What was the cause of the last PC failure you came across?
Summary: Quick poll inspired by a Hardware 2.0 (JaneB) reader who wanted to know what is the most common kind of PC failure.
Quick poll inspired by a Hardware 2.0 (JaneB) reader who wanted to know what is the most common kind of PC failure.
[poll id=335]
The most common failures I come across are"
- Dead PSUs (in new PCs)
- Dead motherboards (in PCs under a year old)
- Dead hard drives (in PCs older than about 4 years)
When it comes to my own PCs I try to minimize the chances of seeing a dead PSU by buying quality units, and reduce on the chances of being hit by a dead drive by moving them from critical service and into a non-critical role after about three years.
There's no way to protect against failures since entropy rules and if a component isn't dead, it's on the path to death. All you can do is minimize the disruption that the component failure causes.
Thoughts?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Nearly all hardware failures...
I disagree
I'm gonna say ...
Bad PSU's caused by voltage spikes.
Cause and Effect
Heat
I've lost 2 Power Supplies and a Graphic's Card to Heat. The crappy Air Conditioner doesn't help. So I'm forced to Clock Down and Undervolt my gear during the summer and part of fall.
My last HW failure was a PSU
In whose reality
Fire and Water
UPS Failure
P.S. Don't tell the support what you think is failing, just tell them the symptoms. Leave them open to all possibilities.
Actually, I think the most common cause is...
[spelling]
The good old HD
Mobo...
So no-one else has had a bad RAM chip recently?
My other failures have been a faulty mobo and a dead graphics card.
Dead DDR
(No) Thanks for the Memory
100 PCs = 2 bad PS last 2 years. Thats it. (NT)
1% failure rate - acceptable?
Woah, check that math...and data
You are also matching the failures to the wrong batch for rating purposes. The two computers that failed out of a 100 computer purchase (another assumption) are actually failures of the entire manufacturing line, and without more information regarding number of failures and number of units produced, you can't determine the actual rate of failure. They may be the only two out of the whole batch that failed and he's just the unlucky sap who got them (not likely...but you don't know...perhaps the QC guy was on a smoke break when they rolled down the line...).
Sometimes the cynical approach fails.
Very true...
For all we know the QC guy was drunk off his arse or hung over when they came past him. We just don't know and likely never will...