MS has to be able to defend this to the EU. By pointing out that this is meant to be a very basic package and that 3rd party AV vendors can show that, for money, they offer a better product, then everyone wins. Windows is safer by default and if you want more whizbang features, 3rd party AV vendors are there to provide them.
I'd also like to add that for me, this is actually perfect. I want basic protection with a UI I never have to look at unless something is wrong. For me, MSE is perfect and better than the AVG I just uninstalled.
Yesterday I downloaded the installation files for Microsoft Security Essentials beta, Microsoft’s free consumer antimalware program. So, is it any good?
Check out the Microsoft Security Essentials installation and UI gallery
Well, so far I’ve got as far as downloading the files, installing the application on a couple of test machines (You don’t think I’m brave/crazy enough to roll this out on production machines, do you?), set it up and thrown a few test viruses at the app. So far, so good, but I’ve still got a lot of questions:
- What’s stability like?
- How quickly will the app respond to new threats?
- How much of a performance hit is the app on systems, especially when running scans?
- How long until hackers start busting holes in the app?
- What will other security vendors make of it?
These and more questions will be answered at some point in the future …
So far though, so good. Microsoft Security Essentials seems pretty primitive (no email integration, for example), and I’m surprised it doesn’t integrate better with Windows Firewall. That said, basic antimalware software is much better than none at all, so it’s hard to complain about it.
By the way, if you haven’t downloaded the installation files for Microsoft Security Essentials beta, you’ve missed the boat now because Microsoft closed the door on downloads.
