73% Oracle customers upgrade to stay supported, no reported ROI

73% Oracle customers upgrade to stay supported, no reported ROI

Summary: The latest upgrade survey published by Oracle User Group Survey does not make good reading for Oracle or its customers.

TOPICS: Oracle

A report from Oracle Application User Group and sponsored by Oracle entitled ERP Upgrades: What's Your Philosophy? makes stunning reading. The report, which runs 33 pages and is graphics heavy kicks off with a masterful piece of spin:

Moving to the latest release of an enterprise application suite (enterprise resource planning, or ERP system) is often perceived as a daunting task in the popular imagination. Fears are further exacerbated by media and analyst reports of such projects as expensive and invasive time-sinks that take up the attention of the business. However, a new survey of enterprise application managers finds that the vast majority of ERP upgrade efforts tend to be short in duration, fall within reasonable budgets, and rarely disrupt the business at large.

Also contrary to perceptions, many ERP upgrades benefit the entire business, not just IT departments. Once properly executed, initiatives to improve and update ERP systems can be far reaching, providing enterprises with improved productivity, greater streamlining, and more robust capabilities for reaching out and serving new markets and constituencies.

That sounds hopeful doesn't it? But when you dig into the numbers a very different picture emerges from the 327 enterprise customers surveyed. The key takeaways per the report for my purposes:

Close to half of respondents intend to move to the latest release of their enterprise/ERP suite within the next two years. While it’s inevitable that end-of-support will drive many upgrade decisions, respondents are anxious to be able to access new functionality, as well as implement applications that will boost their users’ productivity.

What the highlights don't say is that 73% cited 'end of support' as a compelling reason to upgrade their ERP suite. 40% anticipate better functionality but only 20% were preparing for Fusion applications. (Multiple answers were permitted.) That cannot be good news for Oracle, which has been trying to get traction for Fusion. You can argue that this is a relatively new suite so you would not expect the numbers to be that great. But then Oracle has expended plenty of effort marketing the Fusion message and has actively encouraged its largest partners to bang the drum on its behalf.

It doesn't get any better once you start examining the scope of upgrade. See the next illustration:

The typical length of time for an enterprise/ERP upgrade is between six and 12 months, as cited by 44 percent of respondents. A third of respondents overseeing limited upgrades (confined to technical or functional upgrades), completed their projects in less than nine months’ time. For a majority of respondents, disruptions to their businesses were minimal; close to half say they experienced five or fewer days of disruption or downtime.

What the highlights don't say is that 44% of respondents took more than 12 months to upgrade including a staggering 13% not knowing how long it took. Where the scope of upgrade was deemed transformational, 60% took more than 12 months. Even where the upgrade was technical 28% took more than 12 months. A whopping 34% of those undertaking an ERP upgrade did not know or were unsure about the length of business disruption.

Even more worrying is that a full 47% of respondents upgrading ERP did not know the total cost of upgrade, with 23% saying it cost more than $1 million. That lack of visibility was pretty much across the board with 30% of business employing more than 5,000 people reporting an unsurprising $1 million plus bill. In that same group, 47% didn't know the cost of upgrade.

Despite the report's attempted spin about value, 54% of those implementing within an ERP footprint were not implementing additional modules. Those who were implementing new were either in the low teens for financials (10%) or single digits for new projects, procurement, CRM and HCM.

The one staggering omission from this report is that the survey never asked about the ROI of upgrading. In other words, the survey has carefully avoided one of the most critical questions that any CIO should be able to answer.

By any measure, these statistics make damning reading. You can look at them a number of ways:

  • Customers are hoping and praying they don't get left stranded so are forced into upgrade
  • The situation is so dire that many are throwing money at the problem without really thinking it through
  • Anticipated benefits are just that - faith based expressions of what Oracle will deliver as a result of the upgrade.
  • Fusion won't be going prime time anytime soon.

But then it is not all bad news:

I can't understand why customers feel compelled to pay for improved performance and scalability. In the SaaS/cloud world, your performance had better be world class or the application gets kicked to the curb. Scalability is taken for granted. Customers are anticipating new functionality as the headlines say but just how much? PeopleSoft HR customers for example have had precious little to show for their maintenance dollars since the company was acquired.

All of this will be good news for the third party maintenance brigade. Companies like Rimini Street, which is locked in legal proceedings with Oracle will see this as a gift. What better way to sell a value proposition than to beat Oracle over the head with its own customer data?

Topic: Oracle

Dennis Howlett

About Dennis Howlett

Dennis Howlett is a 40 year veteran in enterprise IT, working with companies large and small across many industries. He endeavors to inform buyers in a no-nonsense manner and spares no vendor that comes under his microscope.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Improved ease-of use

    My single biggest compelling reason to upgrade anything. But no one asks the end users.
  • Fusion

    I think Oracle Fusion must rate as one of the most misguided projects ever undertaken by a large software company.

    The majority of Oracle customers know how simple and elegant systems based on RDBMSs can be. They therefore understand that the gruesome complexity, unreliability, low productivity and dismal performance of Java based middleware is something that should not, under any circumstances, be allowed through the door.

    Not so much a recipe for disaster as a whole shelf full of cookery books for catastrophe.
  • Dennis Howlett: fear mongering or the voice of reason?

    That's the darn problem with analysts - letting facts get in the way of a perfectly good story. And, pointing out the Fusion hype-to-reality gap. (And, HANA, for that matter.) ERP vendors persist in spitting out "value propositions" in the face of high operating costs to customers:

    1. The benefit of upgrading something that finally works (or works well enough) means that there are diminishing, possibly negative returns to new versions.
    2. Maintaining customization across versions introduces cost and risk. That's something that many other vendors have taken a long and hard look at - sufficient adaptability without code.
    3. The maintenance model for ERP vendors is showing cracks: lack of innovation (why bother?), buying up other companies to capture customers, forced upgrades. SAP learned this lesson the hard way - my sense is that this was just the first salvo in the switch from vendor control to customer power.
  • ERP -- The Rest of the Story

    As radio personality Paul Harvey used to stay, this piece tells ???the rest of the story??? behind ERP.

    Don???t let the big ERP vendors lead you down the garden path. Because it???s expansive and an off-the-shelf offering, the feature/functions of must appeal to the greatest number of organizations. Maybe your company works just like the one imagined by the software developers. Probably not. So, you???re going to have to plan on PLENTY of customization.

    As you point out so well, then there???s upgrading ??? costly, time consuming, and with little measureable ROI. Don???t take my word for the high cost of change. Check out this IDC video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo8hZEWRV4E.

    There is an alternative technology strategy ??? Best of Class applications that allow your company to operate in the way that suits your business realities. That means no compromises and an IT infrastructure that supports your business, not one that forces you to retool your business to plug into how an ERP developer???s workflow. For more on Best of Class, go to http://www.unit4coda.com/why/best-of-class.
    Steve Pugh