Corporate health reform comes to our house
Summary: The idea is here is a pile of money for health care. It's yours to spend. Use it, but if you don't then you don't lose it. It rolls over. It lets people save for things like cosmetic procedures. It creates an incentive for them to shop and get the best deal.
While most attention remains focused on Washington and the health reform debate, it's also the season where corporations sign their workers to next year's health plans.
This is where the real reform is happening. (The blog Bombing Science found this on a wall in Toronto. We'll discuss its importance.)
My wife's employer has offered us insurance for many years now, but she pushed this year's brochure on me last night because, instead of offering the usual option of a PPO (Preferred Provider Organization) or HMO (Health Maintenance Organization), it's now focused on three different choices:
- A plan offering low deductibles.
- A plan offering low premiums.
- A Health Savings Account (HSA).
Having read a lot of brochures in the past, it seems clear that my wife's employer wants me to take Option Three.
Health Savings Accounts have been around for years, mainly as part of a high deductible plan. This year our employer, in conjunction with its insurer, is pushing it as something else. Health reform.
Under the plan preventive care is covered 100%. No deductibles, no copays, nothing. Checkups are free, get yours today. Care outside the provider's network only gets 60% coverage, but inside the network it's the same 80% as always.
These lower rates on out-of-network care are drawing serious political heat. The HSA is a bridge between this reality and a new set of market incentives.
The idea is here is a pile of money for health care. It's yours to spend. Use it, but if you don't then you don't lose it. It rolls over. It lets people save for things like cosmetic procedures. It creates an incentive for them to shop and get the best deal on costs covered by the HSA.
This will be great for people who don't get terribly sick. For those who do, just stay in-network and you get the same deal you got before.
But giving employees free preventive care and an incentive to restrict their other use of the resource is the heart of the plan. It's not just what Republicans have been calling for. It's what corporate and insurance reformers have been looking toward, a way to turn consumer choice into a weapon against costs.
When people talk about having 80% agreement on what needs to be done to control health care costs, this is the kind of thing they're talking about.
I don't know if it will work. I don't even know whether we'll sign up for it. But it is a reform, in that it's a completely different plan than anything our family has been offered before. It's market-driven, but it also meets the Administration's goals of having people covered at work.
Change has come.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
It doesn't matter
This is the reform you get without reform
This is the cost control system the market is pushing, based on giving people an incentive to cut back on costs and shop.
Why you not happy?
RE: Corporate health reform comes to our house
It is true you can use some of what is left in the first quarter of the next year but it is only for expenses from the previous year.
Anything not spent on previous years expenses are lost.
Been there, done that and lost money and that is why I no longer do it.
Some accounts do roll over
Thanks for writing about this. Good question.
We're overlooking the uninsured!
That's not a question business can answer
But for IT people who are employed, this is what health insurance reform is going to look like, and it's here now.
HSA has been around for awhile ...
These things are being reinvented
Big difference, IMO.
So,,,,,
Hmm.
This is IT news... why?
It's employers cutting benefits
employers are looking to cut their costs. This is giong to
be a tough year for some employees used to excellent
coverage, and without reform next year will be worse.
My main concern would be "network" medicine. There is
no logical reason why, say, a second opinion should cost
more out of network than it does within network.
Or if your wife is going through a high risk pregnancy and
there are no high risk OB specialists in Network why should
you pay more out of network?
I think that once we get rid of anti-trust immunity for
health insurance companies we'll be seeing a lot of nasty
secrets coming to light and networks might well be one of
the nasties.