NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
Summary: Chip maker NVIDIA saw a massive GPU market share slide during Q1 '11 according to estimates released by graphics research and consulting firm Jon Peddie Research.
Chip maker NVIDIA saw a massive GPU market share slide during Q1 '11 according to estimates released by graphics research and consulting firm Jon Peddie Research.
The estimates show NVIDIA sliding over 28 percent, year-on-year. Where there are losers, there are winners. Jon Peddie Research predicts that AMD has seen its market share by over 15 percent, while Intel has seem a market share growth of just under 10 percent.
Not only has NVIDIA slid well into third place, if this latest data is correct, NVIDIA is rapidly sliding out of the game. Sure, it has been a tough quarter for the PC sector, with shipments slipping 5.4 percent, but a slid of this magnitude means that NVIDIA has problems.
So, what's gone wrong at NVIDIA? Well, the company did have that GPU overheating debacle back in 2008, which shook OEM and consumer confidence. Then NVIDIA got ousted from Apple hardware (which was bad for NVIDIA because while the PC market was shrinking, Apple was experiencing a growth spurt).
NVIDIA needs to regroup before its market share slides even further.
[UPDATE: This in from an NVIDIA spokesperson:
The topline report only covers overall graphics shipments, which is no longer a relevant metric for NVIDIA since we exited the chipset business. Jon Peddie and Dean McCarron of Mercury Research both indicate that the reason for NVIDIA's decline in overall share is simply because we no longer compete for integrated graphics.
NVIDIA competes in the discrete graphics market, where we remain the market leader with more than 50% market share. We have a strong position in the desktop market, particularly in the high-margin segments, where our DX11 desktop GPUs are experiencing rapid growth. In discrete notebook graphics, we're at the beginning of a significant share gain, as the industry transitions to Sandy Bridge.
It's a fair point, but it still doesn't convince me, and here's why. First off, integrated graphics are in because integrated means cheap and right now cheap sells. Integrated will become even more important as AMD and Intel increasingly make "GPUs on the CPU' a norm. This still leaves room for discrete, but that sector will undoubtedly shrink.
Another issue here is that I see the discrete GPU market shrinking as the gaming PC (which needs a new graphics card at least once a year if you want to keep up) gives further ground to the games console. Relying of discrete graphics, in particular high-end, high margin is dangerous when money is tight and consoles are cheap.]
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
What about no X86 related devices ?
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
Exactly, with AMD and Intel squeezing them out by making chipsets with embeded video, ARM/tablet/Android is a smart and perhaps only growth area for them.
I don't buy computers without NVIDIA graphics anymore because they are the only ones that have never given me fits with drivers. I'm not a gamer so the bleeding edge is not important to me.
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
Regarding these numbers, they exactly reflect the fact that NVIDIA only competes in discreet graphics now. These numbers don't worry me a bit. When I buy another graphics card, it will be NVIDIA. If you look, the AMD numbers also reflect their new affiliation with Apple as an integrated chipset supplier. NVIDIA still owns discreet.
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
For good video and 3D performance on Linux, NVIDIA is the only choice.
Unfortunately for NVIDIA, the $35 GeFoce 210 is more than adequate, taking full advantage of their binary driver and VDPAU.
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
Yup, ATI could learn a lot from these guys. NVIDIA was always a easier more stable solution. ATI/AMD was always problematic for me.
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
So is the data above, false?
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
"I also always buy computers and devices making sure they have Nvidia GPUs in them, because of their superior,crystal clear image reproduction."
Well now, there's a bias if I ever saw one.
Really, the "image reproduction" quality of AMD vs NVIDIA, is for all intents and purposes, equivalent. Any minute differences that could be found, if any, would be academic at best and is nothing anybody would notice under normal usage patterns.
I agree though that this article has a negative slant and probably does not show the whole picture concerning NVidia operations.
BMW must be "BIAS" as well...
best wishes....
If you really believe Nvidia is above criticism...
Well, what did they expect?
Overheating Debacle "Shook Confidence"???
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
Hey, they're smarter than RIM
They've built a nice little business for themselves making ARM chips, and they're well-positioned to make integrated CPU+GPU offerings for the mobile market. Their alternative was to sit there and die, so if in the short run they take a hit while they flesh out their mobile offerings, so be it.
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide
RE: NVIDIA suffers massive GPU market share slide