ie8 fix

Quitting brings new risks

By | January 5, 2010, 6:15am PST

Summary: That increased risk gradually dropped. After 12 years without cigarettes, the risk of diabetes onset was no different than for people who had always been smoke free.

Ever been to an AA meeting?

(My daughter calls Anthony Bourdain, right, the smoking chef. He quit smoking a few years ago. This one’s for you, Tony.)

The conventional picture is always the same. People are smoking like mad. It helps with the nerves from not drinking, but doctors know you’re just swapping addictions, and cigarettes will do the same thing to your lungs that alcoholism did to your liver.

OK, so you quit smoking. We all have friends who have quit smoking. What happens first?

You gain weight. Food suddenly tastes good again, you need something to do with your mouth and hands. Loyal friends keep quiet because, heck, it beats smoking.

Yes, it does. But according to the Annals of Internal Medicine, it nearly doubles your risk for diabetes over the next few years.

Johns Hopkins scientists looked at the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. It involved about 11,000 people who did not have diabetes starting in 1987 to 1989. Interviews both at at the start and during the study identified the smokers, and blood tests identified those who developed Type 2 diabetes.

Over the 9 years of the study, that represented 1,254 people, about 10% of the sample. The Hopkins researchers found smoking itself increased the risk of Type 2 diabetes by 42%.

The study’s authors then followed up with the records of 380 patients who quit smoking. After fully adjusting for age, weight and other factors, it was found these people were 91% more likely to get diabetes within three years of quitting.

But here’s the key takeaway. That increased risk gradually dropped. After 12 years without cigarettes, the risk of diabetes onset was no different than for people who had always been smoke free.

Here’s the conclusion:

Cigarette smoking predicts incident type 2 diabetes, but smoking cessation leads to higher short-term risk. For smokers at risk for diabetes, smoking cessation should be coupled with strategies for diabetes prevention and early detection.

Everyone agrees that drinking, smoking and overeating are lifestyle choices, and they are. But they are also choices that can lead to sickness and a horrible death. Cirrhosis, lung cancer and diabetes are all very nasty.

The question is, how do we develop a lifestyle approach for quitting all excess that doesn’t make the doctor look like a hectoring tyrant, and doesn’t turn patients like Bourdain into boring health nuts?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years. At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog. DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air. My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
14
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

I haven't had that happen, but...
DanaBlankenhorn 8th Jan 2010
Smokers feel as oppressed as other drug users these days, and some are bound to lash out. I'm sorry this happened to you, but I don't think it's a general thing.
0 Votes
+ -
Hectoring Tyrants
aureolin 5th Jan 2010
Why do I see you recommending making the
Government the 'hectoring tyrant'? Maybe it's
your gloating "The nanny state works!!" a month
or so ago?

The problem is that this country was founded on
self-actualization and freedom of choice
(religious and otherwise). IF you're only able
to chose what one side or the other deems is
'good' for you, then you live in a
dictatorship, not a democracy.

It's not freedom if you can't choose something
that someone else despises.
0 Votes
+ -
Actually, the problem is....
rmazzeo 5th Jan 2010
...that we were founded upon freedom of choice, but now we are a nation with freedom FROM choice, at least as far as abortion & religion go. Remember, we are not ALLOWED to pray in public schools...try it & see what happens - hence, freedom FROM religion. Also remember, we kill our own children in the womb & call it "choice", but what "choice" does that innocent child have (note: not fetus - it will grow up to be HUMAN if we allow it to live...)? In truth, we do live in a dictatorship, not a democracy anymore...
0 Votes
+ -
Actually the problem is
samcraw@... 5th Jan 2010
On the back of the Great Seal of the United States (designed by George Washington and crew) it stated in Latin "a new secular order".

Clearly that is not been the direction this country has taken in most of it's history. As long as there are people like you who see the absence of a religious order as a dictation rather than an enactment of the original purpose and basis of the country as the Seal states, have created a guaranteed downward slide of of the US into the quagmire of theological rule-- the way Europe was ruled when the US came into being-- the reason why our forbearers fought and died to create a nation free of that kind of tyranny.

Your message shows that that sacrifice did not bring about the change that was desired, we are once again in the grip of religious madness-- the attempt to paint those who wish to choke the basic freedom upon which this country was created-- a new secular order-- and replace it with the insanity of the religious state.

You would have a country die but fight to have a fetus live.

You have created what you deserve. a failing irrational state.
0 Votes
+ -
perhaps unintentionally, confusing the issue.

In fact, you ARE allowed to pray in school; you're just not allowed to force anyone else to pray, or to pray in such a way as to infringe on anyone else's right to pray to a different god, or to not pray at all.

I suppose it's difficult to do exactly what the law asks, at least for some. All it asks is that you keep your religion to yourself, which is nothing more than simple human respect.

Perhaps you should try that and see what happens.
0 Votes
+ -
He's freer than that
DanaBlankenhorn 5th Jan 2010
Under the First Amendment people do have a right to seek the conversion of people to their religion. They just can't impose their religious faith on others.

That's a fair deal. Absolute freedom for simple tolerance. Kind of like open source in a way.
0 Votes
+ -
Well, you'll be free in Iran
DanaBlankenhorn 5th Jan 2010
If you want to impose your religion on others, Iran or Saudi Arabia would be happy to have you. Oh, it's a different religion, you say? Hey, check it out. You may be surprised.
0 Votes
+ -
Well Said
samcraw@... 5th Jan 2010
Exactly the point. We are living in a dictatorship of a drive to "sameness"-- defined by an imaginary set of values.

We are killing the secular state-- the state that all the people who led and fought the revolutionary war sacrificed life and limb to create.

The Religious right are bringing down the country that was predicated on the religious right being kept at bay.

But as always has happened, those people are the cancer that has killed attempts at democracy throughout history. The USA is simply their next victim.
0 Votes
+ -
You are free to smoke
DanaBlankenhorn 5th Jan 2010
I just don't want to inhale the smoke, and I want you to pay the full costs of your smoking. Same with other choices.
0 Votes
+ -
A short time ago, I was standing outside at a mall waiting for my wife when a woman came up fairly close to me and lit up her filthy weed.
I moved away from her and she followed.
I moved again and then she started to scream! about "smokers rights".
All this time I had not said a word although I might have frowned a little.
Just what the hell is wrong with these nut cases?
I have!!!!! a right to avoid their filth.
0 Votes
+ -
I haven't had that happen, but...
DanaBlankenhorn 8th Jan 2010
Smokers feel as oppressed as other drug users these days, and some are bound to lash out. I'm sorry this happened to you, but I don't think it's a general thing.
0 Votes
+ -
Ballast
kidtree Updated - 5th Jan 2010
Are the previous TalkBacks related to the original post?

Mark Twain said whenever he got sick his doctor would warn him about his health vs. his bad habits, so he'd quit smoking or drinking or something until he got better. But he had a neighbor who didn't smoke, drink, gamble or swear. When she got sick she had no ballast to throw overboard, as Twain put it, so she simply died.

I guess I should start smoking so I can quit later. But wait... never mind. I'm going jogging tonight.
0 Votes
+ -
Mark Twain
DanaBlankenhorn 5th Jan 2010
What would the 19th century have been in America without Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain? Slave-owning and humorless, for starters.
hello.. weight is related to diabetes onset.

Is this to scare people back into smoking or just to let them know that they are dammed from the start no matter what they do?

Bottom line.. you could avoid all these risk.. and still die in a car wreck at the age of 30.
0 Votes
+ -
Very True, b_d_b
DanaBlankenhorn 5th Jan 2010
Just read to the end. The risk goes down toward zero over time, and after 12 years you're no worse off than someone who never smoked, insofar as diabetes risk is concerned.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix