Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
Summary: Nearly ten-thousand original iPads were donated by upgrading customers, to give to economically deprived schools a chance to own one for their classrooms.
A project has seen nearly ten thousand first-generation iPads offered to teachers -- who are members of the Teach for America corps -- after Apple asked customers upgrading to the iPad 2 to donate their original tablet.
Many who decided to upgrade to the new iPad either sold their first-generation tablet or traded it in to offset the cost, while others found that Apple's offering for teachers around the United States was a better option.
Teach for America is a corps of teachers recently out of college, who commit to working in deprived and less-economically viable places. Former Apple chief executive Steve Jobs' wife, Laurene Powell, sits on the board.
While the aim was to enable every student in the scheme, which runs in over thirty states, the Apple branded tablet is still a great help to teachers -- and students alike -- in the classroom.
Though so many high-profile and wealthy schools can afford to give an iPad to every student, the scheme falls short. But to enable as many classrooms as possible, even if it is just one device per room, to make the interactive experience of teaching and learning better, it is certainly a push in the right direction.
It may sound fickle, but technology is something that resonates with the younger Generation Y and Z nowadays; two generations only 'sibling-aged' apart which has been brought up on connectivity and interactive content. Simply having one in the classroom can be an incentive to children in particular to finish their work as quickly and as accurately as possible.
But the iPad alone, or any other tablet for that matter, cannot solve the problem of lack of reading. Technology can inspire and go on to motivate. But kids aren't stupid. They cannot be coaxed into reading with a flashy Kindle, or begin to enjoy solving equations because they are done on a tablet-run application.
Technology is often the key to modern education and engaging children. But the innate problems with education as a sector cannot be solved by a tablet.
Related:
- Schools ditch books for iPads; Won't solve today's reading 'crisis'
- iPad not so popular on campus; iPhone more practical?
- iPad: Breeding ground for the next-gen developer
- Five things the iPad 2 needs for Generation Y approval
- Open letter: University iPad ban; Catch up, simple as
- The truth about iPad: It's only good for two things
- iPad in schools? Content controls, DRM, and pricing mean no
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
Just the other day I read about a trial program at a university where the iPad was shown to improve results and lower textbook costs.
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
I also read the other day that iPad helps fermentation of beer and makes wine taste better.
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
Was this at apple university? And was the "improve results" their ability to get hit by a car for not paying attention. And the lower textbook costs because they used the ipad to get to amazon to buy used text books?
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
A study conducted by apple for apple. Thes are media devices and don't belong in the class. I'd much rather have my kids writing and reading from a book and not a device. Apple isn't even enterprise caliber and it never will be. I'd rather see kids using productive tools...not toys!
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
Yep I can remember Apple IIs gathering dust in classrooms.
I've said it before:
Combination boat anchor and fish lure.
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
A. immediately download some games and play it all day. huh read what? you can read books on this thing. yeah ok maybe later. one more level of angry birds
B. leave it in the cafeteria along with his jacket and left shoe and remember he left it 3 days later when he decides to play some angry birds.
c. walking home from school, the ipad gets ripped out of his hands but older kids and/or get run over by a car because he was playing angry birds.
Please stop with your insights. They are too sad to read
Suffice it to say, your examples illustrate a reality that I am not familiar with. (Although I have known "a" case where a homicide was committed against an 11 year old child because a gang of children his age wished to have his new Christmas present jacket. True tragic story.)
Again, if the actions portrayed in your post were drawn from personal experience, please accept my heartfelt sympathy for you and the neighborhood you dwell in. It must be filled with delinquents and children destined to become failures in society.
RE: Finding a use for all those first-generation iPads
Meanwhile - back on topic...
Im not an Apple fan, I use a Macbook and iPhone for work and am still trying to like them. Nevertheless, I can still acknowledge the altruistic intention of this program.
I attended an iPad2 demonstration at a Melbourne private school recently which showcased the amazing program content that is becoming available on the tablets including teaching programs for students with physical and mental disability.
I came away with a new-found respect for the platform in an educational context, despite the cynicism that I held at the start. It is not the product that is the focus here, rather it is how we can get the most out of using it - whatever its limitations.
Meanwhile, back on topic
Im not an Apple fan, I use a Macbook and iPhone for work and am still trying to like them. Nevertheless, I can still acknowledge the altruistic intention of this program.
I attended an iPad2 demonstration at a Melbourne private school recently which showcased the amazing program content that is becoming available on the tablets including teaching programs for students with physical and mental disability.
I came away with a new-found respect for the platform in an educational context, despite the cynicism that I held at the start. It is not the product that is the focus here, rather it is how we can get the most out of using it - whatever its limitations.
apple profit machine
So what did they do here? The got other people to donate their old ipads. Big whoop. Maybe if they made the ipads truly affordable I would applaud. But here ,apple, the 2nd wealthiest company in the world, got other people to donate their ipads they could have sold to defray the cost of their new iPad to give it to charity. Those screen wipes they used to clean the ipads must have put a huge dent in Steve's retirement fund.
apple is one of the stingiest company's around. Maybe if they matched the donated ipads I would be really impresses. What did this gimmick cost them? Not much. Apple, rotten to the core.
apple profit machine
I agree with you to a big extent where the stinginess of Apple gets mentioned.
My thought:
I don't really know much about the details of the project and Apple's involvement, but as far as I understand from the blog, it <b>appears</b> that Apple is the one actually credited as the honorable (a simple anotation where Steve Job's wife gets mentioned) simply because they (indirectly)asked their customers to donate their own paid for but (now) redundant ipads. If his wife is so grand, humble, etc. why doesn't she persuade Apple / Steve Jobs to create a program to trade-in the old units for that same group of customers and use that amount towards a new ipad2 purchase for them? Naturally, the trade-ins should only apply to this particular program and / or people. As a result, Apple may then donate the traded-in ipdas to the program themselves and deservingly collect all the credit and the laurels for the gesture. Other than that, why do the customers (while Apple mostly receives the praise) have to do it on behalf of Apple?
Not much I suppose, but my understanding nevertheless.