iTunes Match: Legitimising your illegal music collection?

By | June 6, 2011, 12:21pm PDT

Summary: Apple’s new cloud-based iTunes service will allow pirate music downloaders to legitimise their playlists for an incredibly low price of $25 a year.

Just announced at Apple’s WWDC conference: iTunes Match.

Apple’s website has just been updated with the latest goings on from the keynote speech, including Steve Jobs himself.

iTunes Match will allow you to keep all the songs that you have in your music library — even the ones that have been downloaded illegally. Lower quality music will be matched to iTunes’ library and upgraded to a higher quality 256kbps AAC DRM-free file, so it can be ported onto any device.

And all of this only costs $24.99 a year.

I’ll grant Apple this — just under $25 a year to legitimise an entire music collection is not a bad deal whatsoever.

From Apple’s website:

“If you want all the benefits of iTunes in the Cloud for music you haven’t purchased from iTunes, iTunes Match is the perfect solution. It lets you store your entire collection, including music you’ve ripped from CDs or purchased somewhere other than iTunes. For just $24.99 a year.

Here’s how it works: iTunes determines which songs in your collection are available in the iTunes Store. Any music with a match is automatically added to your iCloud library for you to listen to anytime, on any device.

Since there are more than 18 million songs in the iTunes Store, most of your music is probably already in iCloud. All you have to upload is what iTunes can’t match. Which is much faster than starting from scratch. And all the music iTunes matches plays back at 256-Kbps iTunes Plus quality — even if your original copy was of lower quality.”

So, not only will Apple allow you to store vast quantities of music in the cloud, it will even replace the poor quality music you have if Apple has it in the iTunes library.

It is limited to 25,000 songs, however, and will require an iOS 5 device. But many will have far less than that. There are limits to every service, of course.

Whether iTunes Match will be a conduit for the music police to come knocking at the door, I heavily doubt. I do suspect that these clandestine deals with major record labels in the past few weeks will help repair the tarnished relationship between record companies and music pirates.

At this stage, it is not entirely clear how this will pan out. Some may say that this will be a way for Apple to ‘legitimise’ music piracy, but I for one am taking the optimistic approach.

It seems clear to me, that the $25 a year is a very little amount to pay compared to the piracy fines some people have received in the past — for Apple to distribute money back into the music industry.

Did Apple just kill music piracy? Perhaps not, but I am quite certain that the industry finally has a way to recover losses through online file sharing.

Related content:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

96
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: iTunes Match: Legitimising your illegal music collection?
TimPeris Updated - 8th Nov
@kcredden2 Why not just offer a service to get all the music you want for 25 bucks a year? If they are going to download a high-quality version then they are not even saving the transference costs... and assuming that the music was pirated then the users wouldn't own any rights on the songs...
Limit it to 25,000 songs a year if you want, but why force people to already have the file to access the matching service? Are they absorving the cost in an effort to try to make everyone go legit? money making ideas
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
What do you think?
zwhittaker 6th Jun
Has Apple single handedly saved the music industry? Will you 'legitimise' your music collection for $25 a year? Or are you sceptical and concerned by putting your music collection in the cloud could incriminate you? Have your say.
@zwhittaker

If not, then they didn't just kill music piracy.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@Will Pharaoh Well it's DRM free music. So, you can USB all of your music from your devices onto your iTunes -- it'll upload it, match it, replace it if it's of poor quality -- and the cost of it will support the record industry. Because it's DRM free, you can download it again and use it on any device. Pretty good solution from the looks of it.
@Will Pharaoh
As usual, you don't bother to even TRY to determine if your objection is supported by facts before posting.
Fail.
Again.
@zwhittaker Could you please tell me how this kills music piracy? So what if the music is now from an "official" source, it's still pirated music. This is a service that takes music that you've payed for and for 25$, gives it to you in the cloud. It's still supposed to be payed for, regardless of Match.
@Aerowind That's what I don't understand. I think it will increase piracy, because you can download thousands of dollars worth of music and then pay $25 to "legitimize" the songs. Would like to know more.
@Aerowind But the thing here is: iTunes is going to match, upgrade and replace those songs that have been added to your library by "less than legal" means as well. As long as the metadata is somewhat able to identify a song, artist, album, etc. Apple and the music labels are ceding that you already "own" this song and are willing to make it available to you for that $25 fee. This $25 will be divided up and dispersed between Apple and the labels/artists. So on one hand they are making a little extra money from items you may have legitimately purchased on CD, Amazon MP3, etc. On the other, they are getting a little money back from the illegally downloaded songs that are now being replaced. It really is a win-win. They were getting NOTHING from the pirates before. Now they have the opportunity to get SOMETHING through this matching service.

Piracy will never truly stop. But this is an excellent idea for both consumers and the evil recording industry. Kudos to everyone involved in making it happen...if it works as advertised!
@tmhale13 Making money? It's $25 dollars a year. I'd be shocked if that even covers Apple's server costs. It's an extremely minor payment that rewards being a pirate.
@Aerowind The fact is that Apple invested in the data centers. That investment was something they needed to do to compete with Google and others offering free web/cloud services. And all of that is free. This $25 is for an above and beyond service that honestly does not cost them much more in storage costs. Those digital music files are already being stored. That is how you purchase them in iTunes. One of my (and MANY others) biggest gripes against the labels is that they can charge as much for a digital download as they do for a mass produced CD. Even though there is no more media production, shipping and physical storage cost associated with it. The actual cost of a downloaded album should be WAY less than buying a physical CD.

Here, the labels will get some percentage of every dollar spent to "join" this top tier. That is simply money that they WERE NOT getting before. Even if you feel that it is a minuscule amount, it is still an amount they did not have before. And all at almost no additional cost to them. They have already produced and provided these tracks to Apple for sale in iTunes. So I do not see ANY cost leveled back on the labels. Apple is footing this bill...and I am sure they are not simply dong it out of the kindness of their hearts. They will be whistling as they stroll to the bank with their iPods playing "matched" songs through white earbuds.
@Aerowind Yeah how can 25$ for every song you can download stop piracy. It don't get this idea.
Ivan @ kirklands coupons
@zwhittaker None of the above. A lot of my music is from CDs and records that I already own or from live shows of share friendly artists. Apple wouldn't have any of my live material, so that offers very little benefit to me for that material... And I refuse to pay an additional fee to listen to media that I already purchased. I'm comfortable with paying to store it in the cloud, but I refuse to relicense content I already own.
0 Votes
+ -
Relicense?
jaypeg 10th Jun
@snoop0x7b

I think you misunderstand. iTunesMatch is not a relicensing service, it's a personalized re-distribution service for your entire music collection. You pay the $25 per year for the convenience of always having access to your music without having to bring your mobile devices back home to sync up with your pc. Don't want to pay the $25? Fine, don't use the service.
@snoop0x7b so true. Relicense the content that is so unbelievable. Why would i want to pay again for something. Ivan @ kirklands coupons
0 Votes
+ -
@zwhittaker Look, I'm a 23 year old guy working in a mom n pops IT shop. I do not make the most money in the world so i pirate the things I need if I cannot afford it. BUT I would be willing to pay apple 25 dollars a year to make my stuff legit. Its kind of funny though, because the way this translates to me is "Pirate all the music you want and we will make it legit for $25 a year"
@OneTwoc21 Uh, did you really just say "so i pirate the things I need if I cannot afford it"? So, if your car runs out of gas you siphon it from some poor schmucks car who HAS paid for it? Try using the correct word instead of "pirate". What word is that, you ask? Oh, sorry - it's "steal".

Here's the thing, OneTwoc21: despite what your socialist politicians have been cramming down your throat for 2 decades, you are entitled to nothing. If you can't afford to pay for something, guess what? You CAN'T HAVE IT. So why not do us all a favour and stop stealing stuff? It's people like you who make prices high in the first place.

I can't afford an LCD TV - ok with you if I swing by your place and "pirate" your one?...
Seriously? then that would be a great thing, we could save up right? Then do you think the music industry will be happy about that? I don't think so.

Mortgage Jacksonville FL
Mortgage Jacksonville Florida

Keyword Research
Must have been a good idea if they want these music download to be legit, anyway there is still a pay so, both will benefit.

Mortgage Tampa FL
Mortgage Tampa Florida

Mortgage Rates
I am not the biggest fan of Apple, but this concept does intrigue me. I do have a few questions for the lawyers though. I do not currently have any pirated music on my computer. What if I purchased this subscription and then started to go download pirated music off torrents. Would that be covered? I currently use Pandora for my music listening needs, but sometimes I am in the mood to listen to a specific album or song. Also my little girl is now getting to age where she is always wanting to buy specific songs or albums. Can I use this "legally" download torrented music file? If so I am sold. Of course the downside is I need to have an iOS 5 device which I don't know if I can do that. happy
@DustinU

Why would you bother to go through all the trouble to use a torrent? Just go to iTMS and double click. Done.
@DeusXMachina That costs $.99 and defeats the purpose of getting "free" music :P (not that I'm advocating piracy over purchasing, but OP is asking a question ABOUT that. )
@snoop0x7b
And this provides you with what benefit, exactly? It does NOT indemnify you in the eyes of the rights holders, it just saves you from taking up space in your iCloud account.
0 Votes
+ -
@DeusXMachina Starting to wonder if you are actually Steve Jobs or just his behind

You talk (well from reading the comments) like him, you defend everything Apple and fight everything not Apple or Anti-Apple.
0 Votes
+ -
Lets see...
kcredden2 6th Jun
I pay $25, and get legitimate copies. Then I can upload them and then re-copy them to 9 "legal" devices?

Ok firstly. Can they replace some incredibly rare and yes "pirated" songs? Like say, one Elvis song that is his own parody of his own "Love me tender" ?

What if they decide once and for all, to stop iCloud. Then what happens to all those files? They go 'poof' into bit-dust like when MS, Wal-Mart and others decided to get out of the music subscription business and your stuck with files you can't even use anymore?

Can they also fix it so the files are MP3, not their proprietary AAC format?

Why AAC, if it's DRM free? I note too, that not all devices can playback AAC format.

Do you have to download nearly 150 megs of iTunes that everyone has said they detest, to do the copying?

The more you let companies do for you, the more rights you give away. You can do all this now, yourself, with free software. They can't take away those files then, or use them as they want without your permissions.

I think the best idea; rip the songs from legitimately bought CDRs, archive them it in a lossless format like FLAC, and use those to make MP3s. Then copy them to what ever device you wish.

My solution is a tiny bit more work and keeps you away from Apple's near-totalitarian acting service, and guess what? It works even on dial-up, and is free! Wow! What a concept!

Sorry, I'll continue to be a 'pirate', ripping songs off CDs I buy (and I might add, still no RIAA sponsored artists, unless they're used CDs. ), archived the way I want too, playing on what device I want to play them on The same goes with the MPAA DVDs too.

- Kc
@kcredden2 To Add

"You can access your purchase history from the iTunes Store on your Mac, PC, iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch. And since you already own that music, you can tap to download your songs or albums to any of your devices.1"

Not so sure you are going to be able to "download" the songs you didnt purchase on Itunes. Stream yes - download unknown.
@kcredden2 The way I see this is:
iTunes Matching can only provide you songs that are within the 18 million songs that are available for purchase. If your Elvis parody of an Elvis song is not available for purchase in iTunes, then it is not something that can be "matched". Therefore, you would need to upload it to your iCloud account if you want it available in that manner. Otherwise, just sync it to your device via cable/iTunes.

As for losing tracks if iCloud goes belly-up, I believe that once you "match" your songs they are synced back to your physical library. That means you now have that actual track. Not just a way to access it remotely. This is similar to how the Amazon MP3 service works. I purchase an album and it is both downloaded to my device/library AND stored for cloud access. So there is no real risk of loosing your songs. So it is not a subscription service, but a buy-in to download "replacement" files. And they "can't take away those files". They have been downloaded to your device. Again, not stored ONLY in the iCloud space.

On the AAC front, you are spot on. If you prefer MP3 because it plays on more devices/platforms, than you may not really want to go this route. In small doses I do not mind using iTunes to convert from AAC to MP3 (a handy, lesser-known trick in iTunes). But I am an iDevice user, so AAC works just fine on all my gadgets. But FLAC or other lossless formats are still not possible from digital downloads from most legitimate places (other than occasional special offers from the artists themselves).
@tmhale13 & Bodazapha - AAC is not "their proprietary format" it's an open format that has been designed to replace MP3.

If you currently don't have an AAC device, you will in a few years, MP3 is being phased out and replaced with AAC by all the equipment makers and music services.

AAC has been standardized by ISO and IEC, as part of the MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 specifications, so it will replace MP3 over time. You can learn more here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding
To Pederson, AAC circa 1997 was "hoped" to replace the MP3 circa 1993. Just how long do you think it will take AAC will replace MP3?
@Bodazapha
As of the 6th of June? Maybe 6 months?
If you currently don't have an AAC device, you will in a few years, MP3 is being phased out and replaced with AAC by all the equipment makers and music services.

Been hearing that for years and it hasn't happened yet and I doubt it ever will. Much as you'd like to think that will happen.

mp3 is just too ubiquitous out there.
@kcredden2 Why not just offer a service to get all the music you want for 25 bucks a year? If they are going to download a high-quality version then they are not even saving the transference costs... and assuming that the music was pirated then the users wouldn't own any rights on the songs...
Limit it to 25,000 songs a year if you want, but why force people to already have the file to access the matching service? Are they absorving the cost in an effort to try to make everyone go legit? money making ideas
Or... I can just continue to listen to my music, for free.
@Droid101

Only if you get absolutely no more music.

Oh, didn't think of that before you peeked out from under your bridge?
@Droid101 And you are also free to continue posting your nonsensical drivel like always.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't get it
raul.vejar@... 6th Jun
Why not just offer a service to get all the music you want for 25 bucks a year? If they are going to download a high-quality version then they are not even saving the transference costs... and assuming that the music was pirated then the users wouldn't own any rights on the songs...
Limit it to 25,000 songs a year if you want, but why force people to already have the file to access the matching service? Are they absorving the cost in an effort to try to make everyone go legit?
Just don't get it
@raul.vejar@...
How is any of this "forcing" people who already have the file to access the service?

"Just don't get it"

Clearly.
FYI, periods are your friend.
@raul.vejar@... They are not absorbing the cost in an effort to make everyone go legit, they are absorbing the cost to add convenience for their users. If you think you can get all the record labels to sign on to a service that allows users to download up to 25K songs a year for $25/yr I suggest you do it as it will be a hit.
Can you just tag junk .mp3 files with all the album info, then say its said album and get the music without even downloading it illegally?
@JohnnyIdaho

The service is not based on metatags.
1) It looks like matched music is streamed to your device. If you're online, you get Apple's version. If you're offline, you get your version. Here's what Apple says:

"iTunes determines which songs in your collection are available in the iTunes Store. Any music with a match is automatically added to your iCloud library for you to listen to anytime, on any device. Since there are more than 18 million songs in the iTunes Store, most of your music is probably already in iCloud. All you have to upload is what iTunes cant match. Which is much faster than starting from scratch. And all the music iTunes matches plays back at 256-Kbps iTunes Plus quality even if your original copy was of lower quality."

2) What if I only want a subset of my iCloud music on my device? Does iCloud act like iTunes in that I can pick to sync just subsets by artist, album, genre, playlist,... And can i do this to a Mac as well as an iOS device (I'd jump at a Macbook Air, but my iTunes is too large... I'd like to just sync a portion my my Macbook, like I do to my iPhone.)
@sscutchen Whatever songs from your library that it matches are added to your iCloud library and anything that they can not match is uploaded. From there you can determine what is or is not synced to other devices and the original library is untouched, ripped songs not overwritten by the iTunes version.
it scans more than that think of something kind of like soundhound.
0 Votes
+ -
What About Amazon's Cloud Service?
brucegil@... 7th Jun
Will Amazon's recently started cloud music service make a similar offer? If it did, I would strongly consider it. Right now, I am not interested in depending on internet access to listen to my music.
@brucegil@...
And how is that necessary? Did you even RTFA?
@DeusXMachina Did you even RTFA?
Obviously not sad
0 Votes
+ -
Its about time the record companies viewed recordings as free adverts for the live performance. The price of a ticket for a live performance is astonishing! There are many bands and singers who take this view. As a former record producer I firmly believe that one day soon the MP3/AAC download will be free.
@fivish

Dream on. If that were the case in the 60s, bands like the Beatles that NEVER played live would no longer produce records.
@fivish They make FAR more money from CD sales than they could ever make from even the most successful tours.
0 Votes
+ -
Duplicate, Duplicate, Duplicate, Duplicate................

Unless iCloud does not share the same leprosy ridden code as iTunes.
@neil.postlethwaite@...

Hundreds of millions of people do not share your opinion.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix