ie8 fix
madison

16:9 wide-screen looks narrow-minded compared to Philips Cinema 21:9 HDTV

By | January 30, 2009, 4:26pm PST

Summary: It’s getting harder to make an HDTV that really stands out, but Philips has gone to great lengths (well, widths) with a new set it’s recently unveiled. Forgoing the 16:9 wide-screen aspect ratio most new sets have, the Cinema 21:9, a 56-inch LCD, extends to nearly the same ratio as movies shot in the 2.39:1 [...]

It’s getting harder to make an HDTV that really stands out, but Philips has gone to great lengths (well, widths) with a new set it’s recently unveiled. Forgoing the 16:9 wide-screen aspect ratio most new sets have, the Cinema 21:9, a 56-inch LCD, extends to nearly the same ratio as movies shot in the 2.39:1 format.

For cinema buffs, that’s the good news. The bad news is that a Philips spokesperson has confirmed to me today that the set will not be made available in the U.S. According to Engadget, it will be available in select European countries this spring, at a price of £3,000 (or about 3,400 euros).

But the Cinema 21:9 could pave the way for other sets with this aspect ratio to be produced. While that format is perfect for many Hollywood films, there are plenty of video sources that aren’t shot in it. Philips says it’s using “highly advanced formatting technology” to convert 16:9 sources to fill the 21:9 screen, though how successful that adaptation is will probably determine whether the format will receive mainstream attention or be relegated to curiosity status.

The company promises more details about the set by the end of next month. In the meantime, you can get a brief glimpse of the Cinema 21:9 in this video clip Megawhat.tv made at the set’s London launch event.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.
12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

21:9 Why the hell?!
bojaka 14th Sep
When it should be called 7:3 >=/ 21:9 is like calling the 4:3, 12:9 instead. Sure if the standard was to make all the ratios with a 9 in the end, but that's not the case!
21:9... What a stupid, stupid way to write a ratio!!!

Really cool TV though and I like the 7:3 ratio!
0 Votes
+ -
Watching 4:3 content on it must suck
voyager529 31st Jan 2009
(nt)
0 Votes
+ -
not if you..
sfazly 3rd Feb 2009
can view two 4:3 contents at the same time
0 Votes
+ -
Not really, this TV has an upscaler build-in.
0 Votes
+ -
What about 1:85?
WindowWasher 5th Feb 2009
What about the remaining films shot in 1.85 ("flat") format? Not all films are shot in scope (2.39)
It's all about the real estate and boy the things I
would like to do with that extra real estate when
running in 4:3; have an onscreen channel guide without
covering over the picture, have supplementary info
playing on the borders maybe internet content like
Imdb or chat, maybe widgets. forget stretching and
squeezing I prefer correct proportions even if it
means blank space. "If you build it they will fill it
up"
Oh, how I'd love one of these TVs.

Although it's probably high on power demands, which puts me off with most current -large- flat panels.


Cinemascope is 2.35:1 and not 2.39

0 Votes
+ -
Black Bands
djivan@... 3rd Feb 2009
I really hate black bands on the left/right and top/bottom. Movies are not the only thing I watch, so this would annoy me most of the time.
0 Votes
+ -
no bars
nipsey russell 6th Feb 2009
your perspective is off. there arent black bands there, there just isnt any picture there. if you had a narrower tv there wouldnt be any picture there either.
and in other news, the Frozbozz LCD Company of
Wonderland came out with a curved 20 foot wide by
2 foot high display. How much further will this
"stretching" of the width be carried?
0 Votes
+ -
How far, you ask?
Worth2Cents 3rd Feb 2009
Imagine a cookout in your backyard. Kids splashing in the pool. Some friends over to watch the big game...and the whole backside of your house is a HDTV! Of course, to keep from bothering the neighbors, your guests have 7.1 earbuds.

A guy can dream, can't he?
0 Votes
+ -
April Fools? A misplaced Onion article? Haha, very funny..
0 Votes
+ -
21:9 Why the hell?!
bojaka 14th Sep
When it should be called 7:3 >=/ 21:9 is like calling the 4:3, 12:9 instead. Sure if the standard was to make all the ratios with a 9 in the end, but that's not the case!
21:9... What a stupid, stupid way to write a ratio!!!

Really cool TV though and I like the 7:3 ratio!

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix