'Fastest broadband in EU' in election promise; Open source debated

By | March 15, 2010, 4:15pm PDT

Summary: UK Elections 2010: 2Mbps broadband nationwide now, or 100mbps nationwide seven years later; and will governments go open-source?

The run up to the UK general election is spattered with political hot potatoes, debates and changes afoot, with a bust economy and a range of issues which are drowning the political sphere with up to the minute issues. As with the 2009 US elections, the technology field has been widely debated and is set to be a major swaying issue between the main political parties.

The current opposition, the Conservative Party, is pledging to enable Britain to become the fastest broadband country in Europe if they win the election, attempting to make available 100Mbps to most residences by 2017. They also, according to the BBC, in line with launching their digital and technology manifesto elements, want to create a “next generation of firms like Google and Microsoft”.

Basic background information
The UK has two main political parties (and a third, which represents a small but significant minority) as does the US, Labour and the Conservatives, which in some way can be compared to the Democrats and the Republicans loosely, respectively, as per their political persuasions. The elections will be held at some point before June 2010, and though the date has not been announced, many expect it to fall in line with previous election dates in or around the 5th/6th May 2010.

The current Labour government created the Digital Britain report which laid out detailed plans to roll out 2Mbps broadband to every house in the UK by 2010, which is currently on track. The report also delved into anti-piracy methods which would potentially cut off pirates and illegal file sharers and peer-to-peer users should they become repeat offenders, which even some government departments including MI5 opposed. The broadband roll out have been paid for by a 50p ($0.75) tax on every landline household bill per month to generate around £200 million ($300 million) a year towards the program.

This is a similar project to the US National Broadband Plan which pledges to ensure that all US citizens have the ability to access high-speed broadband. Tomorrow, the FCC will unveil a national broadband strategy which will promote national infrastructure needs through education, jobs, health, energy and security, “laying the groundwork for investing in America’s future”.

It is fair to say that the next-generation technologies, even though the vast majority of consumers have been engaged with them for years already, will be rolled out as part of Government 2.0 on both sides of the pond.

However, the Conservatives policy on wider access broadband to rural areas could see their major voting constituencies missing out on the fast Internet access. Though the Conservatives will scrap the 50p tax on landlines per month, which was implemented to fund countryside broadband, the major areas of Conservative voting power could suffer most from the decision to hold back on subsidising rural super-fast broadband.

There is little mention of open-source technology in the Conservative manifesto, whereas the present Labour government seems relatively keen to promote the idea. This, proven almost, by the release of a large amount of raw data by the government onto the web, spurred on by World Wide Web creator, Sir Tim Berners-Lee.

According to the Telegraph, it was down to current Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who put forward the honour of bestowing a knighthood upon former Microsoft chairman, Bill Gates.

So in a nutshell, Labour will continue to support Digital Britain in nationwide broadband access, while the Conservatives will scrap the 50p tax demolishing Labour’s plan, but instead hold off a few more years to enable everyone across the country access to fibre-optic connections.

But with open-source being somewhat embraced by the government in schools, perhaps the Conservatives would be better off trying to firm up some plans to enable open access to free, open-source software within their potential future government.

Poll

What would be more important to you as a citizen:

Or just leave a comment and have your say. This could turn into a healthy and exciting political conversation (yay!)

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
46
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

If you let a corporation run the country, you get a fascit police state..
AzuMao 16th Apr 2010
..that only cares about lining its own coffers, regardless of how much this makes it suck for the citizens.

China is a good example of this.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm Canadian, and I'd like ...
mheartwood Updated - 15th Mar 2010
an open source government.

I provide my own high speed internet access.

But our current government is as opaque as it gets, so getting a more open and transparent government would be a much higher priority right now.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm an American...
aep528 16th Mar 2010
Who doesn't believe broadband is a "right" and would
prefer the government drop the broadband plan and taxes
entirely. I do not believe there is a need to build out
infrastructure in areas with only one or two potential
customers. People CHOSE to live there - let them face the
consequences. Stop charging the rest of us for their
decision.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: I'm an American...
step69 17th Mar 2010
I believe everybody should have broadband access regardless where they live. Aep528 wrote,
"I do not believe there is a need to build out
infrastructure in areas with only one or two potential customers. People CHOSE to live there - let them face the consequences. Stop charging the rest of us for their decision." Who says there are "only one or two potential customers" in any area in the US? Our population is always growing not decreasing. To pay taxes for this now will be much cheaper than doing a mad scramble later when these areas far exceed aep528's projection of "only one or two potential customers". This is going to happen regardless of what some may think now. To do it now before a population explosion makes more sense than being overwelmed and having to scramble to install infrastructure from scratch after.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm a US citizen...
lefty.crupps 17th Mar 2010
"American" covers people from two continents, Zack Whittaker.

Anyways, as our population grows, people either live in cities where jobs are, or they live in rural areas where there are already more than two customers. So, there are plenty of spaces that don't need boradband if there really are two customers only.

In the near future, wireless broadband will skip the landline broadband imstallations, if we can get the current players to move in that direction. Cable and Phone companies, however, I doubt will do this, so hopefully some competition will come from someone else (please, not more Google. I like them, but enough already).
0 Votes
+ -
Re: I'm an American
wizard57m@... 17th Mar 2010
quote "Who doesn't believe broadband is a "right" and would
prefer the government drop the broadband plan and taxes
entirely. I do not believe there is a need to build out
infrastructure in areas with only one or two potential
customers. People CHOSE to live there - let them face the
consequences. Stop charging the rest of us for their
decision."

Hey, idiot...I've lived in "rural" areas a large percentage of my lifetime, SO, to you and others with this attitude, I say this...
Since most cables, pipelines, powerlines and other utility transferances traverse our rural areas, we'll no longer allow this trespass of our land, you can dig in your own backyard, but not my "back 40"! How many of the urban centers would still have "basic services" if it weren't for all the easments granted by "rural" landowners? I'll give you a hint...
not very damn many!
0 Votes
+ -
What kind?
AzuMao 17th Mar 2010
Central American? Like, Mexico?

South American? Like, Venezuela?

North American? Like, Canada?

Please be more specific!
0 Votes
+ -
Central America?
perrys8419@... 18th Mar 2010
Hey ididot, Mexico is in NORTH America!
0 Votes
+ -
As a Canadian, I too supply my own high speed internet access. I live in a city, and put up with the traffic, lack of open spaces, etc. If I lived in the country, I'd have the advantages of living in the country, but one of the disadvantages would be lack of affordable high speed internet access. Life is about choices people, so enough with the "they have it, so the gov. gotta give it to me" attitude. It's time the western world grew up, for gawds sake!
0 Votes
+ -
I an American....
ibeapunker 17th Mar 2010
.....and believe the government can stay the hell out of my internet!
0 Votes
+ -
I an American!!!!!!
JamesNelson 17th Mar 2010
You obviously returned the compliment by staying out of their schools
0 Votes
+ -
If the Grvernment wasn't in it
dfinn@... 17th Mar 2010
The internet would not exist in this country. but
we would be trying to catch up to the rest of the
world.

don;t forget about DARPA
As with the recent announcememt of the same aspirational 100Mbos in the USA, this is all a load of absolute bollocks.

100Mbbps will *only* happen where fibre/cable either exists, or can be delivered at low economic cost.

People who live in rural or low density area's, where it would cast tens of ?bn's to deliver, just won't get it. There as dozen's of better things to spend the money on.

The issue is worse in the USA, due to the vastly larger land mass. Wireless is also challenging, as in many places you barely get cell service, never mind 3G or WIMAX.

Polotician 'hollow promises'.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm British...
isildore 17th Mar 2010
And I think the Government (whether Tory or Labour) should focus on sorting out our knackered economy and leave the 'Digital Britain' bill for now. I live in a typical mid-size town in a rural county and I have access to either up to 20Mbps ADSL or 50Mbps DSL connection.

As a civil servant myself, I would welcome a move to open source. However, before we attempt such a sea change in IT, our existing IT teams should be trained in delivering what their paid to do!
0 Votes
+ -
In Britain the problems of universal broadband are much
less than in US as there is less distance between towns
and the most distant parts of the countryside. In
Scotland there are a few people it would be difficult to
serve. As the government has ideas of organising access
to government services on line it is keen to have
broadband for everyone. On the other hand having been an
engineer in government service I think the government is
so incompetent at anything technical that it is unlikely
they will ever get it properly organised.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm British and live in Scotland.
jakelly404@... 17th Mar 2010
I live in a remotish part of Scotland and don't have anything like 2Mbs broadband. I'm paying for 4Mbs! We were supposed to get high speed broadband but so far it's been limited to the cities. I pay the same taxes and phone bills as everyone else so why can't I have it as well?

I can understand that population centres are going to be easier to cable/fibre optic but there should be a planned rollout for the whole country. I must agree that governments in the UK no matter what thier political hue are absolutely useless at anything technical. If we're lucky we might just get the "Amstrad" version of broadband!
100mbs would be great, but why not charge each user an extra .50 pence so anyone can download anything, this extra charge to be divided between the music industry and th film industry. I am sure that would suffice the loss they claim at present for supposedly illegal downloading!!
..which is much more profitable.
0 Votes
+ -
I'm an American...
guleblanc 17th Mar 2010
I'm an American. Most Americans who say the government should stay out of their lives are trying to commit some crime, which the government wants to stop them from committing. I really want an honest government, which is about the business of solving problems which markets can't seem to solve. Providing health care is one, and providing broadband is another. However, what we get is conservative government, which about the business of shuffling graft to large corporations. The only way to keep this from happening is to let people know what the government does, which is why I voted for open source government.
Also, which country are you from? Cuba? Barbados? Venezuela? Mexico? Please clarify! There are so many in America!
Focus on my typo and not my statement. Nice.
I'm British and I've witnessed UK governments waste ? billions on grandiose IT systems, which have variously been cancelled, delayed, gone hopelessly over-budget, and/or failed to perform to spec. These promises should be accorded the same respect as their earlier pronouncements and promises.
I'm british and live in Rural Wales. The 2 Mb/sec speed promised by the Government is certainly not on track for rural areas. I have a connection of less than 1 Mb/sec, and many others only 0.25. British Telecom has a total monopoly over the infrastructure in most areas of the UK (other than the cities), and has no plans to improve rural speeds. BT needs moore competition. The alternative to optic fibre would be via a 4G mobile network, but we don't even have 3G over most of Wales. 100 Mbps is a pipe dream. I would be happy with the "up to" 20 Mbps I pay to BT.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Oooh I love Wales
zwhittaker 17th Mar 2010
Not really the Rhonder that much (no offence) but it's a beautiful part of the island. It's just a shame Nick Griffin lives there.
if the government wasn't in the internet there would not
be an Internet

Think about it
0 Votes
+ -
Meanwhile, over on the continent...
putt1ck 17th Mar 2010
They already got open source governments *and* fast broadband. Sometimes high taxes are well spent ...
0 Votes
+ -
It's interesting to note....
Beejaybee 17th Mar 2010
It's interesting to note how many are of the opinion that government should stay clear of any digital infrastructure and leave it to 'the market'.
I would guess they are the 'mental descendants' to the ones that fought government involvement in every other issue that is most costeffective solved by society as a common task like roads, defence, mail, law and order, health care and social services, waste disposal, water supplies, the list goes on and on.....
Somehow they seem to forget that having a well functioning infrastructure is of incalculable benefit to all and furthermore is actually a prerequisite of obtaining what most of us would deem to be an acceptable level of comfort and safety, not to mention standard of living.
As to who should actually deliver the technicalities involved in these fields is another matter entirely as long as it is society as a whole that gets to decide standards and distribution of costs.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: It's interesting to note....
isildore 17th Mar 2010
That is a sweeping statement. And as such, wholly inaccurate!

I am a realist - Government, especially the UK Government are typically inept at anything and everything (look at the debacle that is our economy!) but I am a staunch supporter of the NHS.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
The NHS is awesome
zwhittaker 17th Mar 2010
nt. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Right or left, they get it wrong
mheartwood 17th Mar 2010
Over the past decade, the government of Canada has tried to bring high speed interent to rural areas of the country. And every program has not only failled, but been a massive waste of money.

If the government endorses some particular technology to give everyone 128kbps, it's obsolete by the time the plan passes parliment. Moore's law means that change occurs faster than the government can keep up. This results in repeated failure.

Therefore, as long as the government can't get it right, they should stay out of it.
0 Votes
+ -
My point is that
Beejaybee 18th Mar 2010
societies basic infrastructure is something that society needs to have control over, not something it can be held hostage over by some enterprising subgroup.
The more developed a society the more complex and advanced is it's basic infrastructure needs.


What I am NOT saying is that managing infrastructures (not to mention other things) can't be made a lot more effective and cheaply than seems to be the case in most of our countries. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Politicians promises?
rhon@... 17th Mar 2010
Great Britain: Old infrastructure, political infighting, huge
debts.... It is highly unlikely that the UK will ever be able to
compete with the Nordic countries and Northern European
countries where the government invest heavily in optic
networks. It is known that the better regulated markets have
an average speeds that is 4 times higher than in less
regulated countries like the US and the UK.
If the British government has anything to do with an IT project then it will either be the most expensive in the world or the whole scheme will be cancelled after wasting the odd few billions.

Can anyone name one successful government project, on time, within budget and performs to spec.?

I can get pigs flying in my broadband:-) (750kbps)
I am witting for the Promised speed from google in LA for high speed to hit Phoenix yet More promises from More jerks
I'm British and pay for 10Mbps - I get about 2Mbps. The 50p levy is
being spent on upgrading telephone exchanges and lines since these are
universal. In the UK there is always a class divide, in Broadband the
divide is between areas with cable providers and those without. British
Telecom (BT) provide our universal telephone lines and all ISPs using the
telephone wires are limited by the BT service. As BT is itself an ISP there
is some constraint to the competitive delivery of non-cable services.
The Labour Government commitment to 10Mbps is probably ten years away
for rural, and Scots, users. Nevertheless this is the right way to go. The
Conservatives rely heavily on bland promises with little detail about how
to deliver and how to pay - they are desperate to get elected and not
committed to any kind of universal services.
They can do it in two years if they wanted to: add in a charge a pound a month for every cell phone!

The only way to put out broadband to rural areas is the charge the urban people extra to pay for the rural areas - always has been that way and always will be that way. Private companies will not do it due to basic construction and maintenance cost reasons. Reason why governments step in and impose extra fees on people who will not directly benefit to pay for the people who will. Lots of programs over the past 100 years were put in place just to do that - Rural electrification program, the Telephone tax to subsidze rural phone companies, RFD - Rural Free Delivery ie: post office and others. Urban people have to pay the price for people growing the food in the rural areas. Not always fair, but then often Government programs are not meant to be fair but to achieve a social or political goal.
I ever told myself, that being a Chilean, I'm an American too. Why can't people from de USA call themself citizen of the USA? The term American should be reserved to describe a continental reference.
0 Votes
+ -
American.... pfft
andmark 17th Mar 2010
America is 2 continents, not one country, Zack. Your audience is more than just USA and UK and you should know better to reflect and respect that.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
I apologise
zwhittaker 17th Mar 2010
Sincerely. When I talk about America, I mean the United States. When I say American's, I mean citizens of the United States. However, (I don't think I ever have but) when I do refer to the southern Americas, I will refer to it as "South America". Though, because there are many different and diverse countries, cultures, socio-economic statuses etc., I'll probably refer to each individual country I mention, whereas the United States is relatively balanced all over in comparison.
..America in general?

Like, all the people in Africa, can be called Africans.

But you want to use "Americans" to refer people from just one country.. so how do you refer to people from America?
0 Votes
+ -
Morre's Law for 2017. Go for Open Source now.
mheartwood Updated - 17th Mar 2010
If the 2Mbps broadband plan is on track, then everyone will have 10Mbps by 2017 anyway. That's just Moore's law.
0 Votes
+ -
broadband
trm1945 18th Mar 2010
Let's privatize government. Let a corporation run the country.
The only thing present governments have going for them is
they get replaced on a regular basis with a bunch of clones.
Want to be a Doctor? Go to School. Want to be a Lawyer? Go
to school. Want to run a country? Get elected. Want to
implement broadband? Pass a bill. Want to be noticed? Pass
gas.
..that only cares about lining its own coffers, regardless of how much this makes it suck for the citizens.

China is a good example of this.
I recently moved to Scotland from Cheshire where I enjoyed 8meg down and 550k upstream connection and it was great. After much messing around with BT who are a total mess at getting anything done I now have about 1meg downstream connection most days on a line that can accomodate upto 4meg (I'm about 5 miles from Dundee where you can easily get 20meg). I find that a 3G dongle gives me a faster connection than BT can. The infrastructure is too old, the local phone exchanges are not updated enough so how the hell the Government think they can get us upto 100 megs in 4 years is just not going to happen, period. You are right that BT needs much much more competition; their service sucks, the pricing sucks and their connections for those not in cities also suck. But we have no reasonable alternatives, either. And I don't think a broadband tax should be introduced; I pay for what I use and I don't think other people should pay for my services and I shouldn't pay for other people's. That said, if a tax would definately get me a faster connection then I would be happy to contribute to it, but I would not think it reasonable that non net connected homes should have to pay for something. BT as the infrastructure owners should pay for it; they got the UK into this mess in the first place.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix