What to buy and sell under health reform

By | March 24, 2010, 4:55am PDT

Summary: The early part of any economic recovery is always a good time to put money to work. It’s not only a rising tide that lifts many boats, but it’s also a great time for entrepreneurs with new ideas.

There are both winners and losers in health reform.

(The famous charging bull statue in Bowling Green, downtown Manhattan, often associated with Merrill Lynch, now part of Bank of America.)

Signing of the bill seemed to release some pent-up demand from investors yesterday, the Dow rising over 100 points. Markets like certainty, the signing of the bill delivers certainty, so now stocks can be evaluated again based on fundamentals.

Beyond that, you can expect some types of stocks to come under pressure.

  • Hospital equipment stocks, especially imaging companies and high-end gear makers like Intuitive Surgical, which has been like an Internet stock lately anyway (a P/E of 59 when Google’s is 26) are bound to come under pressure. Such purchases will need new justifications.
  • Name brand drug companies may have trouble over time, although shares like those of Merck are already pretty beaten down. (P/Es of 7 are usually reserved for cigarette and newspaper companies.) Expect slower growth as competition with generics grows.
  • Hospital companies, which may face a glut of beds. Expect some doctor-owned hospitals to come on the market, depressing values.

Sadness will not be universal. As David Ignatius of The Washington Post notes, “can anticipate a whole lot more government money headed its way.” Who stands to gain?

  • Health IT companies, which in addition to the stimulus may now get the chance to run health exchanges. Many of the largest imaging companies, like GE, have protected themselves against falling imaging revenues by innovating in IT with systems like Qualibria.
  • Some health insurers, especially those that can control costs through vertical integration, will benefit. Having a thumb on costs will become a clearer competitive advantage.
  • IT companies not now in health care, like payment processors, smart card providers, and others in back-end services, are going to see big contracts.
  • Nursing home companies with a wide variety of service levels, ranging from visiting nurses to intense nursing care, are going to benefit from having an assured flow of funds and new customers.
  • Generic drug makers are bound to see more prescriptions, not only as new customers come on who were previously uninsured, but as prescriptions for name brand alternatives come under pressure.

The early part of any economic recovery is always a good time to put money to work. It’s not only a rising tide that lifts many boats, but it’s also a great time for entrepreneurs with new ideas.

There are lots of opportunities for such entrepreneurs in health care. Some people are going to get rich. I doubt even the President would object if you are one of them.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a journalist, writer and part-time futurist for over 30 years. At the present moment I run only a personal blog in addition to my ZDNet open source blog. DanaBlankenhorn.Com has the subtitle The War Against Oil. In the past I have used it to write about political history, e-commerce, personal matters, some ideas related to open source, and The World of Always On, which is the idea of using sensors, motes and RFID to turn WiFi links into platforms for applications which live in the air. My IRA account at Schwab holds a few tech shares, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials, but there are no open source companies in it. I don’t even own any CBS stock.

Biography

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994.
29
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

There you go again Dana.
Wilson_J 28th Mar 2010
You're equating 'different opinions' with 'hate'. I know, I know.. that makes for an easy worldview where you don't have to think anymore, but it doesn't make it right.

Cool down, take your pill if needed.
0 Votes
+ -
The incentive to be entreprenural for the chance to become rich will slowly be sapped as the VAT (value added tax) is implemented to pay for this new entitlement.
0 Votes
+ -
You may have had too much tea
DanaBlankenhorn 24th Mar 2010
There are lots of financial analysts who disagree strongly with you. But disagreements are what make markets. You can't have everyone trying to buy and see prices rise. You need some to say sell.
0 Votes
+ -
And you may have had too much koolaid
bobc4012@... 24th Mar 2010
Are those the same analysts that were telling people to buy at the height of the market before the collapse? Were those the same analysts who "saw the financial industry problems" and told people to "buy"? Apparently, they have their heads up that bull's behind. The (Democrat) Senate is already talking VAT to pay for the huge debt they and the President ran up (more than all the previous years combined). Just keep in mind, the aim of this administration and its Democrat Socialist/Communist minions is to redistribute wealth from those who earned it to those who have not. I hope it is your wealth that they redistribute and not my meager hard-earned savings.
0 Votes
+ -
Your question about analysts
DanaBlankenhorn 25th Mar 2010
Some of these analysts were wrong on the 2008 economic collapse, which occurred after the Bush Administration doubled our national debt to pay for tax cuts and unfunded wars -- as well as Medicare Part D drug coverage.

Some are different.

When it comes to markets I take Paul Volcker's advice. The former Fed chair was asked by a lady during the Reagan years (he was Fed chair under Reagan) what stock prices would do. "Madam," he said, "they will fluctuate."

In general, you don't win by betting against America. We are a resilient people with a resilient economy. If you're looking for a second economic collapse at this point, I suspect you'll be disappointed.

Unless that is we take your advice and go back to Hoover economics.
0 Votes
+ -
Some information to add:
RaymondX0 25th Mar 2010
Part of the problem was that the banks were by law forced to lend to people who had no credibility to pay back. It was the political lefties with their rosy view of the world who pushed that legislation through. So banks were forced to create low quality credit.

This again shows that lefties cannot be trusted with money. They don't know anything about it - and if something doesn't go their way, they want to tax tax tax, or in this case force others to give away their money to people who can't pay it back.

(oh wait - it is of course 'racist' to not give a mortgage to a person when he makes only $10 per hour)
0 Votes
+ -
Health Reform Anti-communist
windhover03 28th Mar 2010
Strangely, this law will funnel a lot of money towards private companies... no government production of medicines, no gov't hospitals, no federal insurance option. Those are private interests, and they will all profit because the Democrats refused to consider socialist solutions.
0 Votes
+ -
statement has no value (tax)
windhover03 28th Mar 2010
A value added tax isn't applied on investments... This comment makes so little sense I don't know where to begin. I guess your saying a tax on sellable items will keep millionaires from enjoying their wealth? Or is this some sort of general margin of profitability argument?

Health reform is always proposed to do a job helping the needy, and it is always manipulated to help some set of the health market. In this case, there will be a whole new flood of customers, and another government fund to pay for things which couldn't otherwise be purchased. This article is correct. A lot of folks will benefit financially.
0 Votes
+ -
What to buy and Sell?
John Zern 24th Mar 2010
Organs?
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Body Parts
sirpaul1 24th Mar 2010
It's illegal to sell body parts in the U.S.A. (although females in Nevada are legally allowed to rent them).
-or-
Wurlitzer or Hammond are the best!
0 Votes
+ -
Sell USA stocks
Dorkyman 24th Mar 2010
Short-term, the jury is still out as to winners and losers. The courts may even step in and nullify the whole bill.

Long-term, if the new law survives, is bleak for the USA as it evolves down the road towards a cradle-to-grave Nanny State. Who will be dominant in 20 years? I would guess China.
0 Votes
+ -
China
TMANIAC 24th Mar 2010
First part is right, if you are trying to make money here the current government will do all it can to take it from you.

If you liberal wankers on this site like supporting other people then join the shrinking ranks of the left.

China not likely though, they look like a powerhouse right now but they have huge internal problems.
0 Votes
+ -
I have to agree...that's a bubble that "may" pop
TheBottomLineIsAllThatMatters 24th Mar 2010
even though they Gov't in all it's stupidity seems to understand the mess they are creating, and could help. I just love working my butt off so the people who feel the need for the Gov't to take care of them (talking able bodies here) can. I love the premise "You work hard for your stuff then I should have your stuff too, because it's not 'fair' "...sheesh. Wonder how many of the Pelosi Poodles (saw that yesterday that was Great!) will still be there when they have the hand in their wallest to pay for all of this crap.
0 Votes
+ -
Relax...
M.W.H. Updated - 24th Mar 2010
I live in Canada where we have been receiving government provided health care for several decades now and our economy is one of the strongest on the planet. Our GDP is growing nicely at the moment. How's yours doin'?

Most thinking people understand that a nation of sick, weak people cannot effectively compete. An arrogant attachment to the selfish notion that you are not your brother's keeper will be your downfall. Even Henry Ford understood that his success depended on the ability of his workers to buy a Ford so he paid them a living wage. A very controversial move at the time.

Have a look at this:

http://blogs.ngm.com/.a/6a00e0098226918833012876a6070f970c-800wi

This shows it all. U.S. citizens currently pay double what it costs in countries that provide Gov't sponsored health care and it appears they get nothing in return.

"Principles have no real force except when one is well-fed." - Mark Twain
0 Votes
+ -
Where our debt comes from
DanaBlankenhorn 25th Mar 2010
Do you need to be reminded again where our debts came from? It wasn't the "Pelosi Poodles." It was the Bush Administration that cut taxes, went to war without paying, and expanded Medicare through for-profit drug companies on your dime.

The purpose of health reform is to lower the deficit over time. The CBO (which you love when they agree with you and hate when they don't) estimates this will cut the deficit over time, at an increasing rate.

Now we can talk about the deficit all you like. When are you going to pay for what Bush spent? How are you going to pay for what Bush spent?
0 Votes
+ -
It comes from Obama, Dana.
RaymondX0 25th Mar 2010
You fail today - again I might add.

Facts are that Obama's additions to the national debt royally dwarf anything that Bush added.

Facts hurt liberals so try to resist the urge to start 'racist! racist!' and instead have the courage to examine the facts, and not get angry again. Resist it, and be changed to conform your thoughts to the facts. happy

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-trillions-dwarf-Bushs-dangerous-spending.html

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/
0 Votes
+ -
If you want to buy ideology, buy it
DanaBlankenhorn 28th Mar 2010
Ideology is a poor substitute for reality.

The Bush tax cuts added $1 trillion to the
deficit, the Iraq War another $1 trillion.
That's $2 trillion. The stimulus is $1 trillion.
And the CBO says the health care law just passed
actually cuts the deficit at an accelerating
rate over time.

Now if we can find a way to pay for that war,
and those tax cuts, we can get out of this hole.
But the hole gets bigger every year with
interest on past borrowings.

Most of the budget is on a glide path toward
balance, and when the annual hole is $1 trillion
you can't get to zero all at once without
upsetting the market.

Clinton economics worked in the real world.
Obama's will, too. Bush's, not so much. No jobs,
$2 trillion down the rathole, and no
conservative apparently honest enough to help
repay it. Or even admit it.

It's a Mad Hatter Tea Party.
0 Votes
+ -
Typical liberal reaction, Dana.
Wilson_J 28th Mar 2010
1) Ignore facts (the graphs are clear...)
2) Get angry

I guess the only thing missing is raging that he's a racist!

happy
0 Votes
+ -
Our trading partners are doing fine
DanaBlankenhorn 24th Mar 2010
The important thing is to get our total health care spending down as a percentage of GDP, to a level similar to that of our trading rivals.

The bill which just passed doesn't do that by itself. But combined with health IT and greater prevention we can bend the cost curve.

The key is having a thumb on the buyer's side of the scale. We haven't had that before.

But, again, disagreements make markets. You need bears for bulls to run. No bears, you see losses. Everyone was a housing bull in 2005.
0 Votes
+ -
LOL, if you do the President will just find a way to steal it from you.

Welcome to Amerika
0 Votes
+ -
What was stolen?
DanaBlankenhorn 24th Mar 2010
Other than our future with $1 trillion in tax cuts that weren't made up but instead put into $1 trillion of spending on Iraq?

People have short memories.
0 Votes
+ -
Tax cuts are the opposite of stealing.
RaymondX0 25th Mar 2010
It leaves people's money in their hands. In fact - history has shown time and time again that economic prosperity gets hurt when you increase taxes. But... that's of course not part of what they teach at Huffingtonpost. Dana t.r.u.l.y. believes that taxes lead to higher economic growth!

LOL!
0 Votes
+ -
The Laffer Curve
DanaBlankenhorn 28th Mar 2010
I actually had Arthur Laffer draw his famous
curve for me 30 years ago. It's a D sitting on
its back.

Which means there is a point where dropping tax
rates actually does drop revenue. Otherwise
you'd have infinite revenue at a tax rate of
zero.

So a Kennedy cut of 70% marginal rates to 50%
increased revenue, but a Bush cut to 15% on
capital gains reduces revenue.

It's your own theory. At least try to understand
your own theory. When you toss out your own
theories in the name of ideology you're getting
into Maoism. Just because Steve Forbes did a
satire of Mao's Little Red Book doesn't mean
you're ready for a Great Leap Forward.
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong, Dana.
Wilson_J 28th Mar 2010
You're free to call historically proven facts 'ideology' but it just makes you looks silly.

Need your pill already?
0 Votes
+ -
I think the author is correct. There may be excellent business opportunity here. I do not believe the courts will get into this. But I and others are exploring whether we have a legal case against our attorney general for trying to block this legislation while not providing a comparable coverage for the millions of uninsured in the state of Florida. He could better use his time trying to help lower the hazard insurance burden placed on Floridans instead.
0 Votes
+ -
The courts may indeed overrule this
DanaBlankenhorn 24th Mar 2010
I don't want to rain on a Democratic parade, but the courts have so shifted to the right over the last decade, especially the Supreme Court, that I can see a ruling striking down some or all of the new law.

But I see opportunity in that. Anger moves politics, as we've seen. Anger can even force a switch in time to save the nine.
0 Votes
+ -
You may be right.
windozefreak 24th Mar 2010
But, I'm going to have a little more faith in the Robed-Ones. Without a doubt I stand ready to be corrected.
0 Votes
+ -
Courts have corrected.
RaymondX0 25th Mar 2010
Of course they moved to the right. It's a natural reaction to a period of erroneous leftist views. Leftist views are like a fart in the wind; they stink - but they'll eventually go away.

Look at the hippies. Nothing left of that loser mentality.
0 Votes
+ -
You're right
DanaBlankenhorn 26th Mar 2010
The law and policy need constant adjustment. It's now being adjusted back to the left. For the same reason you cite. Today's haties are no different in their extremism from yesterday's hippies. If you're associated with them you don't notice, but the rest of us do.

The reform package that just passed is not "socialist." It's in line with past Republican proposals from Richard Nixon, Bob Dole and Mitt Romney. Yet see how it's being portrayed by the Republican leadership and its tea party followers -- you'd think it was written by Mao Zedong.

So the balance must be reset, and it will be. Until it goes too far the other way.
0 Votes
+ -
There you go again Dana.
Wilson_J 28th Mar 2010
You're equating 'different opinions' with 'hate'. I know, I know.. that makes for an easy worldview where you don't have to think anymore, but it doesn't make it right.

Cool down, take your pill if needed.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix