China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
Summary: A group of Chinese writers have placed Apple in the firing line for illegal sale of their work through the Apple App store.
A Beijing court has accepted a case filed by nine renowned Chinese authors against Apple Inc.
In a case worth a projected 11.91 million yuan (US$1.88 million), Apple are on the firing line for selling the writers' works illegally within its App store. The technology giant is being taken to court by famous writers including Han Han, Li Chengpeng, and Murong Xuecun, furious at their work being pirated and sold by the corporation.
The company is accused of having failed to block the sale of unauthorised ebook applications, and profiting from it.
(Source: Fergus Randall/Flickr)
Speaking to the Shanghai Morning post, Bei Zhicheng, an official from the writer's protection alliance, said it was "total theft." The official believes that Apple is the only well-known corporation online that is profiteering from illegal book sales, with the usual 30% cut Apple receives from app developers.
It is reported that some of the works have been downloaded several million times via the App store, potentially costing the authors millions of dollars. One of writers has accused Apple of "stealing money from our pockets".
In August 2011, the writer Zhu Jintai became the first Chinese individual to file a lawsuit against Apple when he sued the company for the infringement of intellectual property rights. The author was partly successful in his complaint, and Apple removed the novel from its digital bookshelf.
Following this, Apple issued a statement concerning its App developer terms of service -- reiterating that they are not permitted to violate, misappropriate or infringe copyright. The lawsuit for compensation is currently pending.
In October 2011, six writers demanded 6.5 million yuan (US$1.03 million) in compensation from Apple over the copyright infringement of 23 individual book titles, accusing the Apple App Store of profiting by allowing apps to be sold containing the work without permission from the copyright owners.
The Chinese writer's alliance, who have represented many of the copyright holders, have urged Apple to consider Chinese law in their online sales. They request that copyright certification becomes standard when books are being sold by the App store. According to Bei, Apple has so far refused.
The group, in conjunction with other writers, have also previously waged campaigns against Baidu and Google, causing Baidu to delete 2.8 million unauthorized works, and Google to issue a formal apology in 2010.
Related:
- Mystery Apple event to focus on education, iTunes U, digital publishing?
- Apple's internal employee social media policies leaked
- Stanford University guards its Apple treasure trove
- China jumps on the Western online-course bandwagon
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
only when it's their ideas that are taken. Not when it's reversed.
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
US has done whatever it wanted during last 50 years (relying on its military). Now it's China's turn to do whatever it wants.
They will care about intellectual property whenever it is about their companies. Because they can ... !!!
An odd statement.
are you aluding that China would use it's military against Apple?
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
I took his comments to mean military power would be used against the great imperialistic western powers as a means to enforce Chinese foreign nationalistic policy.
Actual, if that interpretation is correct, our friend has spent his higher educational dollars in a most unwise manner.
You do realize that more than 1 person lives in China
Apple doesn't care about intellectual property rights as evident by numerous court cases they've recently lost involving their theft of others' IP. Does that mean that the entire US doesn't care about IP rights?
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
I'm waiting to see what else Apple flat out steals from someone next and gets away with it. Just seem's awefull funny to me that Apple can just take what they want from people. I just want to say apple compensated greg hughes in no way (except block his app and take his idea) after stealing his stuff, which is now in IOS5. Mind you, years after the app was first available, which you can still get from cydia.
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
Yes Apple stole from everyone and benefitted immensely from others' invention.
I wonder where did goog get the touch idea from to use for android.
Greg Hughes must had benefitted immensely from android now or his idea was ripped off by android to the tune that he got nothing for his effort. Poor guy.
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
The WiFi Sync thing was IMHO simply inexcusable on Apple's part.
Do you really suprised by Apple?
It's Technology meeting Liberal Art street.
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
No problem ...
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
Sadly, it will also mean that Amazon, Best Buy and Fry's ...
I see a your point .... it could be fun to watch in court.
RE: China next in line to sue Apple, illegal App store sales
Apple is an accomplice
Apple profited directly, not indirectly, from the sale of this material. Presumably the authors could go after both the developers and Apple. Going after Apple for the 30% does not stop them from going after the developers for 70%
"they are interested in getting recognition and money"
Apple is the richest company in the entire world because they are only interested in money. When did this become a bad thing?