New UK file sharing law challenged by ISPs in court

By | March 23, 2011, 9:29am PDT

Summary: Two major ISPs are at the UK high court to challenge elements of the new counter-piracy laws, that relate to illegal file-sharers.

ISPs in England are challenging parts of the Digital Economy Act, which targets illegal downloaders and file-sharers.

BT and TalkTalk, both leaders in the broadband marketshare in the UK, are at the High Court today, arguing that elements of the bill were rushed through parliament last year without adequate scrutiny.

Under the current law, film and music providers can monitor illegal activity on peer-to-peer networks and collate IP addresses of those who infringe copyright. They can then apply to a court to force an ISP to hand over the name and billing address of the person alleged to have downloaded illegal content.

But there have been several cases where people were wrongly accused of illegally downloading copyrighted material.

In the United States, however, recent legal proceedings states that an ‘IP address does not equal a person’, referring to co-habitants and student households in particular.

A similar principle is hoped to be applied in the UK, with the ISPs in court hoping to clear up the definitions of the act, arguing that an IP address does not identify the particular user but only the location of where the alleged infringement occurred.

Yet more and more people are resorting to upload sites and checking links on blogs to download music and films, instead of using peer-to-peer networks where users are becoming more aware of the risks involved.

The bill was passed shortly before the new government was formed, during what is known as the ‘wash up’ period, where outstanding bills and legislation are cleared up and voted on before Parliament is dissolved.

Related content:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: New UK file sharing law challenged by ISPs in court
Mectron 23rd Mar 2011
@P. Douglas wrote: Someone needs to beat the entertainment industry over the head with the Eight Amendment"

The RIAA/MPAA (the most dangerous criminals in the know universe) must be shutdown, all their member need to be fined at least a billion EACH, DRM need to be declare illegal and price of entertainment need to be regulated (DOWN) and a % of profit must set which once reached, the ? work instantly become PUBLIC DOMAIN.

Only in the USA (and UK it seem) you can have a group(s) (MPAA/RIAA) commiting crimes on a hourly basis, and yet are permited to operatred and destroy countless live and family accross the world.

the MPAA/RIAA as done more damage to USA citizens then all the wars and terrorist attacks combined ever did.
0 Votes
+ -
Must be great
Robert Hahn 23rd Mar 2011
It must be wonderful to live in a country where they have stamped out robbery, rape, and murder and can now move on to other important crimes.
0 Votes
+ -
Greater penalties for doing less
P. Douglas Updated - 23rd Mar 2011
@Robert Hahn,

In the U.S., if you steal a $900 laptop, you pay less fines than if you steal a $1 music track. Someone needs to beat the entertainment industry over the head with the Eight Amendment. Even the White House, which shamelessly lies in bed with the entertainment industry, wants to make it a felony to consume streaming media that is not legal - which very few people are able to determine with certainty.

With the rest of the economy, if your business environment changes, you adapt to it or go away. With the entertainment industry, if your business environment changes, you go to Congress to pass laws to keep it from happening.
@P. Douglas wrote: Someone needs to beat the entertainment industry over the head with the Eight Amendment"

The RIAA/MPAA (the most dangerous criminals in the know universe) must be shutdown, all their member need to be fined at least a billion EACH, DRM need to be declare illegal and price of entertainment need to be regulated (DOWN) and a % of profit must set which once reached, the ? work instantly become PUBLIC DOMAIN.

Only in the USA (and UK it seem) you can have a group(s) (MPAA/RIAA) commiting crimes on a hourly basis, and yet are permited to operatred and destroy countless live and family accross the world.

the MPAA/RIAA as done more damage to USA citizens then all the wars and terrorist attacks combined ever did.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix