Cablegate: One year on, the changing face of journalism

Cablegate: One year on, the changing face of journalism

Summary: Is an increasingly digital network of information changing, amid the aftermath of the Wikileaks 'Cablegate' release, what does it means to be a 'journalist'?


One year ago, WikiLeaks published a treasure trove of over 250,000 leaked cables from U.S. embassies abroad.

As copycat platforms sprung up in Europe and beyond, Julian Assange became the ranting main character in a media tabloid sitcom.

But how, if at all, did the availability of raw, confidential data change the face of journalism?

(Source: Flickr)

The call for the spread of visibility became an intense debate across media platforms. This visibility may itself be on the rise, considering the recent attacks on students at UC Davis or the arrest of a British woman after racial attacks on the London Tube.

Arguably, 'reporting' on the ground by citizen journalists is on the increase through the spread of social media, but it has not had the forceful impact that releasing confidential cables achieved globally.

Criminal violations or not, WikiLeaks became an invaluable resource for that next breaking piece of news. Or did it?

WikiLeaks may have been the catalyst to change our perspectives on the ways in which we can gain information, and in turn act upon it. WikiLeaks was not the change itself in content distribution, but it did signify a broad shift of power in digital technology.

Before 'Cablegate', nobody really seemed to take much notice.

As global networks became greater and more data was recorded online, more sources were bound to emerge: authorised or unauthorised. WikiLeaks took advantage of a gap in state surveillance, with governmental bodies unable to truly control or understand the flow of information seeping across digital networks.

The rules -- ideally -- can be viewed as basic within journalism, by having substantial information and verified sources. However, WikiLeaks sources containing raw data often decoupled information from its context.

Attempting to process such a vast amount of raw data and crunching numbers can be a discouraging prospect unless you have the time to sift through to find your story. This is not necessarily something that journalists in the majority collective are equipped to deal with.

Just because information is available online doesn't mean people will spend the time cracking secrets or interpreting information. Chasing the secret may be the thrill involved in many aspects of journalism; but is this to the detriment of local reporters on the ground that may have a better view of what is actually going on?

Governmental bodies began to react by inducing a greater level of censorship, and stepping up their online surveillance to try and control the flow of information. Paradoxically, a greater wealth of information online available to journalists to penetrate may in fact be the pull that tightens the noose.

Perhaps this is a temporary free information flow, and we can already see the reaction of governmental and entertainment industries, who don't like to be undermined.

SOPA appears, domain names are seized, and judges attempt to order de-indexing of sites. These may be the first major publicised signs that the biggest players are trying to grasp control of how we are really networked.

The media operates within a network of leaked information, and WikiLeaks may have been more than a disruption of traditional, on the ground journalistic practice. It has been a catalyst that is beginning to alter what it means to be a journalist.

British universities, for example, are expanding their offerings by beginning to offer courses in interactive journalism in an attempt catch up.

Mainstream journalists are not all necessarily aware of the potential of online networks. Data journalism is more expensive and time consuming than traditional forms, and there is no reason that every journalist must now learn how to be a programmer or spend sleepless nights crunching numbers and verifying sources.

But journalism in itself has to learn a new set of skills in order to keep up with the changing face of content distribution.

If the next generation of journalists do not understand network theory, social platforms or cyber-security, this may inhibit their ability to spot connections and report effectively in a rapidly digitised world.


Topics: Social Enterprise, Networking

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Just like they teach it in school

    Look what's happening right here on ZDNet with the "CarrierIQ" brouhaha. In the space of a few hours we went from never having heard of it, to a dozen stories claiming that hundreds of millions of phones were infected with tracking spyware, to a few people saying "Hold on a minute here, are we really sure anyone was spied on?" to some actual facts that seem to indicate that the original stories were pure bunk, to some revisionist history saying that even though the original stories were bunk, they might come true someday so we should all be scared anyway.

    Was any of that "journalism"? I hope not.
    Robert Hahn
    • RE: Cablegate: One year on, the changing face of journalism

      @Robert Hahn

      Actually, I would disagree. The majority of the coverage by various android developers, software engineers, or even the guy that cracked the story in the first place were all pretty level. MAINSTREAM media blew things up with overblown headlines. It's not a question of whether implementing CIQ crossed the line. The assessment now is whether the company exceeded their mandate from the carriers or if the carriers are entirely to blame. The fact is, it's the mainstream media that's been blowing up the wire even though they still haven't even figured out what question to ask. It's the bloggers that at least figured out that a question needs to be asked.
      • Quick, say something. We have to beat The Other Site.

        I think we are all in violent agreement with the author, figuring that the mix of highly technical subject matter, journalists who don't know C# from Shinola, and lightning-fast deadlines can only lead to trouble.
        Robert Hahn
  • RE: Cablegate: One year on, the changing face of journalism

    If the next generation of journalists do not understand network theory, social platforms or cyber-security, this may inhibit their ability to spot connections and report effectively in a rapidly digitised world.<br><br>Journalists didn't report effectively before wikileaks and they don't report effectively now.<br><br>The reason has nothing to do with knowledge of network theory. The reason is because they refuse to ask the tough questions. They ignore the elephant in the room. At the national level, they love their income. Their kids go to the same private schools as the kids of the officials they cover.<br><br>If they annoy, they will be denied access and lose their jobs.<br><br>All they are willing to report is what officials say. When you read, watch or listen to national news, you hear outright lies treated like another point of view.<br><br>One thing wikileaks has shown us is the willingness and ability of the financial sector to kill an organization by refusing to conduct transactions on its behalf. Name a credit card company. It will not process donations to wikileaks.

    You would think this would lead to a lively discussion in the media about how the traditional role of the financial sector is to grease the wheel of the larger economy, and now they are a choke point and are willing to use it, and should society be concerned? But no. Instead, crickets.<br><br>Judge Rakoff recently killed an agreement between SEC and citigroup, saying it's bad for the public. This wrist-slapping, non-accountablility and recidivism has been going on for years. No journalist knew it? No journalist thought it was newsworthy? Thanks to Judge Rakoff for bringing our attention to it, and now the journalists are all over it like flies.

    none none
  • dough rounder

    Hey there I am so happy I found your web site, I really found you by accident, while I was looking on Google for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say kudos for a incredible post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I dont have time to read it all at the moment but I have bookmarked it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read much more, Please do keep up the superb job.<br>Appreciating the time and energy you put into your site and in depth information you present. It's awesome to come across a blog every once in a while that isn't the same old rehashed material. Wonderful read! I've bookmarked your site and I'm including your RSS feeds to my Google account.<br>Hi! I've been following your blog for a long time now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from Atascocita Texas! know more information please contact me (Michael Ling ) <a href="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a>
    dough rounder