The Hogzilla Hospital Stimulus Act

By | August 4, 2010, 8:12am PDT

Summary: The purpose of the stimulus was not to provide a kickback for investments made back in the day. Its purpose is to drive the benefits of health IT down to poor hospitals and clinics that could not otherwise afford the gear.

The first bill to change the meaningful use rules has already been filed.

H.R. 6072, dubbed “The Electronic Health Record Incentives for Multi-Campus Hospitals Act of 2010,” would change the rules to allow hospitals with multiple campuses to get multiple stimulus checks. The American Hospital Association likes it.

The argument is that, even if hospitals like Emory (its Crawford Long Hospital was renamed Emory Midtown a few years ago) are buying a single compatible system for all units, there are “incremental acquisition, training and implementation costs” that should still be compensated.

It’s a money grab. My own working title is the “Hogzilla Hospital Stimulus Act.” Like a lot of other proposals, it’s designed specifically to send money to people who don’t need it, and deny money to people who do.

(Picture of Hogzilla from Wikipedia. Yeah, I know about the kid in Alabama who supposedly bagged a bigger one. But that’s an AP photo. Besides, the kid probably heard the pig was going to sign with Auburn. (Rimshot.) But I digress.)

It’s a money grab that might work, given the AHA’s clout. Most of the House Ways & Means Committee has already signed-on, two Republicans as well as nearly all the Democrats. It’s on a fast track.

But there is a reason why the rule was written as it was. The money’s not unlimited, and the big hospitals have already made most of their investments. Many have even gotten a return on that investment.

The purpose of the stimulus was not to provide a kickback for investments made back in the day. Its purpose is to drive the benefits of health IT down to poor hospitals and clinics that could not otherwise afford the gear.

The big hospitals were already being compensated under the rule. Now they want another bite of the apple, and they’ve got a lot of friends behind them. If they succeed small clinics and individual practitioners, the people the HITECH stimulus was designed to help, could be shut out.

No matter how popular the bill is with the committee, of course, it has a tough road to hoe. Congress will soon leave for its August recess. This will be followed immediately by the political campaign. Senate Republicans don’t want to see much passed before those elections.

In this case, their stalling could be doing us a favor.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years. At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog. DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air. My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994.
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Plariv
DanaBlankenhorn 6th Aug 2010
You can't leave yourself unprotected against people, or companies, that would poison you. Government must be big enough to enforce the law and protect citizens from all potential lawbreakers, or else it is soft on crime.

You want a gummint that's soft on crime? I don't.
0 Votes
+ -
What do you expect from government
mrlinux 4th Aug 2010
They are not about fixing the health care system, it is about creating a bill that the public believes is for health care reform and then fill it with pork and tax increases.
0 Votes
+ -
Have to agree.
cornpie 4th Aug 2010
@mrlinux Everything the government does turns into a haven for fraud, waste and abuse. I can't see how or why we should expect this to somehow be different.

What's the old saying about insanity being doing the same thing over and over (i.e. throw huge wads of government money at a problem) and expect a different result (i.e. it actually works and is free of fraud, waste and abuse)?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Hogzilla Hospital Stimulus Act
DanaBlankenhorn 4th Aug 2010
@cornpie That's not true and you know it. But it's a lot more fun to assume that's true and do nothing about it but complain, ignoring your responsibilities as a citizen in a democratic republic to make things better.

Aren't you one of those who keep telling us "freedom isn't free?" Well, it isn't. It comes with responsibilities, to keep a watchful eye on your tax dollars.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Hogzilla Hospital Stimulus Act
DanaBlankenhorn 4th Aug 2010
@mrlinux On this issue I have to agree. Industry has too much control over government, and if this thing passes it's just pigs feeding at the trough, not true reform.
0 Votes
+ -
@DanaBlankenhorn
mrlinux 4th Aug 2010
Where is the process is the public allowed to make those decisions ??? We are given a choice at election time between crook a and crook b.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Hogzilla Hospital Stimulus Act
DanaBlankenhorn 4th Aug 2010
@mrlinux The meaningful use regulations went through a 60 day comment period, open to the public. Just one example. Your local government has open meetings. State legislatures are easy to get into.

Oh, right, democracy's hard...
0 Votes
+ -
@DanaBlankenhorn No the issue is what you have to do to get campaign funds, the only way to get into office is to be someones puppet.
0 Votes
+ -
@DanaBlankenhorn and @mrlinux -- You're both missing the fundamental cause here. As long as The Gummint continues its headlong push to expanding its control, influence and power over Commercial Operations, then it reasonably follows that Commercial Operations will devote more and more of its resources, efforts and attention toward swaying The Gummint's largess toward its own benefit -- economic, regulatory or political -- a la "...you be nice to me, I'll be nicer to you...".

That's not only common sense...it's damned efficient!
0 Votes
+ -
Plariv
DanaBlankenhorn 6th Aug 2010
You can't leave yourself unprotected against people, or companies, that would poison you. Government must be big enough to enforce the law and protect citizens from all potential lawbreakers, or else it is soft on crime.

You want a gummint that's soft on crime? I don't.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix