Corporate health reform comes to our house

Summary: The idea is here is a pile of money for health care. It's yours to spend. Use it, but if you don't then you don't lose it. It rolls over. It lets people save for things like cosmetic procedures. It creates an incentive for them to shop and get the best deal.

While most attention remains focused on Washington and the health reform debate, it's also the season where corporations sign their workers to next year's health plans.

This is where the real reform is happening. (The blog Bombing Science found this on a wall in Toronto. We'll discuss its importance.)

My wife's employer has offered us insurance for many years now, but she pushed this year's brochure on me last night because, instead of offering the usual option of a PPO (Preferred Provider Organization) or HMO (Health Maintenance Organization), it's now focused on three different choices:

  1. A plan offering low deductibles.
  2. A plan offering low premiums.
  3. A Health Savings Account (HSA).

Having read a lot of brochures in the past, it seems clear that my wife's employer wants me to take Option Three.

Health Savings Accounts have been around for years, mainly as part of a high deductible plan. This year our employer, in conjunction with its insurer, is pushing it as something else. Health reform.

Under the plan preventive care is covered 100%. No deductibles, no copays, nothing. Checkups are free, get yours today. Care outside the provider's network only gets 60% coverage, but inside the network it's the same 80% as always.

These lower rates on out-of-network care are drawing serious political heat. The HSA is a bridge between this reality and a new set of market incentives.

The idea is here is a pile of money for health care. It's yours to spend. Use it, but if you don't then you don't lose it. It rolls over. It lets people save for things like cosmetic procedures. It creates an incentive for them to shop and get the best deal on costs covered by the HSA.

This will be great for people who don't get terribly sick. For those who do, just stay in-network and you get the same deal you got before.

But giving employees free preventive care and an incentive to restrict their other use of the resource is the heart of the plan. It's not just what Republicans have been calling for. It's what corporate and insurance reformers have been looking toward, a way to turn consumer choice into a weapon against costs.

When people talk about having 80% agreement on what needs to be done to control health care costs, this is the kind of thing they're talking about.

I don't know if it will work. I don't even know whether we'll sign up for it. But it is a reform, in that it's a completely different plan than anything our family has been offered before. It's market-driven, but it also meets the Administration's goals of having people covered at work.

Change has come.

Topics: Health, CXO, IT Employment

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

10 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • It doesn't matter

    All the health care reform bills currently in congress eliminate HSAs.
    frgough
    • This is the reform you get without reform

      If you do nothing, if nothing passes (and you want nothing passed) this is the reform you will get.

      This is the cost control system the market is pushing, based on giving people an incentive to cut back on costs and shop.

      Why you not happy?
      DanaBlankenhorn
  • RE: Corporate health reform comes to our house

    You were wrong about one thing. Health Savings Account do not roll over.

    It is true you can use some of what is left in the first quarter of the next year but it is only for expenses from the previous year.

    Anything not spent on previous years expenses are lost.

    Been there, done that and lost money and that is why I no longer do it.
    WhoTheyGonnaFoolNext
    • Some accounts do roll over

      If you'll recall our piece on medical tourism, http://healthcare.zdnet.com/?p=2720 there is an account called an HRA that does roll over. What it's called in the literature may not be what it is in fact, since people understand HSA but not HRA.

      Thanks for writing about this. Good question.
      DanaBlankenhorn
  • We're overlooking the uninsured!

    This plan obviously covers people who are insured through employment. What about workers who become unemployed or people who are unemployed?
    PeopleFirst
    • That's not a question business can answer

      Covering the uninsured and unemployed is not a business question. It's a political question. Has to be. No way around it.

      But for IT people who are employed, this is what health insurance reform is going to look like, and it's here now.
      DanaBlankenhorn
      • HSA has been around for awhile ...

        so it really shouldn't be called healthcare reform, except to those who are being given the option for the first time. It's great if one is fairly healthy. Furthermore, rollover of dollars are only good for the first quarter of the next plan year and only counts toward illness carried over from the previous plan year.
        PeopleFirst
        • These things are being reinvented

          Where before HSAs (or HRAs) were an adjunct to the plan, meant to deliver tax benefits, now they're a big feature of the plan, meant to encourage frugality.

          Big difference, IMO.
          DanaBlankenhorn
  • So,,,,,

    you get an option for another way to cover your personal health costs.
    Hmm.

    This is IT news... why?

    CounterEthicsCommissioner-23034636492738337469105860790963
  • It's employers cutting benefits

    Health care costs continue to go through the roof and
    employers are looking to cut their costs. This is giong to
    be a tough year for some employees used to excellent
    coverage, and without reform next year will be worse.

    My main concern would be "network" medicine. There is
    no logical reason why, say, a second opinion should cost
    more out of network than it does within network.

    Or if your wife is going through a high risk pregnancy and
    there are no high risk OB specialists in Network why should
    you pay more out of network?

    I think that once we get rid of anti-trust immunity for
    health insurance companies we'll be seeing a lot of nasty
    secrets coming to light and networks might well be one of
    the nasties.
    Ken_z