Stage 2 meaningful use has some advantages for patients

Stage 2 meaningful use has some advantages for patients

Summary: There's been a lot of buzz about the new meaningful use standards announcements this past week.

TOPICS: Health, Mobility, Telcos

There's been a lot of buzz about the new meaningful use standards announcements this past week. My quick take on it is that if Stage 2 criteria were a phone, it'd be less like the iPhone 5 people were expecting, and more like the upgraded iPhone 4S they wound up with. In other words, tweaked, not revolutionary.

In my opinion, the user-experience-enhancing "Siri" of the piece (if I'm to carry the phone analogy too far -- work with me here!) is the upcoming requirement that more than half of a given organization's patients be provided timely online access to their health information, and that ten percent must actually access that information.

I mean, we've been able to use the Internet to access our bank records for some time now. Why shouldn't we be able to have the same kind of access to our medical records? I really think there should also be some sort of an appeals process when things are mis-charted, or misdiagnosis has occurred, but I won't be holding my breath until that shows up in the meaningful use guidelines.

If you want to know more about the new meaningful use guidelines, here are some resources to get you started.

Visit the HIMSS Meaningful Use OneSource for a great way to stay in the know. The site gives an overview of the topic, which includes the guidelines themselves (for both hospitals and professionals), links to webcasts of sessions on the topic, state-by-state information, breaking news, and notifications of future events.

If you'd like, you can download the actual PDF from the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Here's Medscape's take on the subject, which you may have to log in to read.

What would you like to see in the meaningful use guidelines? Let us know in the TalkBacks below.

Topics: Health, Mobility, Telcos


Denise Amrich is a Registered Nurse, the health care advisor for the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, and a mentor for the Virtual Campus at Florida's Brevard Community College.

Nothing in this article is meant to be a substitute for medical advice, and shouldn't be considered as such. If you are in need of medical help, please see your doctor.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Overview of proposed Stage 2 MU requirements

    If your readers are interested we will be interviewing one of the CMS authors of the NPRM for Stage 2 on our MU Live! internet radio show this Tuesday at 2 pm eastern,
  • Advance Directives

    In all the talks on "patient-centered healthcare" and "patient empowerment," it seems that everyone has completely overlooked the fact that there is no higher level of patient-centered care than actually asking a patient what treatment he/she wants, and then honoring those wishes to the extent possible. Ignoring the wishes of patients cannot continue if we are going to save our healthcare system. Therefore, I think that it is critical that the meaningful use guidelines follow the strong recommendation of the HIT Policy Committee that advance directives be made a core requirement of Meaningful Use Stage 2 for all EPs, EHs and CAHs, and the requirement should be that >50% of patients >49 yrs old seen for an annual physical during the reporting period have the result of an advance directive discussion recorded in the EHR, and the advance directive itself if one exists. In addition, the criteria should be that CMS-certified EHRs should be required to enable online documentation and patient/health proxy signature of advance directives. The EHR should be required to directly access the advance directive, not simply "indicate where it might be located." This HIT Policy Committee recommendation is being COMPLETELY IGNORED in the proposed Stage 2 Meaningful Use rule.
  • Patient Engagement can't be overemphasized

    I think more emphasis should be put on patient engagement. It's really the only hope to improve outcomes (and slay the healthcare cost beast) for 3/4 of U.S. healthcare spend -- chronic conditions.

    It's a failure of imagination of the vendor community if we can't come up with dozens of ways for providers to surpass the 10% engagement threshold. Any # of companies could help them. It will be a catalyst to finally bring in the most important member of the care team into the care process -- the patient. It can be done.

    See "Patients are More Than a Vessel for Billing Codes" for more.