Brokers try to pre-empt insurance exchanges

By | September 2, 2010, 11:02am PDT

Summary: These are choices in the market. Coverage for your health, or catastrophic coverage. They are not the same thing.

Insurance brokers are working hard to pre-empt the coming move to state insurance exchanges, and push consumers to catastrophic plans before they’re offered more comprehensive coverage.

Healthcompare is one of the leaders in this move. Input your data and, after all the bells and whistles, you get a page of very high deductible plans — $10-20,000 deductibles. In addition to the .com site, they have a .org offering the same services, but different content.

That’s not health care, unless you have a heart attack or car accident. It’s insurance against catastrophe, which is what insurance is supposed to be, but not what people think they’re getting when they seek health insurance.

The plan under health reform is to offer an open market for serious health plans with a government-defined set of services, including wellness services, health screenings, and prevention.

Medicare offers all that, which may be why even conservatives who hate “Obamacare” want “government hands off my Medicare,” not knowing it is in fact a government plan.

These are choices in the market. Coverage for your health, or catastrophic coverage. They are not the same thing.

Healthcompare is not alone in this market. There are other sites, like eHealthInsurance and HealthPlanOne, offering similar online services.

Healthcompare is a Word & Brown company, launched on March 24. If the date sounds familiar, it’s the day after the President signed the health reform law.

The same firm also offers Quotit, a company that builds custom sites for agents and brokers. Among their other holdings are Choice Administrators, which it calls “the nation’s only private insurance exchange,” and CONEXIS, which administers COBRA plans for ex-employees who still want their former employer’s insurance.

The last months have seen a drumbeat of carriers announcing they would put plans on HealthCompare. Humana, CIGNA, Blue Shield of California, and Kaiser are just some of the companies now offering policies there.

In addition to buying ads, Healthcompare has a bunch of folks who visit forums where health insurance is discussed. Here is one in the Baltimore Sun, another at CBS News, another in the LA Times, and one on Creditloan.com. They also do a lot of pay per call advertising. They’re on Facebook. They tweet.

One reason for the online love might be HealthCompare’s program of compensating brokers for referrals. The plan was announced in an e-mail blast and drew some pushback from brokers worried about competing for individual and family plans (IFP).

The broker who spilled these beans categorized it as part of a plan to move ex-employees from COBRA plans to individual plans, hence off company books.

If that’s the plan, it’s working. And if that’s the plan, it’s not a secret either. Here’s an article on Healthcompare’s site touting such “high-deductible” plans, with a picture of happy young people jogging.

So we have two types of health reform, one public and one private. The public one you know about and, love it or hate it, it’s the law. The other is offered by companies like HealthCompare.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years. At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog. DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air. My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994.

Talkback Most Recent of 3 Talkback(s)

  • ZDNet Gravatar
    espringer11
    2nd Sep 2010
  • More like built from links
    @espringer11 I really didn't know how it woudl conclude until I followed all the links I found while researching the story.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DanaBlankenhorn
    3rd Sep 2010
  • RE: Brokers try to pre-empt insurance exchanges
    Well I appreciate you opinion but you leave a one-sided discussion and definitely not very informed on individual coverage options. First off, I am an health insurance broker so yes I could be jaded but I won't be in my re-educating you about individual health insurance. First of all, all the companies that QuoteIt sites offer have low deductible options. You don't have to get the high-deductible plan although I can give you several reasons why you should and couple it with supplemental coverage but that's another issue.
    In addition, all the plans offered and companies offered all have to be compliant with the new coverage requirements of the new PPACA law which means they have to offer preventative care and the same things that you seem to act like they do not. Last but not least, these plans and companies will be very similar to what will ultimately be in the exchanges at both the state and federal levels. In the exchange you will possibly get subsidies depending on income, outside the exchange you will not or at least that's the way the law is written at this point.

    This conservative, knows that government run healthcare which we ultimately will all have to go to eventually anyway, due to runaway costs or at least to some hybrid form of government/private run healthcare; the countries that have such government run coverage does have much more waiting, especially for critical care and high-end testing, and nothing like the quality we have today. I know, Medicare is government run, however, we cannot sustain the cost of Medicare and care will have to be rationed and already is happening. Meanwhile more and more doctors are not accepting Medicaid and Medicare due to low reimbursement.
    I do favor a system that pools all citizens into one group to negotiate costs as CMS does for Medicare. I however, do not like the idea of a one-payer system because once we go down that aisle, there is no turning back. Unfortunately with the passing of PPACA we are already headed down the road as the industry is suffering incredible amounts of regulatory red tape and administrative costs that it cannot stay afloat because of medical loss ratio requirements. Unfortunately, that's what the authors of this bill had in mind when they wrote it and shoved it down the majority's throat that didn't want it.

    Next time, give political spin and check your facts.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    korydc1
    13th Oct 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources