ie8 fix
madison

HDTVs/Home theater at CES 2010: What are you most looking forward to?

By | January 4, 2010, 5:09pm PST

Summary: The annual tech lovefest better known as CES is kicking off in a couple of days, and you can probably already guess that the 2010 edition will be known as the 3D CES. The runaway success of Avatar is just the latest sign that 3D is going mainstream, and electronics companies will be falling all [...]

The annual tech lovefest better known as CES is kicking off in a couple of days, and you can probably already guess that the 2010 edition will be known as the 3D CES. The runaway success of Avatar is just the latest sign that 3D is going mainstream, and electronics companies will be falling all over themselves announcing products that will offer that third-dimension experience in your living room.

But 3D HDTVs aren’t the only thing of interest to home theater fans awaiting word from Vegas on new products. Will there be any other advancements in displays, like a new OLED announcement in a bigger size (the US market still only has a 11-inch, $2,500 Sony set available) or LED-backlit LCD sets that will start life costing less than $1,000 instead of being discounted at that price come the holiday season? How many more “connected” devices will be introduced that promise Internet access for streaming services and widgets? And will any promise to send HD wirelessly to your TV at a price point less than what a 40-inch set costs?

Like most of you, I won’t be in Vegas this time out, but I’ll be posting news as it reaches the wires. Turn to our ZDNet team who will be covering the show for on-the-floor impressions. In the meantime, let everyone know what you’re most excited about when it comes to CES HDTV and home theater news by voting in the below poll and posting in our TalkBack section.

Poll

What are you most looking forward to when it comes to CES 2010 news?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: HDTVs/Home theater at CES 2010: What are you most looking forward to?
nugget1961@... 6th Jan 2010
Unfortunately, 3D cannot be successfully viewed by 70% of the US viewers. Any problems with depth perception, cataracts or ocular implants will negate the 3D effect and you will see only a very blurry picture. As with the Avatar motion pix, theatre owners are refunding 3D movie patrons' money, so will TV producers be refunding the pricey costs of a 3DTV set. You would have thought the Engineering community would have thought of this little caveat since it has been a problem with 3D viewing for years!
W6OZZ
0 Votes
+ -
Don't need TV
no_barry_2012 4th Jan 2010
I do not need TV nor will I pay $$$ for one
when it is not necessary.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Don't need TV
fixmdude 6th Jan 2010
You don't need more than one pair of shorts either but they sure are nice to have.
Am I the only one that could care less for 3D movies? To me 3D is fine for short (8 - 10 min) films like A Bugs Life ride at Disney other than that, give me a regular movie any day of the week.

Bert
0 Votes
+ -
I was thinking . . .
JLHenry Updated - 5th Jan 2010
That any "3D" experience that requires me to wear an extra device (i.e., the glasses), ISN'T a true 3D TV.

I already wear glasses. Why should I have to wear a SECOND pair over my first just to watch TV? Especially if the shows all end up being the modern equivalent of Dr. Tongue's 3-D House of Stewardesses . . .

For those of you too young to remember:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_City_Television
Bert your opinion may change when you see Avatar in a theater equiped with the new digital 3D projection equipment and clear polarized shades. 3D isn't what it used to be with the red and blue paper shades. Avatar is a game-changer in 3D-marvelism.
0 Votes
+ -
Don't think so.
Unfortunately, 3D cannot be successfully viewed by 70% of the US viewers. Any problems with depth perception, cataracts or ocular implants will negate the 3D effect and you will see only a very blurry picture. As with the Avatar motion pix, theatre owners are refunding 3D movie patrons' money, so will TV producers be refunding the pricey costs of a 3DTV set. You would have thought the Engineering community would have thought of this little caveat since it has been a problem with 3D viewing for years!
W6OZZ

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix