ie8 fix
madison

Turn it down! FCC approves new rules to quiet noisy TV commercials

By | December 15, 2011, 5:15am PST

Summary: When you’re not fast forwarding through commercials during shows recorded on your DVR, you may have noticed that some pesky ads try to blast into your brain by being 10 decibels louder than the show you’re watching. Thanks to the FCC, you’ll no longer have to scramble for your remote to quickly turn the volume [...]

When you’re not fast forwarding through commercials during shows recorded on your DVR, you may have noticed that some pesky ads try to blast into your brain by being 10 decibels louder than the show you’re watching. Thanks to the FCC, you’ll no longer have to scramble for your remote to quickly turn the volume down.

In what can only be called a Christmas miracle, the commission was actually unanimous (for once) in its support of new rules that will make cable operators and TV stations ensure that commercials are not louder than the show you’re watching. The new rules follow Congressional action last year that gave the FCC authority to create the regulations. If you get your service from a smaller cable operator, a loud commercial could slip through, however, because it will be required to make fewer spot checks than the big boys.

The only bad news (except maybe for desperate advertisers) is that the new rules won’t go into effect until next December. So we’ll have to endure another 12 months of ear-shattering ads, but next year TV viewers will be getting a sweet holiday gift.

[Via The Wall Street Journal]

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
38
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Turn it down! FCC approves new rules to quiet noisy TV commercials
transcenden 22nd Dec
The first regulation I've agreed with probably in the last 10 years. Most just hinder economic development, invade personal privacy, cause inefficiencies and just generally annoy the people. Amazing that it comes from the same organization who totally screwed up the Lightsquared-GPS issue.
I couldn't agree more. It's a miracle. With the exception of live sports I rarely watch programming in its original schedule.
@esadajr The word MUTE has been worn off the button on all of my remotes.
0 Votes
+ -
Mine keep breaking off
klumper Updated - 15th Dec
@thetwonkey

Due to overuse. sad
0 Votes
+ -
Amen
klumper 15th Dec
@Pete "athynz" Athens

Miracles can happen. We finally have proof.
0 Votes
+ -
Verizon does something right
Robert Hahn 15th Dec
Since switching to FIOS from DirecTV last year, we have found this to be much less of a problem. We were regularly blasted out of our chairs by ads on DTV. The only thing that does that on FIOS is the "test of the emergency broadcast system" buzzer that comes on around 2am to remind you that you fell asleep during the news.
I guess this means I can't watch my Dad slowly fall asleep to a boring movie, only to literally jump out of his chair when it switches to commercials that are a hundred times louder.
By the time the regulation takes effect we will have all forgotten about it passing. Why the 1 year delay?
Not to slam Apple, but their latest iPod Touch commercial definitely qualifies. Yes the tune is kinda catchy and fun, but it is LOUD compared to everything before and after it.
Umm...you mean people actually WATCH tv anymore? Really? I haven't watched regular tv since the whole "digital converter box" fiasco (and the constant obasms that were filling the airwaves at the time). Nope. I've got dvd's I can watch, and an occasional show online. I'm amazed lack of tv share hasn't run more stations into the ground. Society has changed over the last 25 years, and tv is no longer the "necessity" it once was.
0 Votes
+ -
Ends justifying the means?
littlemas2 15th Dec
Okay, I hate noisy commercials, but I hate government intrusion into my life even more. Why the heck does the Federal Government think it has the right to determine the noise level of a commercial sent to me a private individual from a private company? The commercials help pay for the free or very cheap (if on cable) program. If the TV producers want to take the risk of offending their customers by making the commercials, why should they not have that right?

Having the government regulate the wireless spectrum makes some sense, but regulating the content or how the content is delivered is simply another step down the road to totalitarianism.

This seems like just a simple little intrusion, but what happens when some bureaucrat somewhere decides to make some decision that you don't like, because they think most people will like it. I mean if they can already decide how loud my commercials are, what is to stop them from deciding what commercials, shows, news, etc. that I can see or listen to? I mean most people don't like those extremist on either the left or the right, so wouldn't it make sense to make sure that I don't ever have to be annoyed by them again?
@littlemas2@... .You make some good points but I almost quit watching TV just because the commercials are so loud. I just watch the news and if I find something good on a station I watch it till the first commercial comes on and if it's loud I just shut it off and go do something else. Funny thing is I would actualy watch the commercial if it wasn't so loud.

In this case I think they did the right thing. And I'm glad except for waiting a year to enjoy TV again. Oh and another thing, I don't buy any products if they have loud commercials.
littlemas2, they make devices to help regulate the volume for the loud commercials, I doubt you will be able to find one to raise the volume for you.
@littlemas2@... Sure - end all government regulations! No more clean air & water, food that makes us ill or even kills us, drugs unregulated, no more safe cars, or any safe products for that matter! If Ron Paul should get elected (slim chance) he would do everything possible to remove all regulations.
0 Votes
+ -
It's about time our government puts the will of the people ahead of advertising dollars!

The one question that I have is whether or not this applies to online streaming (e.g. WatchESPN, Hulu, etc.). Does the FCC have the ability to regulate commercial volume in streaming broadcasts as well?
Why give them so long? 1 month to implement should be more than enough.
@cmwade1977 ...Yes I agree 100% One month is even too long but I could handle that. lol.
@cmwade1977
They could turn the switch down tomorrow. This is nothing more than volume gouging the customer for as long as they can get away with it.

Dirty corporate slime
Great idea, but ya gotta wonder how any reasonable consumer might go about proving a violation.... Sure we can submit complaints, but what are the chances the FCC will actually budget any manpower to check out complaints. Looks all political to me.
@Willnott ....The folks at FCC watch TV too so when a couple of them get blown off the couch I think they will go that extra mile just to thank them for ruining a good evening.
(*grin*)
I pay Comca$t for the 3 channels I watch plus the 99 others on my very basic service. Dear FCC...ala carte, please!

whoa...I used "service" in a sentence with "Comcast"...didn't think that was possible...
how will they enforce this?
Sounds good....but nothing will change. We now have a society of many rules, and little enforcement. The "Do Not Call" program was a bust. I'm on that list, but solicitors still call me every day. I report them as abusers at donotcall.gov and nothing happens.

With all the criminal activity in the banking sector that has left thousands homeless and jobless, nobody at the banks is accountable, or in jail.

This ruling, like most others that apply to the corporations who know how to escape accountability for their bad deeds, will simply be ignored. Keep your remote handy.
Great news Sean!!!
Great news Sean!!!
Great news Sean!!!
Great news Sean!!!
0 Votes
+ -
Oh Boy !! Good TV Again !!
Rick Sos 15th Dec
My mother is in an old folks home and can't watch TV because she has to have it loud to start with and when a commercial comes on it disturbs the folks on either side of her. Makes for a boring existance sitting in silence because of stupid in your face commercials.

I'm hard of hearing too and the commercials hurt my ears so I just shut the damn thing off. I'm down to just watching the news. I hope the TV stations don't wait the whole year to conform.
0 Votes
+ -
_____________ TV? __________________
fm-usa Updated - 15th Dec
.
.
.
I haven't watched much TV this past year.
GEE... why is that?
.
Too many commercials.
Commercials are intrusive.
Commercials are almost all childish.
Commercials getting louder and louder! WHY? I'm not deaf. (these programmers must be trying to make me deaf)
Commercials have little value to/in my lifestyle.
PAID PROGRAMMING!!! W.T.F.!!! All it is, is a 30 to 60 minute commercial for one product. I actually sat through one once, the info was repeated 6 times.
.
I'm (was) paying for programming, not EXCESSIVE commercials. Commercials are not programs. Yes adverts pay for these programs BUT there is a limit to what the receiver will bear. When this amount of adverts hit 20 minutes per-hour is when I started to wean off TV. The last couple years was almost nothing but Discovery, Weather, World News, History and the animal shows. The rest of the programs are mindless dribble.
There is a limit to this madness, it used to be great when the amount of commercials was 11.5 minutes per hour. Since then it's grown to the point these very programmers are choking off there livelihood. (they should start with choking off their own airways first!!!)
.
In my opinion, the realistic amount of adverts should be limited to 15% per hour. That's 9 minutes of commercials per-hour.
HEY!!! If waitresses and waiters have to live on 15% ...... SO CAN THESE PROGRAMMERS.

.
.
.
@fm-usa

Adding insult to injury, we as consumers are the ones who pay for the additional 8.5 minutes per hour through higher retail prices. Of course we are also paying for the increased complexity in product packaging (artwork, container size, materials used in the containers) that we end up just throwing away (The gods MUST be crazy!!!).
0 Votes
+ -
How will it work?
MJG2112 15th Dec
"...ensure that commercials are not louder than the show you???re watching."

Since there is a dynamic range to a show's volume level, what will be the criteria for establishing the level for comercials? I can see where the peak show level might be used in ads with a much lower dynamic range which would effectively result in commericials having an average gain than that is higher than the average volume on the shows.
You lucky Yanks. Our government in UK is to timid (except fixing their salaries) to bring in such laws
You lucky Americans! Over here in UK our government is either in the pockets of the media or is dead scared of them
Finally, however, it backfires for a lot of them. I know several people - myself included - that refuse to buy anything from the "advertisers", or the stations that allow it.
It's funny that tax hikes go into effect right away but this takes a year.
The first regulation I've agreed with probably in the last 10 years. Most just hinder economic development, invade personal privacy, cause inefficiencies and just generally annoy the people. Amazing that it comes from the same organization who totally screwed up the Lightsquared-GPS issue.
The first regulation I've agreed with probably in the last 10 years. Most just hinder economic development, invade personal privacy, cause inefficiencies and just generally annoy the people. Amazing that it comes from the same organization who totally screwed up the Lightsquared-GPS issue.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix