramming a traditional webpage onto a 7-inch screen doesn’t work. Equally, cramming a mobile website equally doesn’t work. 7-inch is a different animal, and if it’s to succeed content providers are going to have to tweak that content (be it a website or a magazine or an app) to make it work on a 7-inch tablet. The problem is made worse by the fact that the Kindle Fire UI sucks, but that’s something Amazon can fix with a software update. A software update can’t give it a bigger screen.

None of this is a surprise to me.

Will content providers tweak content to suit the Kindle Fire? I think that depends entirely on how well the Kindle Fire does. Until there are millions of them out there (either Kindle Fire devices or 7-inch tablets in general), I don’t see an economic incentive for anyone to be targeting this specific niche.

Kinda makes you wonder why Apple put a 9.7-inch screen on the iPad, and why Apple hasn’t released the long-rumored 7-inch iPad. A tablet with a 7-inch screen is a tablet with a small screen, and a tablet with a small screen is a different animal to a tablet with a big screen.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

78
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

7" is good
tytung 26th Apr
I think you've made some mistakes here and confuses a lot of things:

1. "everything is much too small on the screen, leading to frequent tap errors and accidental activation..."
Then what about smartphones? Isn't everything even smaller?
Anyway, ICS is meant to remedy the UI for different device sizes.

2. "Using [website] designs intended for a full screen on a 7-inch tablet is like squeezing a size-10 person into a size-7 suit..."
"Kindle users should change their browser preference settings to mobile view."

This has nothing to do with device size. The 5" Galaxy Note with resolution 1280x800 can show the FULL desktop
website (not mobile mode) without missing anything! So it's about resolution, not device size.

3. "The magazine reading experience could be good but actually is miserable"
Not if you show one page per screen.

3. "Screen updates are too slow. "
This is due to the weak processor of Kindle Fire. What does this have to do with 7" size???

4. "Kindle Fire also suffers from plain old bad UI design in many areas. "
Again, this is Amazon UI team's problem.

In sum, ICS should remedy the situation of adapting UI to different screen sizes. And DON"T compare 7" to 10".
0 Votes
+ -
Roomie just bought one, and I have to say, for me the 7 inch Fire is pretty sweet. Not too big, or not too small. The widescreen aspect ratio feels nicer too to look at and hold than the monstrous iPad.
@Cylon Centurion: ... than on iPad.

Before releasing iPad, Apple tested versions of this device with many sizes and aspect ratios, so 4:3 10" is the best choice.

The same is with 3.5" screen for iPhone/iPod touch: with this size of the screen, average person can cover over ninety percent of the screen with his/her thump -- hence, no need for second hand most of the time.

With even under 1 cm width increase such as in Samsung Galaxy S 2 phones, people find they have to control the phone with two hands dramatically more often than it would be ergonomically reasonable. And it is less convenient to use as an actual phone, and also does not fit to many pockets without screwing both ergonomic and looks.
0 Votes
+ -
@dderss

Not really. I found most of them to be the same size.
@dderss "..., so 4:3 10" is the best choice." More Apple-think; it's the best choice for CERTAIN USES. You need to leave the mindset that we're all alike, Apple knows our inner selves, and thus if Apple designs one product it will be optimal for all people everywhere.

If your primary use is to watch widescreen television shows and movies on train commutes, for instance, 4:3 is not going to be the best choice. It all depends on what your planned uses are.
0 Votes
+ -
@dderss What are you making this stuff up. Throwing some so called ergonomic and "aspect ratios" numbers out there, and that's suppose to make it a fact. It's what the user likes, and is comfortable with, that counts.
@dderss You quote the study at: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/kindle-fire-usability.html I'll just copy the reply I made yesterday about the so called study below.
"Amazon's Kindle Fire Android tablet offers a disappointingly poor user experience, claims the Nielsen Norman Group." Yah, some group. You forgot to mention that 4 people were involved in the study. The group adds this disclaimer, "This was a small study, with only four users, but qualitative studies often generate deeper insights than bigger, more metrics-focused quantitative studies." You also forgot to mention that this same group has/ had a business relationship with Apple. At the very end of this group's study they add in smaller type, "By way of full disclosure, Apple is one of the companies that has sent the most attendees to my Usability Week conference in recent years, though I don't think this influenced my analysis". Some study. Fan Boys? You be the judge.
0 Votes
+ -
@dderss Yeah...they didn't do all the testing you claim. They did some in-house testing with a select focus group. Not nearly representative of the population in general. Get your facts straight.
@dderss I know I prefer the 10" screen. I have an iphone and some spots I have to enlarge the screen to hit an Apply button. I thought about a fire but worried about a 7" screen. While I can't afford an iPad I did buy a touchpad. Works perfectly for what I want.
0 Votes
+ -
@dderss Give me a break, because Apple says that 10" 4:3 is the "correct" tablet form factor then it must be true? Man are you an obvious Kool aide drinker. I've had a Nook Color for about 6 months now and I think the 7" form factor is far superior to the iPad for just about anything. If I wanted a 10" form factor Tablet I'd buy a Samsung Galaxy Tab or an ASUS Eee pad Transformer before an iPad2.
@dderss
I watch a ton of videos and read lots of comics on my Acer Iconia, and the function size is way better than iPad for these tasks. I mean to each its own, iPhone screen is way too small. I still use an iPod touch , but if I can get the app on both platforms I tend to go android, just because of the better screen size. Apple is overrated, I stuck by them in the beginning but Android is where its at right now!!
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion - I agree, in my opinion a 7" screen is the absolute maximum for any device that pretends to be portable - the iPad is far too large. Yes, typing on a 7" device is awkward at first, but I have found that if you change your typing technique the results become a lot more acurate. A touch pad will never be a substitute for a keyboard on any device. I am thrilled with the useability of the Fire. I admit that the default white screen on the reader has too much glare, but replace it with the off white background and it is almost as good as the paper white screen of the old Kindle. In short, I think Adrian is talking through his rear end on this subject.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Kindle Fire and why 7-inch tablets suck
deeviousgenius Updated - 5th Jan
@Cylon Centurion Haha, I like the term used here "monstrous iPad".

Actually, this whole conversation was quite entertaining. Really, no one is essentially right. If you're happy with 7 inches, be happy with it. Some like it big. Like women in the bedroom. But that's beside the point.

I'm personally happy with the size of the iPad. It's a great size. I would often go to electronic stores and play with the 7 inch tablets, have a gander at them. I kinda think their too small for what I want. If I only read novels and stuff on it, 7 inches works fine (it is technically the size of some novels and books) but for magazines? It just wasn't fun. I constantly had to pinch and fiddle with the screen, the reading experience destroyed to having a man look like he has teret's and is trying to pick all the dust off his screen.

I think the point of the article shouldn't be "7 inch sucks hairy monkey balls" but more so "7 inch is a niche market". Cause it really is. It's like having an argument with a guy who owns a 17 inch laptop (which really is a portable desktop...) to a guy who owns a small 13 inch netbook. They would both have differing needs to the other. But how many people own a netbook compared to others who own a say 15 inch laptop? Again, even netbooks is a somewhat niche (and dying?) market. My mother would die on a 13 inch netbook. Whereas I'm fine using one. So it all comes down to the user's requirements.

So Apple fans, relax. Apple was the first in the market, and has a powerful foothold in it. Just be glad it's finally here. I was waiting for a decent tablet from Microsoft for YEARS and they never delivered anything of worth. Stop trying to argue for Apple. Their already doing well with or without your comments.
0 Votes
+ -
As impressive as it was to see a fully-rendered website on an iPhone 5 years ago, the zooming and scrolling required to actually read a full website is a UX disaster. Apple tried to cover it up by announcing a "designed for iPhone" website specification, but phones were doing this years earlier with CSS for mobile, RSS, custom mobile pages (m.domainname.com), and WAP.
@Joe_Raby Except that there were NO iPhones 5 years ago. And just because there were sites designed for mobile browsers, didn't mean that those mobile devices didn't suck for actually reading those sites. My flip phone from 2005 had web capabilities, but I never activated it because the interface sucked. My sister has two-year-old Samsung Symbian "smartphone" that sucks so badly in accessing the web that I don't know why she bothers to have a data plan. My mother bought the same phone and doesn't use the web features at all. They all use my iPhone without me showing them how, though. Websites optimized for desktop viewing ARE a UX nightmare on the iPhone (or its copy Android), but simply unusable on pre-iOS "smartphones".
@ssaha ----- Ok, 4 1/2 years ago. Big deal.
I have a 7" Nook Color, rooted with an N2A card. It's a different UI, so I can't speak to that, but most of the time I'm pretty happy with the presentation on the 7" screen (the Nook has an excellent screen, which helps).

But you're right about the display of certain login screens - it's *very* frustrating sometimes. Sometimes I've been able to enlarge the view, but then you have to move around to find the elements, or they disappear when you bring up the keyboard. I've had to re-attempt login several times, taking many minutes, too many times! For other stuff, though, the screen has been fine. I do sometimes wish it was bigger, but then I do sometimes find myself liking the small size. Can't have everything!

An update can't give these devices bigger screens, but as time goes by, I hope the sites and apps themselves will begin to optimize for the 7" screen.
@nobby57 Nah; the original idea of a web browser was to adapt the content to the specs/limitations of the device it's running on. That's why in theory you should be able to browse the web from a PC, a smartphone or a VAX terminal. In this case, what's needed are more intelligent browsers that do their jobs correctly and reformat the content to more appropriately display on the small screen.
0 Votes
+ -
Everybody has to have something to b*tch about else who would buy their crappy articles? Sorry. I just got a Kindle Fire for my birthday and I love it. Hands down. It *would* be nice to have a built in camera. But I have a good one in my Android Bionic phone so I'm not too out of luck there. But the Fire is a very nice tablet with everything I need and more in a package that fits in my inside jacket pocket. Not everything is going to be perfect for everyone. Why don't you qualify your limited view as just that? "IMHO" is a standard disclaimer in all web commentary. But yours doesn't seem to be so "H". Maybe Kindle sales will change your mind after a year on the market as it soars above others with the very attractive $200 price tag and the blazing fast Android OS. Ah, well. I'll still be enjoying it everywhere I go. Thank you, very much.

A satisfied Kindle customer.
@joejustice@... Agreed, this article is Flamebait.
Tablet size is a personal preference depending partly on what you use the device for. Someone who is primarily going to do book reading, few games, and a bit of web browsing can probably get by fine. If you plan to do extensive web browsing it might be a bit of a struggle depending on the size of your hands. I've seen people tapping away on phones that I consider too small for much of anything. Again, personal preference.

I always laugh at the "this product sucks" or "that format is dead" declarations. The more sensible review of a product is that it doesn't work for the person reviewing it. Declaring it sucks should be reserved for the truly broken/not working devices, not something you just don't personally prefer.
0 Votes
+ -
Totally backwards
x I'm tc 6th Dec
Just try using an iPad on a bus or a train and you will see why 10" slates suck. 7" is soooooooo much better.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Kindle Fire and why 7-inch tablets suck
msalzberg Updated - 6th Dec
@jdakula

I use my iPad on the train nearly every day. Can you tell me in what way it's soooooo bad?
0 Votes
+ -
@jdakula iPad here with 3g!!! imagine that. I use it every day in the bus!! fast connection too, of course I hate paying ATT sad
0 Votes
+ -
@jdakula
I've used an iPad on the bus. It was a good experience for me.
@msalzberg, Hasam1991, DannyO_0x98

Standing or Crowded? Now imagine yourselves again holding a 10" tablet then imagine holding a 7" that just do everything that you actually do with a tablet given the scenario.
0 Votes
+ -
@Papapau

In a crowded NYC subway, you don't find many people using tablets of any size while standing. On my commuter train, I use it while sitting or standing. I know that's not the answer you want. Sorry.
You gotta be kidding me. Who did they test the kindle with, did the test group have apposable thumbs?
My 5 y.o. grandson has mastered it. In fact I can't get it away from him so I am buying two more. It is the perfect size to carry around and is quick to refresh. Oh, and sturdy too. It has been dropped many times and still keeps ticking.
@mavnick1
So what you're saying is 7" is the perfect size for 5 y.o. fingers? (I think that's what the testers were saying, too.)
0 Votes
+ -
@rynning

The problem is that the tests obviously weren't conducted properly. If the people doing the testing weren't even aware that pinch to zoom was available, how is it a fair test?
I really don't buy the idea of 7-inch tablets that suck. Especially Kindle Fire. I have one. I also own a 10 inch slate Acer Iconia A500 and for portability, I like the Fire way better. Of course one can argue that the Fire doesn't have bluetooth, camera or GPS, but I wasn't looking for that when I bought it. I entered into the purchase with the idea of an e-reader, which is what its main purpose is. Everything else in my mind, is just gravy.
0 Votes
+ -
@sadalius +1. I had a Nook Color and sold it to upgrade to the A500. There isn't anything wrong with the A500 except it is just not portable enough. I have a netbook so why carry around a tablet that is almost as heavy and bulky? The Nook was always at my side if I needed to look something up or do a little reading.
0 Votes
+ -
This article is ridiculous. I have a Fire and I read magazines on it. It is fine as the zoom is easy to use. Ditto for most web pages. And apparently tapping is easy on phones and iPads, but not 10" screens. I suppose you can decry the crappy experience of an iPad with its dinky 10" screen and an iPhone or any screen that is less than a 20" widescreen. Why stop there? The experience would be even better on a 27" screen.
@bobfastner

The magazine experience on the Fire was something that was heavily criticized, way before this usability study was done. As a test I tried pinching and zooming on a few of the magazines text on the Fire to get it to a readable size. No-go, just blurry small text.
Perhaps the better, more accurate title for this article is "Kindle Fire and why 7-inch tablets suck at web browsing". The predictable Fanboy response defending the KF seems to be all about its size as opposed to 10" tablets (no argument there, smaller IS smaller) or its utility as an eReader (though since it has a glossy LCD screen rather than an eInk screen, the Kindle fanboys can no longer trot out "it works in Bright Sunlight!" talking point). Yet none of them refutes the central point of the article, that the UI of desktop browser-optimized web pages is painful to use on tablets that have a touch interface and a much smaller display area than a 15"+ monitor can provide. Unless your hands are tiny, 10" is probably the smallest screen size that can let you use touch on a thousand-pixel page without too much in the way of errors- I can usually get by on an iPad on most web pages, though even there my fingers are too large for some fine-print links without zooming. On a tablet with half the real estate of the iPad, I would tear my hair out (whatever is left of it) trying to fill out many web forms.
@ssaha
You have a point about the web-browsing experience vs the tablet size, and I mostly agree with what you wrote.

As far as fanboyism goes, however... I have neither an iPad or an Android tablet, but from what I've read on these forums, I'd say Apple fanboys are the loudest bigots.
@luke_sg

+1
@luke_sg Right on. +1
0 Votes
+ -
@ssaha

7" tablets don't totally suck at Web browsing. It depends on the page. (And no, I'm not just talking about mobile versions. Mobile versions suck on pretty much any device, because mobile pages suck.)

The complaints about the browser UI (as opposd to the page) have nothing to do with the size of the device. It wouldn't've killed the designers to make the buttons on the browser or the Kindle Fire's UI a litle bit larger. Having said that, the idea that the size of the tablet effects how well you could do on the Facebook sign-in page is silly. Just like every other self-respecting mobile browser, you can zoom in on the page in the Silk browser. It's difficult for me to understand how someone could have a hard time logging in to the Facebook page when there's nothing else to see on it. You can zoom in all you want. You're not going to miss anything.
0 Votes
+ -
"Amazon's Kindle Fire Android tablet offers a disappointingly poor user experience, claims the Nielsen Norman Group." Yah, some group. You forgot to mention that 4 people were involved in the study. The group adds this disclaimer, "This was a small study, with only four users, but qualitative studies often generate deeper insights than bigger, more metrics-focused quantitative studies." You also forgot to mention that this same group has/ had a business relationship with Apple. At the very end of this group's study they add in smaller type, "By way of full disclosure, Apple is one of the companies that has sent the most attendees to my Usability Week conference in recent years, though I don't think this influenced my analysis". Some study. Fan Boys? You be the judge.
@tucfjg --Ha!
0 Votes
+ -
@tucfjg

Wow... That explains it.

That means this "study" is worthless. I usually have great respect for Adrian's articles. I'd have to say I'm disappointed that he's used such BS for this article.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't think they suck, I have one Kindle Fire and actually is really portable, I have a Xoom also and big format screen is uncomfortable sometimes.

I don't think is a bad user experience, actually any cellphone has a smaller screen and some of them are really great.

This is kind of media manipulation by the fruit company.
+1. This is one of the posts I totally agree with you.
0 Votes
+ -
In my experience on the Fire, missed buttons are not due to the screen size but to "fuzzy" touch response. I notice the difference web surfing but you can really see it by playing Plants vs. Zombies on the Fire. I miss entire lawn squares on the Fire much more often than I do on the iPhone and the squares on the Fire are huge by iPhone standards. I don't know if that's a visual quirk or an issue with the touch response itself but I suspect the latter. It's a fairly common experience to find I've "clicked" on the Fire touchscreen without ever touching the glass.

Only someone who is judging by specs rather than performance (or someone who owns only a truly crappy Android phone for comparison) would call the Fire "blazing fast". Response is not awful but certainly not as fast or as smooth as either the iPhone or iPad.

And yes, I find the user interface clunky.

So do I hate the Kindle Fire and regret having bought one? Not a bit. The usability glitches occur at a tolerable level given what I use it for and it cost me $200. It's a nice size for reading books and perfect for me for watching videos and Amazon makes acquiring both those things on the Fire very easy, significantly easier than iTunes. The iPhone is usable for both books (I use the Kindle Reader app) and videos but I find the iPad too heavy and awkward for either. The iPad is, of course, much better for content creation. The Fire is also the perfect size for many games although the selection is currently thin. I've played Settlers of Catan for many hours on my iPhone but would switch to the Fire at the drop of a hat if they made it available there.
Reading over the article, I found some problems other than the fact that his "study" is based on FOUR people.

1. ??His issue with fat fingers and difficultly selecting fields on normal websites. ??

If the users he chose do not know the absolute basics of a how to use a touch screen device, such as zooming in with a reverse pinch, ??then of course they are going to have problems. ??It is VERY damning for his credibility that he does not know such a basic concept of almost all modern touch screen interfaces. ??At least they knew to use their fingers and not their nose to navigate.

2. It's heavy. ??Compare to what? ??This is a fundamental problem with his article. ??He compares the Fire to both the original Kindle and the iPad, but only when it makes the Fire look bad. ??When it comes to weight, he compares it to the original Kindle, when it comes to screen size he compares it to the iPad. ??Why doesn't he compare it to a desktop 28" monitor as well for screen size as well? ??

3. Screen updates are slow. ??This is a problem, but he seems not to know the first thing about Android CPUs when he says??"the Fire is supposed to have a fast CPU." ??In fact, the fire has a very old 1 GHz single core CPU. ??I expect this to be updated on future versions and this problem eliminated.

4. He??criticizes??the 7" form factor, but doesn't mention that things are just as bad on a 10" tablet such as "highlighting feedback for touching a button is so small that your finger usually covers it". ??The same could be said about the back button on the iPad Safari browser, for example, and every smart phone ever made including the iPhone. ??Doesn't seem to be a problem for every other form factor. ??So why is this a problem for the 7" tablet.

5. He states "The lack of physical buttons for turning the page also impedes on the reading experience for fiction." This is purely a personal preference. I actually like swiping as it is more like turning the pages of a book and gives a brief rest for your eyes as you turn the page.

These are just a few examples and leads me to believe this expert has written an amateurish evaluation.
0 Votes
+ -
@gwlaw99 The Kindle Fire has a dual-core CPU, not single core.
0 Votes
+ -
Fat Finger Guys
Yortis Kavortis 6th Dec
It does not suck, that is a fat-fingered claim. It is not necessary to design web pages "for" the Kindle Fire any more than it is necessary to design them for, say, netbooks. And "mobile sites" are so two weeks ago. Haven't Nielsen Norman Group heard of responsive design? The new HTML/CSS frameworks enable a design that works on any mobile device, and on my Kindle Fire they look sweet. You are right that there is no incentive to target for this (or any other) specific niche. Nor is the device too heavy to hold comfortably for long periods, quite unlike the iPad! As to the UI, it is mostly Android and pleasant to use. Some of the UI widgets could be made a bit larger, but Amazon has already made UI improvements in the latest OS update and I expect more. Certainly the screen size is not a barrier to improved UI. And the Kindle 8 Format, recently announced but not yet available, should dramatically improve magazine publishing for the device. Tapping the screen does not "disrupt reading enjoyment," for crying out loud. About the only annoying issue is that the screensaver and login do not retain the user's preferred screen orientation.
0 Votes
+ -
@Yortis Kavortis

I haven't noticed any UI changes with the update. What kind of changes have there been? The only thing I've noticed is increased speed.
0 Votes
+ -
7" is good
tytung 26th Apr
I think you've made some mistakes here and confuses a lot of things:

1. "everything is much too small on the screen, leading to frequent tap errors and accidental activation..."
Then what about smartphones? Isn't everything even smaller?
Anyway, ICS is meant to remedy the UI for different device sizes.

2. "Using [website] designs intended for a full screen on a 7-inch tablet is like squeezing a size-10 person into a size-7 suit..."
"Kindle users should change their browser preference settings to mobile view."

This has nothing to do with device size. The 5" Galaxy Note with resolution 1280x800 can show the FULL desktop
website (not mobile mode) without missing anything! So it's about resolution, not device size.

3. "The magazine reading experience could be good but actually is miserable"
Not if you show one page per screen.

3. "Screen updates are too slow. "
This is due to the weak processor of Kindle Fire. What does this have to do with 7" size???

4. "Kindle Fire also suffers from plain old bad UI design in many areas. "
Again, this is Amazon UI team's problem.

In sum, ICS should remedy the situation of adapting UI to different screen sizes. And DON"T compare 7" to 10".

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix