What's the take-away from Apple slashing iPhone production?

Summary: According to Friedman Billings Ramsey analyst Craig Berger, Apple has made deep cuts Q4 iPhone production plans by "as much as 40%", far more than originally estimated.

According to Friedman Billings Ramsey analyst Craig Berger, Apple has made deep cuts Q4 iPhone production plans by "as much as 40%", far more than originally estimated.

Berger believes that this is a sign of "global macroecomomic weakness:"

That the firm's iPhone production plans are being revised lower suggests that the global macroecomomic weakness is impacting even high-end consumers, those that are more likely to buy Apple's expensive gadgets, and that no market segment will be spared in this global downturn. This is a negative signal for global demand, in our view.

Hmmm ... I'm reluctant to make the call that the iPhone is in trouble? Why? Because there could be other factors at play here. For example:

  • Last quarter, Apple had 2 million iPhones in channel inventory - that's a lot of handsets.
  • Apple could be cutting inventory in the hope of picking up components cheaper after the Holiday quarter.
  • Past talk of iPod production cuts have always turned out either to be bogus, or not to have any overall correlation to quarterly sales.
  • This could all be down to Apple curring orders for a particular part, and rather than indicating a cut in production, it could mean that Apple is swapping suppliers.

... or this could be a sign that Apple isn't immune to the negative effects of the choppy financial seas companies are having to sail and is battening down the hatches to weather a coming storm.

Topics: Apple, Hardware, iPhone, Mobility

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

24 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Approaching End Of Cycle?

    MacRumors also points out that it's been 116 days since the 3G was released, and it was 126 days between the first iPhone and the 3G. Is it possible that Apple is looking at the end of the life cycle for the 3G and possibly planning to replace it around the MacWorld Conference in January?

    Otherwise I would guess it's all of the above.
    russwinn
  • re: Cut in iPhone Production

    Might this be a sign that there is a new version coming?
    BubbaJ
    • Possibly...

      ...although the chances of AT&T letting people restart their contracts this time are zero given the subsidy they're paying to Apple.

      More likely it's just hit the same wall all popular smartphones have - an initial rush followed by a drop off in demand as newer models come out or are announced. The pace of the mobile phone industry is unbelievably brutal.
      Sleeper Service
  • RE: What's the take-away from Apple slashing iPhone production?

    It's all part of a broad recessionary chill that is gripping our economy. Forecasts indicate weak Christmas Holiday retail shopping.

    It's not just Apple. It's everything. Sorry to say.

    Get out and vote America. Time for 'Change'.
    no_zd_user_name
    • As if ....

      .... obama has a clue about the economy. The only change he will bring about is from recession to depression. All leading economists agree that you never raise taxes in a recession.
      ShadeTree
      • Yeah, intelligence is "bad"

        That's right, only people who can swill beer and shoot at animals have the balls and know how to run a country properly. Wait, we've had that for eight years and we are in a GLOBAL CRISIS. CHANGE is right!! Time to throw the thugs out and it ain't soon enough!!
        nothingness
  • RE: What's the take-away from Apple slashing iPhone production?

    Adrian,

    Since you obviously have some aspirations to being regarded
    as a professional on-line journalist, why not start with the
    obvious question, "does Friedman Billings Ramsey analyst
    Craig Berger in fact know anything about Apple's Q4 iPhone
    production plans?"
    Andrew Sheppard
    • Probably not...

      ...but it's an irrelevancy.

      What would be better is to see how that IMEI tracker the guys at Bullish Cross were working on is going as that should give a good indication of burn rate.
      Sleeper Service
      • Would you care to explain this?

        It seems to have no connection to the article or the
        comment you are responding to.
        Vulpinemac
        • Well...

          ...since the ad hominem attacks on the analyst are, frankly, a bit boring I thought it would be useful to look at some data so I called up the IMEI spreadsheet the Bullish Cross guys were using to suggest that 10 million iPhones had been sold.

          Now, bear in mind that these are manufacturing codes and we know that 7 million were sold to end September, not 9 million, if we remove the outliers we have:

          End Week 27: 1,037,400
          End Week 31: 3,334,650 (2,297,250)
          End Week 36: 7,269,150 (3,394,500)
          End Week 40: 9,190,680 (1,921,530)

          Which suggests a sharp ramp up, peak and then decrease in manufacturing to end September. If we have data for October we can then determine if demand is waning or not.

          Pretty simple, no?
          Sleeper Service
          • Pretty simple, yes... but inconclusive

            It could just as easily indicate a levelling off of
            production after the initial inventory surge of a new
            product. After all, Apple had to create the base
            inventory to market the new product and supposedly
            would calculate how many are needed to maintain
            reasonable inventory while not over-producing which
            would create warehousing costs.

            The idea that they are considering maintaining a near-
            2 million-unit-per-month production level pretty
            much implies that demand hasn't dropped. That also
            seems to imply that they could, should the demand be
            there, sell as many as 20 million iPhones in the next
            year using the numbers you provide. I think we can
            both agree that such a number is currently unlikely,
            but not impossible.

            Oh, and based on your own referenced numbers, that's
            pretty much implying 7 million G3 iPhones when the 10
            million in '08 mark includes all versions. This, then,
            implies that the real numbers might be significantly
            higher when you do count the 1st-gen version.
            Vulpinemac
          • Well...

            ...we know they sold 6.92 million 3Gs up to end September so it's not an implication, it's a fact.

            However, it's worth pointing out that the first generation iPhone had a similar demand curve.
            Sleeper Service
          • ... had a similar demand curve.

            Followed by the announcement of a new model.
            Vulpinemac
          • Sure...

            ...however given AT&T's concessions on subsidies it's unlikely they'll allow early release from the current 18 month contracts.
            Sleeper Service
          • It's not like that slowed down...

            ... the release of the 3G version. If anything, demand rose
            for that and that was a mere 7 months after the 1st-gen
            iPhone. I almost expect to hear news of a new model or
            upgrade during MacWorldSF in Jan.
            Vulpinemac
    • I have to agree...

      When I read the original report by this analyst, he cited
      no sources for his claims. Essentially, it seemed he was
      "crying wolf" much like the teenager a few weeks ago
      with the false 'heart attack' report. This time, however,
      it's a person cognizant of the stock market and how it
      would react to such a report. Proof of this reaction is
      evident by the sudden slide yesterday after this report
      was announced.
      Vulpinemac
  • RE: What's the take-away from Apple slashing iPhone production?

    obama is gonna make them give one to everyone
    Monosdeja
    • Wrong

      Only those making under $120,000 a year, which, as everyone
      knows is 98% of Americans.

      Those making over $250,000 a year will have to buy 115% of
      all existing iPhones so that they can then keep 2%, and give
      113% to the government where bureaucrats will promptly lose
      25% to waste and corruption and give you the remaining 98%
      (except for aunt Zytuni, who doesn't need one in the slum),
      and everyone will then be happily middle class.

      P.S. DON'T question the numbers, Obama knows what he's
      doing; you don't, you selfish capitalist.
      frgough
      • LOL <nt>

        .
        Badgered
      • oh hooded one...

        your KLAN lies are old and tired...
        nothingness