Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
Summary: Has it really been a rough year for the BlackBerry manufacturer? Considering it's only May, it hasn't been too bad. But it's time to re-adjust the focus.
"Wait until 2012", says Nokia and Research in Motion, the BlackBerry manufacturer, according to Larry Dignan.
There is no doubt that the BlackBerry PlayBook has had a rough start to begin with. But, with 45,000 devices sold on the first day, it is certainly not the worst start an up-and-coming device has had. Compared to the iPad, however, sales will look poor.
So, stop comparing it to the iPad?
I strongly suspect that, while this has been dubbed an 'iPad competitor', it has been pedastaled as something far greater than it actually is.
It's a tablet, just as every other tablet on the market is. However, the iPad is in a league of its own, and probably always will be. Why try and fight to beat something when you know it probably isn't going to happen?
The problem with the PlayBook is that it doesn't have a niche, yet. Though the BlackBerry brand was built on smartphone sales and the premise of secure communications, the PlayBook will not detract away from the main selling points of the smartphone market.
But ordinary consumers, especially the younger lot, will want Research in Motion to focus on the smartphone. Their eyes are blinded by the iPad and will see no other tablet as a viable competitor.
In fact, the vast majority of those who I have spoken to of my own demographic, didn't know what the BlackBerry PlayBook was, but were intrigued for it to own the BlackBerry name -- and wanted to know more.
While the enterprise environment appears to be excited by the PlayBook's arrival, it has not been pitched at the consumer market. Unfortunately for RIM, the PlayBook only works 'one way': the PlayBook will not automatically become a hit because of the BlackBerry name, but arguably the lack of sales compared to the iPad will not deter the ordinary consumers away from existing and future BlackBerry smartphones.
Research in Motion do, however, need to re-focus their efforts back into the crucial elements of the consumer view. There's no doubt that the BlackBerry device is still as popular as they have been over the last year, with practically one in every five people seemingly owning one.
2011 may not have been the year that Research in Motion wanted to remember. One could argue, it was "the year the PlayBook revolutionised the enterprise", regardless of the projected fewer numbers they expected. On the other hand, it could be seen as the "year the PlayBook flopped into oblivion".
Ultimately, it's down to perception. And analysts, columnists, and journalists degrading and slating the PlayBook on the popular media bandwagon is not what the consumers take away from it all. Consumers don't like change -- so if it isn't broken, don't change.
Or -- do change, but do it carefully. The PlayBook was rolled out tactfully, but not carefully; which is why it probably missed its mark.
Related posts:
- Nokia, RIM: Sidekicks walking through the valley of the shadow of death
- Is the BlackBerry PlayBook competitive enough?
- Can the BlackBerry PlayBook appeal to non-BB owners?
- Hands-on video walkthrough of the RIM BlackBerry PlayBookBlackBerry PlayBook: Mixed bag of reviews, but enough to defend the enterprise
- RIM’s Android compatibility for BlackBerry PlayBook and QNX will be a big game of chase
- BlackBerry PlayBook gets real today; AT&T blocking updates already
- All BlackBerry PlayBook coverage
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
Thankyou for your responses.
Second question, if I understand the situation correctly, the Playbook does not do email natively; rather, it operates through a BB phone. So, if that is the case, is it possible to access email through a Playbook tethered to a non-BB phone? Are there any other limitations if the PB is tethered to a non-BB phone?
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
Remind me. When the original iPad
was announced (Not yet released) what then did you "see" for it's future?
Pagan jim
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
The PlayBook is not a do-or-die device. And RIM's situation is not as dire as the pundits like to portray. The smartphone market is still growing and the tablet market hasn't even begun to be defined. RIM continues to grow and are making a change to position themselves for the future.
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
When you owned 90% of the smartphone market and you fall to 20%, that is very close to a "dire situation". The trend for RIM is pointing down...
RE: Is the PlayBook just 'a blip' in the BlackBerry radar?
It's economics 101, but when you create a market the only way for market share to go is down. Apple used to have 90% of the touchscreen smartphone market, now it's ~30%, but they're still making buckets of cash. RIM's building a global brand, and is growing revenue 50%+ / year, hardly 'dire'.
45,000 sold number is from RBC which is a RIM partner
RBC a canadian bank is a Rim business partner:
"May 12 2008:
"today announced plans to launch the BlackBerry(R)
Partners Fund, a US$150 million venture capital fund, to invest in mobile
applications and services for the BlackBerry(R) platform and other mobile
platforms. The Fund is to be co-managed by JLA Ventures and RBC Venture
Partners."
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2008/12/c7116.html"
People can decide how much you want to trust that info.