Behind the GOP revolt on health care
Summary: Increasing numbers of Republicans are telling the party it should make a deal along the lines of the Finance Committee bill due for a vote tomorrow.
It's not your imagination. There is a growing revolt within the Republican Party on health care.
Increasing numbers of Republicans are quietly telling the party it should make a deal along the lines of the Finance Committee bill due for a vote tomorrow.
So far this does not extend to Congress, where the party remains united against any deal it doesn't write (and maybe not even that). It does not extend into the party's base, into the grassroots activists who are adamant, for ideological reasons, that any deal is a surrender to socialism.
Where it's coming from is business. Especially big business, and the medical-industrial complex. Even the insurance companies.
Former "loyal Bushies" now making their living off K Street want a deal because their sugar daddies may cross over without one.
- We're talking about companies in the Fortunate 500 that need visibility on health care costs before they can begin hiring again.
- We're talking about hospitals and their suppliers, who figure they can make up on volume what they might lose to the current reform proposals.
- And we're talking about insurers who know the present deal will give them millions of new customers without destroying their pricing "flexibility."
The modern Republican party has long been based on three pillars -- Wall Street Republicans who care about money, Pentagon Street Republicans who care about defense, and Church Street Conservatives whose activism made the party a majority.
On Election Day it's the last group that counts. The rest of the time it's the first.
The mini-revolt does not encompass the entire Wall Street wing. There remain plenty of business executives who continue to take their orders from Rupert Murdoch, via either Fox News or The Wall Street Journal.
But it does encompass most players in the medical marketplace, on both the buy side and the sell side. The present deal, so detested by liberals, is one most feel they can live with, even profit from.
But the conservative Democrats who brought them the deal can't face down their own liberal base unless some Republican Congresscritters are willing to walk the plank with them. Including some not named Olympia Snowe.
It's up to lobbyists like McClellan (above, from Wikipedia) to bring some Republicans to the table while Harry Reid works on his "leadership bill" or watch liberals force through something more partisan and less friendly to industry.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
that's FUD
As always, the GOP members stay united and and now have the support of most American people.
Defections are rare because the republican ideology is the right medicine for America.
wtf...?
tisk tisk
ZDNET is not a LIBERAL soap box...
You want to talk the merits of tech in medicine - I'm there.
If you just use your position as a writer to spout your liberal views, you're doing the site a disservice.
Yes it is.. where have you been?
This is straight-up reporting
The biggest traffic hits I get are when I write about disease, and when I write about policy.
Doesn't have to be health care policy, like now. I got fair traffic when the subject was tech policy earlier this year.
You want me to ignore the market and leave money on the table? That's communism!
Bull*** it's straight up reporting
Here's how a journalist would headline the story:
Some Republicans Considering Siding with Democrats on Government-
run Health Care.
That would be factually accurate.
Uh, no, it wouldn't
They're not. None of the bills being offered, by either House, creates a single-payer system, such as the VA. Some, not all, let people buy into something akin to Medicare at their option. The rest merely regulate the market, which businesses say is running away with their profits and which consumers say isn't serving their needs.
I don't think your headline is fair and balanced at all. GOP Revolt on Health Care doesn't describe what the revolt is, or what the position is they're revolting toward or from. It merely states there's a division from the majority view, within the party, on the issue of health care.
Which I substantiate there is. From people aligned closely with business interests -- both the industries involved and large enterprises that pay much of the freight.
A Republican
dream on.
I agree
It's also the weakness. Because you can't build a majority on an ideology. We're all Mensheviks now.
Sure it is. But it's still out of place on ZDNet.
ZDNet says of itself:
"ZDNet: Tech News, Blogs and White Papers for IT Professionals. Where Technology Means Business: ZDNet delivers the best tech news, and resources for IT hardware, software, networking and services."
You're saying it should be on SmartPlanet
Does anyone here other than me read SmartPlanet?
Not yet but we have high hopes
But we have high hopes and I'd love to see y'all there.
True
It's extra. It's free. Come to think of it, it's all free, isn't it? All you give is your time. Which you're free to give or withhold, as you see fit.
What is happening to ZDnet?
In the past, I've enjoyed reading about technology on this site. Now it's slowly becoming a Messiah parrot.
Government health care for all!
No more CO2 emissions!
Tax the crap out of those mean Republicans!
Seig Heil!
Refreshing to see that I'm not the only one seeing this.
"ZDNet: Tech News, Blogs and White Papers for IT Professionals. Where Technology Means Business: ZDNet delivers the best tech news, and resources for IT hardware, software, networking and services."
I don't see how liberal soapboxing ties in to
- software
- networking
- computer hardware
- IT professionals
Same goes for Fuller's blogs. Increasingly Dana's and Harry's blogs have become channels for just a political view.
Game over, Dude!
Seth Godwin is a prophet.
A good grassroots Republican
That's unhealthy. It's not the way a democratic system is supposed to work. It's the way that German phrase you quoted tells it to work.
It's still out of place on ZDNet. Reminder: ZDNet says of itself:
ZDnet
The real problem I do not see any corroborating evidence in Republican circles. In addition, is it out of place for ZdNet. Worst where is the Zdnet editor?
Try using the links