David Blumenthal unveils an FCC of health IT

By | December 4, 2009, 12:18pm PST

Summary: What Blumenthal seems to be doing is making communities compete for money so that examples of best practices in the meaningful use of health IT can be established that act as models for other cities.

Dr. David Blumenthal, the National Coordinator for Health IT, has reorganized his office along the lines of agencies like the FCC, as he prepares to spend the $19.2 billion in HITECH money authorized by the Obama stimulus.

The new structure, delivered December 1, will create five offices under his, including one for a chief scientist, a deputy for programs and policy, a deputy for operations, an office of economic modeling and analysis, and a chief privacy officer.

The chief scientist will track grants, the policy group will define “meaningful use” under which grants are awarded, the operations office will manage contracts, while the economic modeling office will evaluate the results of everyone’s spending.

All four of these groups replace existing offices. The privacy office is new. This official will report directly to Blumenthal on issues of data privacy and security, and will be appointed by Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sibelius.

Blumenthal also set aside $235 million in grants for 15 “beacon communities,” which will be held up as models of what everyone else should do. Applications for the grants are due February 1, with each grant worth up to $20 million.

What Blumenthal seems to be doing is making communities compete for money so that examples of best practices in the meaningful use of health IT can be established that act as models for other cities.

This is in contrast to simply distributing money around the country in proportion to economic need, political pull, or some measure of fairness. It’s a Darwinian approach meant to create centers of excellence.

Excellence will be be defined by coordinating operations and making change happen. Blumenthal said the grant winners will already be leaders in using data to change workflows, improve patient care and monitor quality.

The money is intended to take these communities further, in order to prove that IT can actually improve outcomes and lower costs, which a recent report from Blumenthal’s old Harvard stomping grounds says it has not yet done.

Once results are proven in a few communities, these places will then be held up as models driving change in others.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years. At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog. DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air. My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994.
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

The purpose of the re-org
DanaBlankenhorn 5th Dec 2009
The purpose of the re-org is to track this
spending and try to make certain it does what
it's designed to do.

I think the key to it is that Dr. Blumenthal is
creating a competition among cities designed to
create examples the others will follow.

In that it's similar to what is happening in the
education department.

Competition can be a good thing. Isn't that what
Republicans keep saying? Yes, I believe it is.
0 Votes
+ -
Translation
frgough 4th Dec 2009
$19 billion will be taken out of the engine of economic production and
laundered through Blumenthal to buy votes.
0 Votes
+ -
Cynicism
DanaBlankenhorn 5th Dec 2009
I know Republicans did that for years, but it's
not an axiom that anything government does is
always wrong, or bad, or badly run.

I know you believe that to be true, but it's not
true. Only those with contempt for government
are going to run a contemptible government.

People who care can actually get things done.
But we'll see what happens.
0 Votes
+ -
Hope something will come out of it.
Abortion=Murder 4th Dec 2009
Dana, maybe you can track this expenditure and come back to us in a few years time and report on what the outcome was. It's a lot of money that us taxpayers have to cough up (or rather - will have to cough up).
0 Votes
+ -
The purpose of the re-org
DanaBlankenhorn 5th Dec 2009
The purpose of the re-org is to track this
spending and try to make certain it does what
it's designed to do.

I think the key to it is that Dr. Blumenthal is
creating a competition among cities designed to
create examples the others will follow.

In that it's similar to what is happening in the
education department.

Competition can be a good thing. Isn't that what
Republicans keep saying? Yes, I believe it is.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix