Court rules in favor of FTC; says agency owns decision on Google enforcement

Court rules in favor of FTC; says agency owns decision on Google enforcement

Summary: A federal court Friday ruled that it does not have jurisdiction to intervene in the Federal Trade Commission's enforcement decisions in regards to a consent order in place with Google.


A federal court Friday sided with the Federal Trade Commission ruling the agency's decisions regarding enforcement of a privacy settlement with Google is not subject to judicial review, but the court left open the question of the search giant's decision to change its privacy policies.

The ruling came in a lawsuit filed earlier this month by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), which asked the Federal District Court in Washington, D.C., to compel the FTC to enforce a consent order against Google.

EPIC was seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The group said Google's plan to change its privacy policy in Mach violates the consent order. Google's policy changes are slated to go into effect Thursday.

The consent order is part of an October 2011 settlement in a privacy case between the FTC and Google where the search giant was found to have used deceptive privacy practices.

"We take our settlement orders very seriously, but only the FTC and not outside parties should be able to enforce them," said Claudia Ferrell, a spokeswoman for the FTC. "We are pleased that the Court has rejected EPIC's unwarranted attempt to interrupt the FTC's careful consideration of the announced changes in Google's privacy policies."

Since the lawsuit was filed, Google has been saying EPIC is "wrong on the facts and the law." The search giant's only comment Friday was a repeat of its statement that the changes make its privacy policy easier to understand and are a benefit to end users.

EPIC's executive director Marc Rotenberg said the research group plans to appeal the decision and ask a federal appeals court to rule "that courts can require federal agencies to enforce final orders."

Rotenberg said Judge Amy Berman Jackson, however, left open questions. He quoted her saying, "EPIC has advanced serious concerns that may be legitimate." He also said Jackson said "the Court has not reached the question of whether the new policies would violate the consent order or if they would be contrary to any other legal requirements."

And Rotenberg quoted Jackson saying, "the FTC, which has advised the Court that the matter is under review, may ultimately decide to institute an enforcement action."

Google created waves Jan. 24 when it announced it was consolidating it myriad of privacy policies into a single one and would look at users as one entity across all its service. The announcement touched off a privacy debate from Washington to the European Union and nearly everywhere in-between.

Topics: Google, Enterprise Software, Legal


John Fontana is a journalist focusing on authentication, identity, privacy and security issues. Currently, he is the Identity Evangelist for strong authentication vendor Yubico, where he also blogs about industry issues and standards work, including the FIDO Alliance.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • obvious outcome

    google is not guilty of anything and the instigators failed.
    The Linux Geek
    • Unfortunately though they won't just shut up and go away

      • neither will you two

      • Why should they just shut up and go away?

        The fact is that they should be able to force the FTC to adhere to their own rulings and enforce their own legal precedents.
  • Zen

    When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

    Zen moment.

    In this case, GOOGLE Corporation is very closely connected with government surveillance agencies
    (overt & clandestine/covert); Google works closely entwined with DARPA, NSA, DIA, & CIA PROJECTS --
    Google has fascist tendencies and displays monopolistic arrogance.
    In fact, Google deliberately offers ZERO Customer Service and has received
    extremely low ("terrible") ratings by the Better Business Bureau & other consumer organizations.
    Google execs. & behind-the-scenes players/manipulators also maintain a "special relationship" in bed with
    covert operations and the Russian-Israeli underworld. --
    Google and Mossad follow the same motto:
    "Deception is the art of war". --
    Google corporation is NOT your "friend"; the reality is that ruthless,
    sleazy, loutish, harmfully deceptive Google is cavalierly and amorally seeking to exploit you,
    conduct business espionage, etc.
    please be aware.

    • Thank you....

      Thank you for your public announcement, now back to regular programming.