Microsoft's So.cl network launched amid Facebook press

Summary: Microsoft's So.cl is now out of beta and available publicly - but is it really aimed at students?

While most pairs of technologically-inclined eyes have been diverted by the Facebook IPO, Microsoft has quietly launched So.cl, a social 'network' that ran in beta and was tested by university students last year.

Originating from Microsoft's FUSE labs, the network is promoted as a tool created for use by students and academics for research purposes. Pronounced "social", the service has not been reported as a Facebook rival or Twitter rip-off. It is, instead, an additional layer to social networking -- and requires users to login through either a Facebook or Windows Live account.

Running on the same themes as other social media sites -- including Facebook, Twitter, StumbleUpon and Tumblr -- the 'social search' can be used to share web pages of interest, assemble montages of media (think Pinterest as an example) and collaborate to discuss or extend the sharing of items -- So.cl may become more than simply a research-based tool. All searches are public by default.

So.Cl states in its FAQ:

"We expect students to continue using products such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and other existing social networks, as well as Bing, Google and other search tools.

We hope to encourage students to reimagine how our everyday communication and learning tools can be improved, by researching, learning and sharing in their everyday lives."

Microsoft asserted the site is not meant to compete with Facebook or search engines last year, however, it is not closed purely to student use. In fact, with these kinds of features, Microsoft may not be aiming to compete directly with a force as large as Facebook -- but potentially become an additional layer to the social networking world that will become as popular as Pinterest eventually.

Through the combination of features that are popular on other social networking sites -- such as Pinterest's Boards feature -- and the attempt to encourage students to use it, it may be that Microsoft is taking a long-term approach to break into the social networking sphere -- with students as its first port of call.

Image credit: Screenshot C.Osborne

Related:

Topics: Networking, Collaboration, Microsoft, Social Enterprise

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

9 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • socl

    Not bad when you play with it for a while. Not so sure about having the interests set up and having people you don't know on your Feeds. It is great other then that. Kind of how facebook was before it got too much junk.
    imsimsj
    • another M$ flop

      this is the next myspace.
      The Linux Geek
      • You're an idiot!

        Microsoft could produce 10 more flops, and they still wouldn't be close to touching the flop king that is Google, a company that continually releases worthless beta products filled with glitches and bugs.
        jhammackHTH
      • Microsoft survives on re-releases of Windows and Xbox. No innovation.

        Wow, can you hear the emotional ties to Microsoft offered in jhammackHTH's response? During the Ballmer era, what has Microsoft produced that wasn't just a re-release of a prior successful product? Really, other than office, windows, and Xbox, what has there been? Zune? lol

        This part about Google products having bugs is especially funny coming on a day when Chrome reportedly surpassed IE for the prior week. I am sure there is plenty of Microsoft frustration going around today. What a joke. I think they may end up putting the IE logo next to the word "Bug" in the dictionary.
        Marc Ello
      • Please make a real argument

        "This part about Google products having bugs is especially funny coming on a day when Chrome reportedly surpassed IE for the prior week."

        That's about as ridiculous as saying "I can prove that pork is better for you than deer, more people eat it", it makes no sense.
        Michael Alan Goff
      • @Michael Alan Goff: Facts are a real argument.

        Sorry the facts got in the way, but the LA times reported that according to stat counter Chrome surpassed IE last week in usage.

        http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-google-chrome-browser-20120521,0,3235434.story

        You can deny that IE has problems all you like and vote "-1" to make yourself feel better, but that doesn't change the facts. Let the spin begin.
        Marc Ello
      • You stated two separate things

        and tried to link them. I'm not denying facts. I'm denying that those two have anything to do with each other in the way that more people eating pork doesn't make it better than deer. More people use Android than iOS, yet I can't think of a single person who would argue that it has fewer bugs.

        Quality is not determined by the amount of people using something.
        Michael Alan Goff
  • Google+

    That splash picture is basically how I use Google+, awesome tool to have intelligent discussions about topics you want with other people around the world.
    beaverusiv
  • @ Marc Ello

    So wrong. Microsoft is far more innovative than Apple. The XBox is voice controlled and, unlike Siri, it works. The XBox is also motion controlled without the need for the user holding some gob of plastic and silicon. Apple is. supposedly, actively trying to copy both of these technologies for their TV. Microsoft had a touchscreen desk 5 years ago that supported 4 simultaneous users- Apple is, again supposedly, trying to create a touchscreen desk. Microsoft uses and regularly upgrades Direct X - Apple uses Open GL - created by SGI a billion years ago and barely touched since then. Microsoft has created a system using 'Live Tiles' - Apple still uses icons. A Windows PC can use an SSD as RAM or RAM as an SSD. A Windows PC can be used to develop games for computers, consoles, web, etc. Most major game engines are not even available for Apple's OS (development-wise it's a waste of time because Apple computers are too slow). The idea of Apple's innovation basically rides on the fact that most people have no idea of what the true state of technology is or ignore the obvious. Tablets were around long before the iPad. At the very least Quantel Henry Video Workstations, DaVinci Color Correction Systems and ATMs had touchscreens 10 years before Apple even thought about a phone. And they all ran on Windows NT (except for the ATMs). Apple is bragging about their 'retina display' which is at best half the resolution of the paper thin, super smart Samsung Ultra-HD TVs and at worst 1/8th the resolution for an extreme model (can't wait for Apple to start that war, the only thing holding Samsung back is a lack of content which Apple will undoubtedly demand and get with their deep pockets). And if Apple is so innovative why can't they make their own Office software?
    kennyrosenyc