Columbia law professor Tim Wu has a brilliant essay at Slate entitled Does YouTube Really Have Legal Problems? How the Bell Lobby helped midwife YouTube.
Issue-spotting the Live Web, attorney Denise Howell muses about cutting edge technology-related legal issues.
<p>Denise Howell is an appellate, intellectual property and technology lawyer who enjoys broad industry recognition for her expertise on the intersection of emerging technologies and law. For further details please see her <a href="http://www.bagandbaggage.com/practice/">professional background</a> and <a href="http://www.bagandbaggage.com/speaking/">speaking schedule</a>.</p> <p>Denise's career is characterized by her passionate engagement in intellectual property issues, technology, media, and all forms of online communication. She writes one of the first law-related weblogs, <a href="http://bagandbaggage.com/">Bag and Baggage</a> and coined the term "blawg" as shorthand for legal weblog. She hosts <a href="http://twit.tv/twil">this WEEK in LAW</a> on <a href="http://twit.tv/">TWiT,</a> probing the areas where technology and society intersect in ways that present new, unique, or difficult issues under existing and developing law, and has a further audio series at IT Conversations, <a href="http://soundpolicy.net/">Sound Policy</a>. She is a regular columnist for The American Lawyer magazine. Denise is a member of the <a href="http://identitygang.org/">Identity Gang</a>, <a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/projectvrm/Main_Page">Project VRM</a>, a board member of the <a href="http://attentiontrust.org/">Attention Trust</a>, and an advisory board member of <a href="http://lisensa.com/">Lisensa</a>/<a href="http://www.toptensources.com/">Top Ten Media</a> and the <a href="http://lpig.org/">Law and Policy Institutions Guide</a></p>
Reuters held a Newsmaker Event in New York recently it would have been interesting to attend; but for it being on an inconvenient coast I gladly would have gone:PUBLIC FIGURES, PRIVATE LIVES -A panel of experts debate how far the media should delve into the private lives of public figures*Do celebrities and politicians have a right to private lives?*Where does the public interest argument stop?
From the Center for Citizen Media comes this call for questions in advance of the November 7 general elections:Lots of bloggers are planning to cover the 2006 general elections on November 7. But what are the legal issues that you need to understand?
Jason Calacanis has never made a secret of his views on whether distributing full content via RSS entails any implied license. His answer?
As I mentioned last week, the most telling insights for me on the news of Google's acquisition of YouTube came from EFF's Fred von Lohmann, who discussed the importance for a company like Google of participation in the judicial lawmaking process. Members of Google's legal team underscore this point in their comments to New York Times writer Katie Hafner for her story, We're Google, So Sue Us:Michael Kwun, a senior litigation counsel at Google, agreed that "the Geico case was very important.
...if I weren't primarily on sick child duty this week: CC Chapman knows more about podcasts and music licensing than just about anyone, so when he talks about the two it's well worth a listen.
It's no surprise to me that a big player plaintiff was imminently to press the issue of whether online video sharing sites may shelter safely within the DMCA's safe harbor provisions. But why would Universal Music choose Grouper, a recent Sony acquisition, as a defendant?
Second Life and similar virtual worlds give rise to a seemingly endless stream of provocative legal issues, and now it seems even Congress agrees. Techmeme is highlighting a complementary duo of stories on this day that happens to be the deadline for filing an '05 U.
This is the way a titan ends, not with a bang, but with a squadron of emaciated temps brought in to march picket-like promotional signs up and down Newport Boulevard (and no doubt Sunset Boulevard); sullen attendants in a funeral procession.As Charles Andrews writes,If you read the business pages, it was not news that giant music retailer Tower Records was in trouble.
There has been no shortage of reportage concerning the official transfer of YouTube's copyright concerns to the Googleplex. See, e.
Professor Tim Wu and programmer Stuart Sierra have launched Project Posner, a searchable database of legal opinions authored by jurist and blogger Richard A. Posner.
Victor Cajiao of the Typcial Mac User Podcast and others, unpacks the last year's worth of growth in the iTunes podcast directory:When the iTunes Music Store (ITMS) indroduced podcasting last year it quickly provided more than 8,000 podcasters with a place to tell their stories. Today I checked the iTunes Music Store and counted the total number of podcast.
Wikipedia cites Mr. Spock's goatee from the original Star Trek series episode Mirror Mirror as "a part of popular culture as a satirical symbol of evil and normality run amok.
Continued coverage of the AttentionTrust luncheon follows:Comments from Seth Goldstein: Seth discusses attention attributes that have quantified value, email addresses, etc. On the Internet, our gestures (what we do, what we don't do) form this mass of data.
I'm here at an AttentionTrust luncheon, featuring a talk by Michael Goldhaber and some AttentionTrust and GestureBank related announcements. Dan Farber is here as well, so check his blog for related coverage (and his photos are included below).
The best of ZDNet, delivered
- 1 Contribute to the Election Day Bloggers' Legal Guide
- 2 Public figures, private lives, amorphous standards, and indeterminate laws
- 3 YouTube Muppet parody mayhem
- 4 Michael Crook gets publicity as defendant, but probably has no publicity defense
- 5 Edelman on mistakes, social media, and not being this decade's spam