Mozilla plans to "Ribbonize" Firefox

Summary: Mozilla has unveiled plans to "ribbonize" Firefox 3.7 for Windows Vista and Windows 7 in an attempt to reduce on-screen clutter and free up screen real estate.

Mozilla has unveiled plans to "ribbonize" Firefox 3.7 for Windows Vista and Windows 7 in an attempt to reduce on-screen clutter and free up screen real estate.

Mozilla announced that "starting with Vista, and continuing with Windows 7, the menu bar is going away" and will "be replaced with things like the Windows Explorer contextual strip, or the Office Ribbon."

Here are a couple of mock-ups:

It's also interesting to note that Mozilla has been quick to dismiss suggestions that the move is an attempt to copy Chrome, IE or Safari:

We are not trying to make Firefox look like any other browser. Firefox is Firefox. Similarities between browsers are unavoidable. They all have shared lineage and are ... all trying to solve the same problems, so evolutionary ideas that are similar are inevitable."

Mozilla has a number of ideas for simplifying and clarifying the Firefox UI, but given that Chrome, IE and Safari have all made significant UI improvements, this move by Mozilla feels reactionary. The Mozilla UI revamp is long overdue and we're only seeing it now because Firefox is feeling the pressure from other browsers.

Another interesting point is that these improvements will only apply to Firefox for Windows, which means that Firefox on other platforms will have a significantly different user interface.

Firefox 3.7, currently scheduled for release in March 2010.

Topic: Browser

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

69 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • whew

    I almost was worried for a few but then you said its not changing on other platforms :) Thankfully Linux is still safe from the atrocity of the ribbon.
    JT82
    • atrocity?

      atrocity? Why do you think it is an atrocity?
      CobraA1
      • The ribbon was an awful idea.

        yes granted MS implemente it - but it just took the familiar and made it a pain in the rear to learn. The ribbon is unintuitive and just eats up screen real estate. Give me classic menus please!
        JT82
        • sigh . . .

          "but it just took the familiar and made it a
          pain in the rear to learn."

          Well, it took the familiar and changed it.
          Yeah, it reintroduced a bit of a learning curve
          into Office.

          But IMHO, it ends up being better after the
          learning curve. While it's a bit of a pain for
          current users, it's better for new users who
          may be confused by the menus and toolbars,
          which themselves had grown quite complex.

          If you want, you can double click on the tabs,
          which minimizes them and gives you a lot more
          screen space. That's probably a feature
          Microsoft didn't give enough visibility to.
          CobraA1
          • agree with you

            nt
            shellcodes_coder
          • Agreed..

            It took some time getting used to, but at least now most features are visible in the various ribbon tabs. I still use an older version at work and it does highlight how outdated the classic menu system is for applications with so many features.
            Mike (not Cox)
          • I guess I'm the only one who doesn't see an advantage

            I don't see any advantage to the ribbon. It strikes me as cumbersome. Many tools are not where Microsoft has traditionally placed them, costing me time while I search for them.

            If you're one of the eighteen people on the planet who had never used Office before, the ribbon is probably easier to learn than the original menus. I've been using the Office apps since they were sold individually and not bundled together, and the ribbon does nothing for me. Sure, I can learn to use it, but I don't see what the advantages are. Why bury 'Save' and 'Print' under that 'button'? Those are the two activities I do most. It makes saving more difficult than the old toolbar icon, and saving is one thing many people don't do often enough; why make it harder?

            That's not to say it's a bad idea for Firefox. A browser is a much simpler tool to use than a spreadsheet, with less toolbar interaction. That said, I don't think current layout wastes much real estate. Just don't lock everything in place like IE 7 / 8 does.
            CharlieSpencer_Palmetto
          • Some explanations, and some changes in Office 2010

            "Many tools are not where Microsoft has
            traditionally placed them"

            Largely because Microsoft decided to position
            them based on how often people use them, rather
            than "traditional" placement. The "paste"
            command is on the left and is made big because
            it's the most commonly used command.

            Yes, it's going to require a bit of a
            retraining period - but the hope is that it's
            only temporary and that people will get used to
            the new system.

            "If you're one of the eighteen people on the
            planet who had never used Office before"

            How about kids learning to use a computer for
            the first time?

            The computer industry has always been, to some
            degree, trying to get rid of the old and bring
            in new stuff. One of the most common phrases I
            hear from the ZDNet tech editors is often how
            people are somehow "Luddites" when they stick
            to old stuff.

            Techies love new, shiny stuff and complain when
            people stick with old stuff. Right now
            especially, the techies have latched onto web
            2.0 stuff and absolutely detest anybody who is
            still using regular apps (even if regular apps
            still make sense in many cases).

            I'm not saying it's right, and I'm not saying
            it's reasonable - I'm just saying that's the
            way it is, and Microsoft is definitely feeling
            the pressure to keep coming up with new stuff.

            My own philosophy is to use the best tool for
            the best job - if you don't want to go through
            a retraining period, then go ahead and use the
            old Office. It still works.

            . . . although be aware that Office 2007 does
            work for a lot of people, and a lot of people
            are willing to retrain if it means they'll be
            more productive in the long term.

            "Why bury 'Save' and 'Print' under that
            'button'?"

            It's the new "File" menu. And they're making it
            a tab in the ribbon and even calling it "File"
            again in the Office 2010. In fact, that
            particular featureis getting a complete
            overhaul in Office 2010.

            http://blogs.technet.com/office2010/

            . . . and Save should be on the Quick Access
            toolbar by default (and you can put print there
            as well if you want).

            . . . and oh, yeah - the most recent posting in
            the Office 2010 blog is about forgetting to
            save documents and what they're doing about it
            in Office 2010!
            CobraA1
          • The ribbon just stunk! Period!

            The ribbon STUNK! It made me skip completely. It was a pain in the butt to use. I like my menu positions to be consistent and available at all times! I don't need things hidden from me because I'm not in the right context. That's what right clicking is for. I guess I may end up a Chrome user after all...
            frankz00
          • I agree....

            a picture says a thousand words or can mean
            1000 things. How about text to explain what
            things are?! Example say for example you work
            for me and do multiple things i just give you
            pictures to show you what to do. I give you a
            picture of baby clothes on a hanger. What is it
            I want you to do? Do I want you to do laundry?
            Do i want you dress the baby? Do i want you to
            sort the baby clothes for donation? All of the
            above could be true. Someone learning using the
            picture idea microsoft is shoving down peoples
            throats is a bad idea remove the pict put text
            to explain what is what.
            dougogd@...
          • Actually...

            The ribbon interface came about because Microsoft got tired of reading suggestions from end users for features - that were already IN the current version of Office - and may have already been available in the previous TWO versions of Office. The idea with the ribbon is to make things EASIER to find and use.
            Wolfie2K3
        • The ribbon is better...

          ...than file menus. Sure, it takes some while to get used to but then I suppose it took horse riders some time to get used to cars.

          Guess which is generally preferred now?
          Sleeper Service
          • 'Better' is relative.

            What do you find to be better about it? I'm not saying it's bad, just that I haven't found any advantages. Enlighten me.
            CharlieSpencer_Palmetto
        • Agreed!!!

          The ribbon is the WORST idea for program interface as well as a huge screen space waster, IMO. This is more of the "lemming" mentality at work. If M$ does it, it must be good. Hogwash! M$ does not have the monopoly on good ideas. Some of them are just awful.

          At least on one application I use at work, there is the option to use a "classic" interface with traditional menus and toolbars and turn off the ever changing AND confusing "ribbon".

          Users of Firefox don't deserve this thrust upon them. I know I won't be very happy, as I only use other browsers when necessary for compatibility. Incorporation of the ribbon may change my preference for Firefox to some other browser. They aren't the only player in the market.
          n0oeg
          • Total concurance! n/t

            n/t
            btljooz
        • I agree

          I recently bought a new laptop that had the MS 2007 Office package and yes, the ribbon learning curve was frustrating as I was trying update my resume and I am 'old school'...but after while I got used to the 'ribbon'.
          rainzy
          • RE-learning things is a waste of time and

            agreeing to put up with such by doing so is enabling software vendors to foist us all into a 'Sheeple State'. :|
            btljooz
          • Not everybody thinks so.

            Not everybody thinks it's a waste of time,
            especially if it ends up being a better
            solution.

            They will improve it more in Office 2010 - some
            things like the orb [i]were[/i] a bit of a
            mistake, and they're going back to the File
            menu there.

            . . . and nobody's being a sheeple. That's a
            poor metaphor, and paints a business with broad
            strokes, ignoring that there are actually
            people working at Microsoft.
            CobraA1
        • I wholeheartedly concur...

          Just because something is the "latest, 'greatest'" doesn't mean it's in deed BETTER!
          btljooz
          • Yup.

            Yup, and that's why Office 2010 is bringing back
            the File menu :).

            Well, technically it's part of the ribbon now, and
            it's not really a menu - but they [b]are[/b]
            getting rid of that orb.
            CobraA1