Here is my opening salvo position:
The notion of a social enterprise is at best laughable and at worst ridiculous. Enterprises are artificial constructs designed with one purpose - the creation of wealth for the benefit of shareholders. The fact that such enterprises may employ people doesn't distract from the primary purpose. That's why we have hierarchies, rules, command and control. They serve to constrain people into behaving rationally and only for the benefit of the enterprise. Some argue that the very fact enterprises require people makes them social. That is a logical fallacy. The notion of a social enterprise is merely the latest in a long line of fashion driven management constructs designed to make employees believe that the enterprise cares. Which of course it doesn't. Instead it wants to suck more out of its employees. That's anti-social and makes the whole notion of a social enterprise impossible to achieve.
Remember this is a debate and not necessarily what I believe should be the endstate for any enterprise.
I'm sure Dion will regale us with wonderful tales of success. I have a few grenades of my own to lob into the discussion ring.
The debate page is live now but the opening statements won't be live on that page until Monday. Add it to your calendar. It will be a fun time.