ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

SATA Revision 3.0 paves way for 6Gb/s devices

By | May 28, 2009, 4:07am PDT

The Serial ATA International Organization (SATA-IO) has released the new Serial ATA Revision 3.0 specification. This new specification opens the way up for devices to transfer a whopping 6Gb/s … in theory at least.

According to SATA-IO president Knut Grimsrud “the SATA Revision 3.0 specification doubles the maximum transfer speed enabled by technology, paving the way for a new generation of faster SATA products.”

Note: We’re talking 6Gb/s here, not 6GB/s. 6Gb/s translates into 600MB/s transfer rate.

So, what’s new? Well, let’s begin with the obvious - SATA Revision 3.0 is backward compatible with earlier SATA implementations. With that out of the way, here’s what improved in the new spec:

  • A new Native Command Queuing (NCQ) streaming command to enable isochronous data transfers for bandwidth-hungry audio and video applications
  • An NCQ Management feature that helps optimize performance by enabling host processing and management of outstanding NCQ commands
  • Improved power management capabilities
  • A small Low Insertion Force (LIF) connector for more compact 1.8-inch storage devices
  • A connector designed to accommodate 7mm optical disk drives for thinner and lighter notebooks
  • Alignment with the INCITS ATA8-ACS standard

Note: Now how I’m calling the spec “SATA Revision 3.0.” This is because SATA-IO have issued naming guidelines. Here’s an excerpt:

What to Call the Specification: Please call this new specification by its proper name: “Serial ATA International Organization: Serial ATA Revision 3.0″. After using the full proper name for the first reference, it would be appropriate to refer to it thereafter more briefly as “SATA Revision 3.0″ or “SATA 6Gb/s.” It also would be appropriate to refer to the latest specification as being the “third generation of SATA technology.
What to Call the Products: For marketing and product naming purposes, the technology itself is to be referred to as “SATA 6Gb/s.” A product using this standard should be called the “SATA 6Gb/s [product name].” For an accurate description of SATA capabilities and the official guidelines to SATA product naming, please see the table below for more information.

A few points worth making:

  • Don’t expect to get anywhere near 6Gb/s transfer rate in the real world. Sure, devices will be branded as SATA 6Gb/s but just like SATA 3GB/s, the gulf between theory and practice is huge.
  • That said, the way that solid state drives (SSDs) are going we could see the 6Gb/s passed in a year or so. There are SSDs out there that can almost saturate the 3Gb/s bandwidth currently available. That said, I think that SSDs will eventually move to the PCIe.
  • The crappy connectors haven’t been changed. I’ve lost count of the number of broken clips and connectors I’ve come across.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Recent review
gnesterenko 29th May 2009
http://hothardware.com/Articles/Windows-7-Disk-Performance-Analyzed/?page=6

I liked actually it seems. These come close to saturation for read speeds (250+MB/s), so no SATA 2.0 not completely exhausted yet. But it IS reaching its limit quickly. And SSD tech is still rather infantile. Another generation and SATA 3.0 is actually right on time.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."
0 Votes
+ -
SATA Connectors *are* crap - agreed.
croberts 28th May 2009
Unbelievable that the old molex 4-pin power connector was better than the new one. I never had a molex pop out, but I've have several SATA power connectors disconnect, especially in fold-together desktops like Dells and small form factor PCs.

And the SATA data connector is just as bad, although I've seen a non-standard variant (I think inside a IBM/Lenovo) where the sata socket portion had little plastic "teeth" to grip the sata cable in place.

Definitely the SATA data/power ones are worse than SCSI, IDE, 4-pin floppy power connector, and the molex.
0 Votes
+ -
Connectors or cables?
lonniemcclure Updated - 28th May 2009
I've never had a SATA data cable come off, but perhaps that is because I use cables with a latch. No problems with the SATA power connectors either, despite none of the power supplies I have used having latches on the SATA power connectors.

I can say I've never had to use a pair of pliers to extract a SATA power connector, as has been the case with the older 4 pin Molex.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Crap Connectors
BernieLyons 28th May 2009
There are new cables now with metal clips that work like an "Alligator" clip that works very well and are the same price as the "CRAP" cables. I get them at Microcenter.
0 Votes
+ -
"That said, the way that solid state drives (SSDs) are going we could see the 6Gb/s passed in a year or so. There are SSDs out there that can almost saturate the 3Gb/s bandwidth currently available. That said, I think that SSDs will eventually move to the PCIe."

There are also built-in raid SSDs that surpass the 3Gb/s easily and sit on a single SATA cable - so those would benefit in addition to any fast SSD.

As for PCIe - I was under the impression that the big limitation of a PCIe SSD is that you cannot have a boot partition on the PCIe bus. I don't know how 'static' of a limitation that is - can it be altered with BIOS updates or would a new motherboard design be required - or if its impossible all together. Anyone care to shine some light on this?

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."
0 Votes
+ -
PCIe boot drive
croberts 28th May 2009
I supposed it would depend how it was designed. You can get a PCIe raid card, so as long as the drive included an appropriate interface to be visible to the BIOS, and the OS had an appropriate driver to communicate with it, it would be no different than a raid card with drives hanging from it. Just it would be all on one circuit board, and only be a single drive.
0 Votes
+ -
You bet
DrMicro 28th May 2009
"As for PCIe - I was under the impression that the big limitation of a PCIe SSD is that you cannot have a boot partition on the PCIe bus. I don't know how 'static' of a limitation that is - can it be altered with BIOS updates or would a new motherboard design be required - or if its impossible all together. Anyone care to shine some light on this?"

You're on the right track. Between a (relatively small) BIOS change and a motherboard instruction set, PCIe could be made just a bootable device as current PXE/SCSI, IDE, SATA HDD/FDD/USB/OPTICAL devices are now.

0 Votes
+ -
Comparing PCIe transfers:
isulzer 28th May 2009
SATA 3 basically has 4.8GT/s compared to PCIe's 8GT/s. The
difference isn't enough to warrant the switchover based on pure
numbers. SATA connectors are much smaller(that full multi channel
bandwidth for PCIe is with the 16x slot. which is 9cm long).

All we need for SATA would be to replace the 8b/10b encoding with
scrambling to get an extra 20%, and improve the connectors by
creating new cross compatible ones.

I'm not too sure how feasible using scrambling would be... but the
advantages of PCIe aren't enough. And per cm of connector size,
aren't even there. SATA could be improved though.
0 Votes
+ -
You are correct
DrMicro 28th May 2009
I think it's important to think of this in terms of an evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, change. Any increase in bandwidth and througput is welcome, and the more, the better.

Addressing the connector issue: there are after-market SATA connectors with latching available. If anyone is experiencing connector auto-disconnects, I'd suggest spending a few dollars to get some. Unfortunately, most OEMs don't provide them out of the box. Then there's the Western Digital proprietary all-in-one connector. WD obviously recognized the problem a long time ago and decided to offer a (relatively low-cost) alternative.
0 Votes
+ -
If the SATA data and power cables are inside a case, unsure why you'd complain that they come off easily - unless you're opening your case daily.

Could be worse - USB connectors.
0 Votes
+ -
Most SSDs are around 800 Mbps
georgeou 28th May 2009
Most SSDs are around 800 Mbps (READ) and maybe 3000
Mbps at best. Sequential write operations are much
slower than read.

I'm not sure where you've seen one that's 3000 Mbps.
SSDs are 100x faster on things like random IO but
they're not close to being that much faster on
sequential operations.
0 Votes
+ -
True, for now
DrMicro 28th May 2009
Though who's to say what another year or two will bring. Die changes, new materials, substrates and new controllers can all combine to (potentially) provide significan increases as the technology continues to mature.

BTW, nice to see you, George. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Recent review
gnesterenko 29th May 2009
http://hothardware.com/Articles/Windows-7-Disk-Performance-Analyzed/?page=6

I liked actually it seems. These come close to saturation for read speeds (250+MB/s), so no SATA 2.0 not completely exhausted yet. But it IS reaching its limit quickly. And SSD tech is still rather infantile. Another generation and SATA 3.0 is actually right on time.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix