ie8 fix
madison

Movie studios rolling out premium video on demand titles for $30 starting next month

By | April 1, 2011, 3:44am PDT

Movie studios have been mulling over the idea of releasing “new” movies via video on demand for a premium fee, but now it looks like they’re finally ready to test this concept out. According to Variety, four major studios are launching a new brand later this month to release recent flicks on VOD for $30 a pop.

Fox, Sony, Universal, and Warner Bros. have created the Home Premiere brand, which will begin offering titles in April to all DirecTV customers. Comcast will also be testing the service in select cites, though there’s no apparent time table for when and if it will roll out the service nationwide. Paramount is opting out of Home Premiere for fear it will increase piracy.

Two films are slated to kick off the service: Adam Sandler’s latest, Just Go With It, and Liam’s Neeson’s Unknown. Both have already earned most of their box office money, which is part of the studio’s plan: Release movies to Home Premiere two months after their theatrical debut in order not to cannibalize box office receipts. Nonetheless, movie theater owners are worried that people may get used to the idea of waiting for films to show up for premium VOD rental and go to the theaters even less than they already are.

While $30 is still a hefty sum to drop for one VOD title, it’s a little more palatable than the $50 per pop that Time Warner’s CEO suggested late last year. Considering that you’d probably pay a lot more for four people to go to the movies, it may be a bargain for families looking to watch a recent flick. Still, the 60-day window is only 30 days before new films are typically released on DVD and Blu-ray, which you can then rent from Redbox for $1 instead.

Would you pay $30 for a new film on Video on Demand instead of seeing it at the movies? If not, what price would entice you to do so? Sound off in the Comments section.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
36
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Movie studios rolling out premium video on demand titles for $30 starting next month
non-biased 7th Apr 2011
I don?t see myself using it much if at all but would like to have the option. If it were maybe two weeks after theatrical release and $10 cheaper I could see myself using it at least once a month assuming something came out I want to see. $30 and 30 days after release is a harder pill to swallow but something I might consider from time to time. It costs the wife and I at least $30 to go out to a movie and I hate crowds. I have a 106? screen and a pretty good surround sound system so while not the same as the theater it?s pretty close with the added benefits of not having to deal with others, eat & drink whatever we want, start/pause/stop whenever we want. I can see those as sellable points for me to do it from time to time. Only about 5-10% of the movies I see are in the theater anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
In most cases if I'm going to wait 60 days for this I may as well wait 30 more and get it at a significantly lower price.
Exactly. If I can wait 60 days, I can wait another 30 days to rent it for $5.99 instead of $29.99. I would, however, pay $30 or even $50 to watch it the same opening weekend. I would even do it for the following Monday and let the theater owners have the weekend exclusively. Then maybe $39.99 for 10 days after opening weekend so they can have two weekends exclusively. $29.99 for 60 days delay when it will be $5.99 30 more days later just doesn't make sense.
The only way I would pay $30 for a VOD Title is if it was blockbuster (Not the Video Store) movie and was released to $30 VOD a Few days after being released in the theaters.
If not, and for me it's a must see Now movie, I will go to the theater. If it's not a must see now movie I'll wait for it to hit Netflix or Redbox.
Also I need to be able to stream from my Xbox or Roku Box because I am already kicking the Cable/Satellite addiction, way to expensive for what you get, and I am not adding Cable back and renting a box just to see a movie a month earlier!
This just go's to show how disconnected the studio execs are if they really think people will pony up for this.
For $30 dollars my wife and I can go to the show and get drinks and popcorn and only spend a couple of bucks more, and we get the big screen and the good sound system. So I do not see this as a viable business model.
@mrlinux ding ding. movie tix around here are $10/ea and i consider that expensive. why would i wait for 2mo, pay 33% more (if 2 ppl), instead of paying $20 and seeing it OPENING NIGHT?
@bc3tech That's what I thought I said. The movie theater by us has a deal 2LG Drinks (free refills) and a large popcorn(0.25 cent refills) for 12 dollars + tickets.
@mrlinux
That is exactly the reason why I won't pay $30 for VOD. Its cheaper for me to catch the matinee and get the refillable large popcorn and drink.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
non-biased Updated - 12th Apr 2011
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
$30 Depends
Nesivos 1st Apr 2011
If it is a winter release of something I really want to see and the weather is lousy then maybe

On the other hand.

If I have a big screen TV then I can invites some friends over to watch it with.

Two couples comes to $7.50 each. Throw in some cheap fresh home made popcorn along with some beer and it sounds like a steal of a deal.
@Nesivos
Or... download a good cam for free.

I'm not watching a movie in my home for $30. Not worth the price for the quality.

$10 bucks a pop is barely worth it for theater sized screen and really good sound.
0 Votes
+ -
HELL NO
bobiroc 1st Apr 2011
$30 are they crazy? Sorry but I rather wait until it comes to Blu-Ray/DVD and rent it. I rarely go to the theater and if I do it is usually go to the early shows to avoid the crowd and for the cheaper tickets. But seeing as I have a HD Big Screen TV and a digital sound system I am content to watch it at home most of the time when I can buy the Movie for $20 and own it or get it as part of my Netflix subscription and watch it.

On a related note I have DirectTV and I hate their VOD service and the fact that they call me 3 times a month and email me about their stupid PPV movies and crap. I have asked it to stop but it does not. I actually made a custom guide to get hide all those channels since they lump them right in the middle of everything.
Sounds like it could give the Movie Theaters a little competition (although the REALLY Big Screen is hard to beat). Sounds like it is going to be TOO expensive for most people's taste. $30 a month is about the cost to take a family of 4 to the movies (just Admission Costs) so it MIGHT be able to compete for some, as long as there is a decent stream of movies that come along. If nothing else, it may cause Movie Theaters to keep their prices a little more in check which wouldn't be bad.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: $30 a month
AboveAverageJoe 1st Apr 2011
@jkohut It is not a subscription plan like Netflix with more recent movies for $30 a month. According to this article it is "recent flicks on VOD for $30 a pop."
DOA as far as I am concerned.
@jkohut: If nothing else, it may cause Movie Theaters to keep their prices a little more in check which wouldn't be bad.

But the grossly inflated prices for the concessions. I've heard this is where theaters make their money but I suspect they'd make more if they lowered their prices as people would be willing to buy more.

And while I'm on the subject would it hurt to hire people who can move at anything more than a snails pace?

/end rant
0 Votes
+ -
Not interested.
alsw 1st Apr 2011
If it's a special effects movie, I'll spend the few extra bucks and see it on a big screen and good sound. I'll sneak in my own drinks to save money.

Anything else, I wait for the DVD/Blu-Ray.

I wouldn't even do the couples or friends thing ( lots of people in the same living room to potentially split the cost ). There are lots of movies out there on DVD I can get the same level of enjoyment with my friends, even if a few of them have seen the movie before.
0 Votes
+ -
only if 1-2 week from premiere
tiderulz 1st Apr 2011
I have 2 kids, so when we go to the movies, we are paying for 4 tickets plus extras (drinks, snacks, etc), but i am not waiting 60 days to still pay $30. If it was 1 week or at the most, 2 weeks from premiere, then i would consider, otherwise, i would either watch it on the big screen or wait for DVD. I would not pay that high a price to watch it 60 days out.
no way.. I can wait the time to see it no matter what the movie
No, I wouldn't pay. If it's a movie I want to see right away and have the full experience, I'll go to the theater. Otherwise, I'll wait for the DVD via Redbox or Netflix. Most movies aren't worth the cost of admission.
0 Votes
+ -
Support Your Local Theaters
TJWJ 1st Apr 2011
Keep in mind that when you pay that $30 to Fox, Sony, Universal and WB your taking it away from the local theaters, the employees that work there and the community as a whole.
0 Votes
+ -
Hilarious
thombone 1st Apr 2011
$30??

HAHA! Good luck with that, you greedy &%#^@'s.

You guys should pay ME $30 to suffer through the trash you've been putting out lately.
0 Votes
+ -
VOD Price too high
sboverie 1st Apr 2011
I agree with previous posters that even $10 per ticket is too high. Why would paying triple, after the movie is released 60 days later, be considered reasonable? I prefer to wait until the movie is released to video and get a better price.
heck i can go watch a new movie at the theater here from monday-thursday for $4 before 6pm so that vod is a waste of time and well not worth it
All it will mean is that decent copies will be released to torrent sites about a month earlier
Too expensive, too limited, and that's PER VIEWing! Having friends over to watch too does NOT change what I paid unless I want to charge my friends to view it!
It won't work at all, IMO.
0 Votes
+ -
Why even make this open for comments? DO A SURVEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Possible scenereos:

* Date night: Maybe. But it is only slightly more to see it on a big screen + we get away from the kids.
* Movie with the kids: No. They don't want to stay home, they want out of the house.
* Guys/Girls night out: No chance. We want to get away from the kids.

I don't see a use case for this business model. Besides, if I have waited two months already, what is one more?
My price point would be around $20.00. I really don't mind waiting until films come out on dvd and blu-ray. That time gives me ample time to read reviews and ponder whether or not a film would be a waste of time and money.
Uh, you got a few things wrong with the timeline. First off, the 90 day release window for DVD/Blu-ray is more the exception. The typical home video release window is 120 days after the theatrical release.

Also, with regard to Netflix and Redbox, you forgot that those services agreed to a 28-day delay on new releases from most of the major studios.
Are they out of their friggin minds? $30 for a movie? No wonder the movie industry is so screwed up. They can't honestly think that any rational person will go for that. When you bring it down to $1 a movie, call me. We MIGHT do business. Until then, you need to hire some sane people in your industry. No wonder netflix is so popular.
$30 for a movie? No wonder their business is in the crapper.
0 Votes
+ -
30:30 profit?
zaghy2zy 1st Apr 2011
NOPE, bring it down to 15 then we'll talk if I'll watch it or not. 30 for the a family of 4 30 days after is a NO. If it was 3-10 days, then maybe sure I'll consider it. Even if we can tell it's cheaper at certain circumstances, we'd rather go out and watch it in the theaters (and have fun a whole family being out) than to wait 30 days, pay 30 dollars for a one time chance to watch it. If we can wait 30 days, then we'd just wait for it for the next 60 days and get the blu-ray or dvd cheaper, and be able to play it back as much as we want when we want.

If they seek profit, they should actually consider a way for us to actually pay for something. If they don't, their profit seeking ideas won't even turn up a profit at all.
I don't pay the outrageous price at the movies to see it first and they want us to pay $30?
So long as my Blockbuster store is open, I will pay them $30 to rent as many titles I want. Granted I can't say I seen it the day it released but, I'm saving a boat load of $$ compared to many of you that visit the theater often.
0 Votes
+ -
TOO EXPENSIVE
Keeping Current 2nd Apr 2011
Matin?e tickets are only $5 each so I can take my family of 4 to the movie when it comes out for $20. And lets face it, for the comparison here it is ticket price vs VOD price. Popcorn and drinks are nice to haves but not a must. For me, the price would have to be closer to $10 a pop and MUCH closer to the release date (what the theaters fear).
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe $20 IF I get to keep it
Get-Smart 4th Apr 2011
No way would I pay $30 for a one-time viewing. If I got to keep a copy and burn it onto DVD, I MIGHT pay $20, competitive with the DVD market. But I probably wouldn't do that either because I have a couple options: 1. My wife and I can go the end-run theatre and pay $6 to watch it 4-6 weeks after opening; 2. wait 60-90 days and rent it for $1 from RedBox.

The economics don't justify $30. They would be better off charging $5 per view to a mobile device and probably get more mileage. Not from me, though.
I don?t see myself using it much if at all but would like to have the option. If it were maybe two weeks after theatrical release and $10 cheaper I could see myself using it at least once a month assuming something came out I want to see. $30 and 30 days after release is a harder pill to swallow but something I might consider from time to time. It costs the wife and I at least $30 to go out to a movie and I hate crowds. I have a 106? screen and a pretty good surround sound system so while not the same as the theater it?s pretty close with the added benefits of not having to deal with others, eat & drink whatever we want, start/pause/stop whenever we want. I can see those as sellable points for me to do it from time to time. Only about 5-10% of the movies I see are in the theater anyway.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix