HealthIT getting more money from 2011 budget

HealthIT getting more money from 2011 budget

Summary: Will the health IT money make it through? Only if money already budgeted is spent transparently. It would also help if experiments in using health IT to drive improvements in care, recently begun in Indiana and North Carolina, show some positive results.

SHARE:
1

The 2011 budget proposed by the Obama Administration yesterday includes another $110 million specifically for health IT.

UPDATE: Between the Lines has a complete analysis of the 2011 budget proposal.

The money would go to "strengthen health IT policy, coordination, and research activities," which means it would likely be controlled by National Coordinator for Health IT David Blumenthal (right).

There is also $286 million in the budget to expand comparative effectiveness research, learning what works and what doesn't, what's cost effective and what isn't. Much of that money would likely go out through the National Institutes of Health.

A Republican attack on the money has already begun.

Libertarian Bob Barr fears a government database. Republican Newt Gingrich wants the government to concentrate on Medicare fraud.  How you do that without data isn't discussed, but when you're in opposition you don't have to answer questions, just question answers. (Democrats did the same thing.)

More to Gingrich's point there is $250 million in the budget for just what he wants, detecting more Medicare abuse through a program called the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT). Their Web address is StopMedicalFraud.gov.

The introduction of a budget is only the first step in a process, but financial bills can be passed by a majority in the Senate. No budget, however, gets past Congressional logrolling, no matter who proposes it, or past demagoguery, from both sides of the aisle.

Will the health IT money make it through? Only if money already budgeted is spent transparently. It would also help if experiments in using health IT to drive improvements in care, recently begun in Indiana and North Carolina, show some positive results.

Topics: IT Employment, CXO, Health, Legal

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

1 comment
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Gingrich?s point

    To save money and fight fraud, I can't figure out why we keep giving contracts to companies that put share holders first and are wholly owned subsidiaries of health insurance companies who have big legal issues over their corrupted data bases that were used for 8-9 years on out of network charges with many more legals suits either in court or on the way.

    Wonder if Mr.Gingrich has a clue on this one, or maybe Rockefeller can clue him in:) It seems to be a ton of money even above and beyond the new announced funds could be recovered with non profits doing the policing for fraud with perhaps some "certified" algorithms that we get too see on how they work, you know kind of like what Medicare does, we can see their formulations, otherwise we are just at the mercy of business intelligence designed only for profit from those with shareholder dividends to pay.

    http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com/2010/01/little-progress-on-fighting-healthcare.html
    MedicalQuack