Samsung teased us yesterday with its plans to release … drumroll please … a tablet, no sorry, slate. Introducing the Galaxy Tab.
The teaser video didn’t give much away … there’s mention of “augmented reality,” “full web browsing,” “video call,” “HD movie play,” “PC link web,” “e-reading,” “navigation,” “video calling,” “Android 2.2″ and it mentions the “portable” 7-inch screen.
What can we get from this, well, we can assume that there’s going to be a video camera (maybe two), a GPS, and a high-density screen. We have no idea as to processors and storage capacity (or more accurately, tech pundits are full of nothing but ideas here …).
Two things bug me about the Galaxy Tab though. First, the screen. 7-inch puts it in-between the Dell Streak with its 5-inch screen and the iPad with it’s 9.7-inch. But then the Streak is a smartphone too, so it has to be even more portable in that sense.
Then there’s potential pricing. A contract-free Streak will set you back $550, while one tied to a 2-year AT&T shackle costs $300. iPad starts at $499. This really doesn’t give Samsung much wriggle-room at all on pricing.
So here are three questions worth pondering:
Poll
How much would you pay for the Samsung Galaxy Tab?
Poll
What are your thoughts on the 7-inch screen?
Poll
Is the Samsng Galaxy Tab a serious competitor to the iPad
All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.
Biography
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.
Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.
Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.
@Droid101 there are many more use cases for an ipad than watching videos. for a lot of other situations (internet, mail, ebooks, magazins) 4:3 is better suited.
It's a weird size. Don't really see where the focus is, and not knowing the price doesn't help.
If it's cheap and they have for example, games well, maybe. Clearly this is going to have something like "Layers" and/or "Google Goggles" - but seems a little large for that.
I can't see it working for video calling. I know we're all supposed to be video calling all the time now. But actually can you imagine being in a public place having a video chat with someone? No, really? If you're at home won't you use your PC for this? I really don't see it.
@James Quinn on who you ask. The Apple crowd always claims sales and usage are meaningless when it comes to computers (as Apple lags far behind MS) but are the end-all-be-all when it comes to iPod/touch/phone So the metric of success will move accordingly in Apples favor regardless of sales...
@mdemuth but I've never claimed that market share is the end all to be all. What is important to any company of course is PROFIT. If Macintosh does not have a commanding market share but makes Apple huge money in terms of margins and profit they hey it's all good. As for the iPod well market share in this case is not the end all to be all but if anything just the icing on the cake. What is still true for the Macintosh is true for the iPod margins and profit especially when you consider the added bonus of music sales and in the case of the iTouch movies, TV shows and apps. Same for the iPhone that thing makes money for Apple in any number of ways including a piece of every contract sold by AT&T.
So for this device sales will be a factor but only "IF" they make some real money off of selling it.
@mdemuth The only numbers that really mean anything in a business are revenue numbers. It doesn't matter how many units are moved if they're not making any money for the company. You can move a lot of units through BOGO as RIM does and Android smartphone carriers do, but so what. You're only succeeding in cutting your profit in half which isn't a great business model, no matter how you look at it. Nearly everything that Apple does, goes directly into Apple's pockets. There's no watering down of revenue and profits. Even iTMS is considered break-even, not a loss. In the end, companies have to please their shareholders and at the same time please their customers. Apple is managing to do this well where many companies aren't even coming close to pleasing either shareholders or customers.
The iPad is too big to fit into a small bag or big pocket. This would be about the same size as a paperback book. The iPad is just to big for carrying around without a briefcase or backpack.
@stannich@... I agree that 7" would be nice but don't think for a moment that it is any easier than the iPad. 5" (like the Dell) is pretty much the limit for males who use their shirt and pant pockets. For all the women I know who use the iPad, the purse was not an issue and the appreciated the size of the screen for browsing mags, newspapers and websites. Guess size does matter for some
Not sure how well the 7" is going to sell. Apple has already trained the public to buy 10". I will buy one, but I'm not sure everyone else will. When they come out with the 10", running on Android 3.0, then I think the sales will start to fly.
Its definatly better then the ipad based on speculation but i would have liked to see it have a 10" wide screen instead of the 7 if you wanted smaller 5 is the size then next is 10 " area but hope it doesnt come locked to AT&T or verizon
The Slate was said to be better than the iPad based on specs and teaser vid. The currier was said to be better than the iPad based on specs and renderings. Nether one of those materialized, vaporware.
We have no idea what version it will be running (though they did show V2.2), or if Google will finally give such a device their blessing (optimization, market place access, support).
If it's just running a blown-up Android 2.2 (800x480), then most likely it will be tied to a carrier. If they're going to advertise GPS as one of the features, there needs to be a carrier connection.
@Droid101 there are many more use cases for an ipad than watching videos. for a lot of other situations (internet, mail, ebooks, magazins) 4:3 is better suited.
Guess what Droid101, the vast majority of people using netbooks, iPads and other such devices are not currently watching a 16:9 movie. For almost everything else 4:3 makes more sense. I know 'cause I've tried the iPad for sufficient time to realize that. I too originally thought they made a mistake. The mistake was mine and it appears will soon be Samsung's as well.