ie8 fix

Open letter to Google: Chrome OS is already redundant

By | December 6, 2010, 10:43am PST

Summary: An open letter to Google: why are you so late to the operating system party, and have you already scuppered your chances with your delays, your hardware, and even the original concept?

Dear Google,

Oh dear. You’re a bit late to the party, aren’t you? I hope you read my other letter too, because I didn’t hear anything back from you. Where I come from, that’s considered a bit rude.

The problem is already, before I even get to the meat of this letter, is that the netbook boom is already in full swing. Sure, tablet devices like the iPad aren’t that bad, if you really pushed me to say it, and laptops are only popular because they have to be, but the netbook is surprisingly popular; in some cases outselling the high-specification fully fledged computers.

Eric Schmidt said that Chrome OS won’t be out now for at least next year, so you won’t even hit the Christmas market. You’ve already missed the Thanksgiving period, and as an Englishman even I know you American’s go crazy for tech around that time.

We heard that you are having a little gathering tomorrow, which is likely to lead to nothing but a massive anti-climax; announcing a branded netbook offering Chrome OS, but it is still nowhere near a consumer-friendly product. What gives?

Sure, you could hold off until next Christmas, but considering that the cloud-only operating system you have put your souls into (perhaps quite literally, knowing how ‘evil’ you all are) is already defunct with a shoddy concept to begin with, what’s the point? You can drag a dead, flogged horse to water, but you can’t drown it twice - to take the familiar saying and boil it into glue.

To make a point of order, if Chrome OS netbooks will cost between $300 and $450 as suggested a few months ago, I still see no incentive to buy one if, firstly it is limited to running Chrome OS only, and secondly if I can buy an ordinary netbook at a similar price and not more to only go and run the operating system of my choice.

Now, I’ve tried Chromium OS, which granted is only a developer build and not to be taken necessarily as a representation of the finished product, but you must know at this stage it is quite literally just a browser, and nothing more. But you know that, surely.

Even with a Chrome Web Store including plug-ins and applications which run solely in the browser specifically for Chrome OS, I cannot be persuaded to even consider this still to be a fruitful endeavour on your part. ‘Applications’ for Chromium as of yet are limited to simply links to services already available, and though Tweetdeck and other software makers are focusing on adding applications to the Chrome Web Store, you are forgetting one, simple thing.

It is not possible to live entirely in the cloud, and for once I am not talking directly about the student demographic. 

Admittedly the web browser is arguably the most prominent application on any operating system or platform. Chrome OS would be ideal if you are simply planning on donning it to quick-and-easy browser-only users. But why would the consumer trade in their chunky laptop or slimline netbook running Windows XP or Ubuntu 10.10 for an operating system which above all else restricts your access?

I think you’ve drowned in an intense vat of rivalry with other operating system manufacturers like Microsoft, Apple and Canonical, and are desperate to compete in an area you are not only lacking in confidence but also the expertise. Give up and focus on making existing products better, like Google Apps for Education which could really do with a firm boot up the backside.

I’m only saying this because I have love in my heart and I don’t want to see bad things happen to good people. Sorry, scrap that - I can’t pull off gratuitous niceties; anybody who knows me can vouch for this.

Nonetheless, lots of love,

Zack x

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
56
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Open letter to Google: Chrome OS is already redundant
YeomanDroid 9th Jun
$20.00 is pretty expensive, that is $240.00 minus the $50.00 a month you will need for Cloud Storage. Oh, we should not forget the 3G connection you'll need which data carriers will rape you (like Verizon) if you go over your paltry 5GB limit!!! Hmm, what does that cost monthly? $50.00
I don't get it either, but I will at least wait to see the actual product before I make a call to abandon the idea. Maybe they know something we don't know.
0 Votes
+ -
Could it be
Dietrich T. Schmitz, ~ Your Linux Advocate 6th Dec 2010
@Michael Kelly
That the browser is merely a canvas in which your virtual desk top will live?
0 Votes
+ -
Don't bust DonnieBoy's wet dream
LBiege Updated - 6th Dec 2010
You guys are too mean. No ChromeOS? Ouch, that'd break his heart.
0 Votes
+ -
Yea great...
Bruizer 7th Dec 2010
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate

A bunch of Citrix Windows boxees running "in the cloud" so I don't have to run them locally.

I want some of the Whaky weed being served at the Googleplex.
0 Votes
+ -
Pity on the poor boy....
linux for me 9th Dec 2010
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, Your Linux Advocate

Poor Zack is just a kid. Give him time to grow up and learn a few things in this world. Some day he will learn. happy
0 Votes
+ -
What's the point?
Keith Porter Updated - 6th Dec 2010
I don't get Chrome OS. I know what they're trying to accomplish, but 'i think they would have been better to release a streamlined linux distro with an app store. Something like Android Desktop...

I know that Chrome OS at it's heart uses a linux kernel. But still...browser only?
0 Votes
+ -
This
Cylon Centurion 6th Dec 2010
Has made my day. Thanks for the good read.
0 Votes
+ -
Easily pleased by any chance? (nt)
Economister 6th Dec 2010
@Cylon Centurion 0005

nt
@Economister

Why are you supporting yet another thin client scam Economister? Any Google shares?
0 Votes
+ -
I'm happy that
Cylon Centurion 7th Dec 2010
@Economister

Someone else share my views on this useless OS, and that I'm not the only one not gobbling up Google's propaganda.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Open letter to Google: Chrome OS is already redundant
babyboomer57 Updated - 6th Dec 2010
Wait a minute. Weren't you singing a different tune last year when the Chrome OS was announced?

Regardless, I don't see a proliferation of Chrome OS netbooks (or anything else) in the near future. Manufacturers will see the limitations, and they already know that few businesses or consumers will be interested. Not only is that a hurdle, but devices will have to be produced that the OS has hardware drivers to work with it, just like Ubuntu. You saw how well that went over with the public.

I think you are correct, they are too late to the game. It takes YEARS to create an OS that component manufacturers won''t shun and refuse to supply drivers for. Just ask Canonical about that. The big three OS providers - MS, Apple, and Linux - still face a daily battle trying to keep up with the changes, and I don't think Google stands a chance of competing. And don't even get me started on security - a cloud based OS? It doesn't get any more un-secure than that.

Google, stick with Android and the Chrome browser, and improve the cloud apps you already have. We have enough OS's to choose from already.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@babyboomer57 That was a year ago, to be fair. Promising to solve world hunger a year ago, and still nothing changed today means absolutely nothing - for example.
@zwhittaker - If you say so.

Personally, I feel like solving world hunger is not something to give up on just because it hasn't changed in a year. I also believed a year ago that I would be in better shape physically this year than I was then, but that didn't happen. I still hold out hope for next year, though. That doesn't mean 'absolutely nothing' to me, sorry.

Still, in principal, I agree with the point of your story.
0 Votes
+ -
Ah another pronouncement...
zkiwi 6th Dec 2010
Without the hint, or semblance of a clue.

If being late to market makes one redundant then I guess you should spin a copy of this letter off to Microsoft regarding the redundancy of WP7 and to Google again wondering why they bothered with Android. I guess you also haven't noticed how many new types of pizza have been created and marketed. Why? Surely they're redundant.
0 Votes
+ -
Preach It, Bro!
PreachJohn 6th Dec 2010
@zkiwi---Spot On!
Many worthwhile products and services didn't go at all according to plan, but repeatedly awry. The venerable US Macy's Dept Store originally bankrupted some 7 times before success. And Colonel Saunders Kentucky Fried Chicken, as well as author Zane Grey, were both not men in their 60's before they finally struck paydirt?
Never despise the day of small, or difficult for that matter, beginnings.
@preachjohn
0 Votes
+ -
I don't see this as being a big hit in any way. But the idea is intriguing. You mentioned that Google should spend more time working on apps for Education. Well in one way, Chrome OS is a great one. With a low powered OS like this many public schools would be able to save a lot of money on whatever desktop machines they use with Windows and do all of their work online with Google Docs and other similar online programs. Similarly, many governments here in the United States have switched from using MS Office to using the Google suite of applications. Now they won't even have to worry about paying for a Windows license next upgrade cycle.

In the end it'll all come down to price. If a Chrome Netbook comes in the price range of $300 to $450, it's already more than a lot of bare minimum Windows netbooks. I wouldn't mind getting one of these for some work if the machine comes in at around $150 to $200 using the same hardware as a Windows device, but without having to pay for a Windows license.
@Darkninja962@... I agree with you, however I need to point out to you that some of Google's products are not 'free' for businesses or the government. They pay a license fee just like MS customers, just not as big a price up front.
0 Votes
+ -
I, for one, am very excited to install a copy of Chrome OS as soon as it comes out. You say that it's not possible to live entirely in the cloud, but I've fully converted to Google Docs and don't use any software on my Windows machine besides the Chrome browser. I look forward to a 5-second boot time, no spyware/viruses, and no clutter on my hard drive.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@graemeerickson Wow.
0 Votes
+ -
Late/redundant?
Economister 6th Dec 2010
I think you may have missed the entire point. I do not see anything having beaten it to the market nor replaced its intended functionality.

Slow news day?
0 Votes
+ -
Phone OSes
Lester Young 6th Dec 2010
@Economister

I don't see any selling point of Chrome over phone OSes.
0 Votes
+ -
Can I put my Phone OS on a netbook?
Michael Alan Goff 6th Dec 2010
If not, then moot point is moot.
@Economister : Ever heard of Linux? What do you think Chrome OS is? VAX VMS?
In the future everything will be in the cloud and Chrome OS is getting us ready for that day. I'm also looking forward to a 5 second boot time and no spyware/viruses. I already live in the cloud. Come on up here, the air is great!
0 Votes
+ -
I don't think it means what you think it means
Michael Alan Goff 6th Dec 2010
"re?dun?dant/ri?d?nd?nt/Adjective
1. No longer needed or useful; superfluous.
2. (of words or data) Able to be omitted without loss of meaning or function."

So for it to be redundant... something else would have to be offering the functionality that it is offering. First we have to look at what Google Chrome is supposed to do. Google Chrome is supposed to be an "all in" Cloud approach. It is supposed to be a portal to the internet, and it is supposed to take up very little space and be an instant-on tool.

Linux distros? Light weight, not instant on, not yet all in for the cloud.
Windows? None of the above.
Android? Close, but not meant for things with keyboards. Also, I don't see this as an "all in" cloud approach. I also heard it wasn't instant on, or "merely a portal to the internet".
iOS? See Android.

What is the thing that -really- makes this redundant?
0 Votes
+ -
I thought the whole blog was....
Economister 6th Dec 2010
@goff256

rather misguided too.
@goff256 I get instant on with Windows 7 - I just sleep it when I'm not using it.

"all in Cloud" isn't a feature, it's a description of a fantasy some people have. A fantasy that is filled with pain when you get a poor internet connection. Of course they always conveniently forget that part.

"light weight" used to mean something - back in the days when computers were slow and limited. Today, even a $300 netbook has more than 100 GB of space. OSes can be big, but none that I know of are that big.

Does Chrome OS really add anything new to the experience? No.
0 Votes
+ -
"All in the cloud"
Cylon Centurion 7th Dec 2010
Will never happen. There is nobody in their right mind that would want that.

@goff256 ChromeOS is late to the game, and at this point, Google has failed to create a buzz with it in anyone but you and Donnieboy. It adds nothing new to netbooks that have been proven to successfully run Windows 7 or your linux distro of choice.
0 Votes
+ -
Both of you have one problem
Michael Alan Goff 7th Dec 2010
in your judgment of this OS: You guys discount the value of a cloud solution.
0 Votes
+ -
"Both of you have one problem
in your judgment of this OS: You guys discount the value of a cloud solution."

Whether an OS has the ability to run local apps really has nothing to do with a "cloud solution." Any computer today can run a browser with no troubles at all. Having the ability to access local apps in no way, shape, or form hinders my ability to run "cloud" apps.

(whatever the "cloud" is - a purposefully vague term that really doesn't have much of a meaning at all)
Zack usually misses the mark. Nothing new.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@Alan Henry By all means expand upon this and not leave it ambiguous and open to personal ridicule. Please, carry on.
0 Votes
+ -
I think .....
Economister 6th Dec 2010
@zwhittaker

it has been articulated by a few people here already Zack, for example goff256 and myself. In my opinion, you are off the mark on this one. It frankly looks like click bait, with little or no substance.
0 Votes
+ -
@zwhittaker

From (all) your post, I don't think you have an understanding of what an operating system is or does.

That makes sense, your major or minor is not computer science.

PS. You should've had someone in the CS department read it before posting. Maybe that's something you should consider.
@Alan Henry
So tell us how a Freelance writer from Ziff would write this up.
0 Votes
+ -
Linux is redundant. We already had scads of versions of UNIX when Linux came along.

And all the commercial brands of Linux are redundant. We already had scads of free, downloadable binaries when people started selling Linux.

Chrome OS will truly be redundant if it doesn't find a way to add value to the marketplace. Whether other operating systems/environments preceded it doesn't many anything.
There better be some pretty good hardware if Google thinks consumers will shell out 450+ for their crappy netbook. Chrome is only worth 5 bucks at most. For people who actually want things to just work, you can't pay them to use Chrome. Thanks Google for making Apple look so good.
0 Votes
+ -
Google Chrome + Microsoft + Linux + Computing
migrationking Updated - 6th Dec 2010
The main reason I see from the outcome of Google Chrome OS is the technology itself. Self-replicating updates (Microsoft could adopt the "technology" and virtually eliminate WSUS for Admins! = $$$ Costs Savings on WSUS servers and AV software), cloud-based software (Office365 "COULD" get to the point where it is 100% in the browser.) Supply just needs demand and for the government there is a huge incentive to move to this path for security, data integrity (i.e. no more Wikileaks kind of incidents), ease of usage (full browser support!) and portability (remember when that laptop got lost for the VA with literally millions of SSN's?). There are too many benefits to the technology itself and the cloud.

This is not Google vs. Microsoft. This is technology advancement, evolution and development. Wake up!
Dear Zack:

I suppose ten years back you may have told us that with Yahoo, Excite, and Alta Vista, we were both late and redundant with web search. There were naysayers, but we were confident that we had a better idea.

Please be sure, the last important operating system, whether it comes from Mountain View or Redmond or Bangalore, has not been written. An operating system represents a projection and abstraction of the hardware, users and programs to be run on it and as these change and as operating systems interact with the real world, we become more experienced, so, computing at the system level, and at the distributed network level, improves.

Theory meets world in experiment, i.e., building, releasing and testing. By doing this one, someone will be able to do a better one tomorrow.

That leaves a few questions: how does your life degrade in any meaningful way with the release of Chrome OS? And why do you think you know more about what we are working towards than we do? Also, could you please point us to any relevant technical papers in your CV regarding these matters; we would like to think you were must than just another person up in the bleachers kibitzing the football players oh so far away.

All the best for the holidays.

Google
Neither dictated nor read and totally fabricated.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@DannyO_0x98 Ten years ago, I had no idea where New York was. I was 12.
@zwhittaker What? They don't teach geography over the pond until 7th grade? Really?

Sorry, couldn't resist. Continue about your business.....
0 Votes
+ -
Chrome OS = Another Linux distro
Gis Bun 6th Dec 2010
Asidfe from the name, is there any selling point to another Linux distro? That is all it is. Only difference is that they'll put a browser as the desktop [the partial equivalrent of making whatever browser in Windows as the new explorer.exe].

Google is aming this thing at netbooks - whiler not ac dying markey, it has taken a hit from iPads and the [soon] tablets. On top of that just about every other Linux distro runs on a netbook or has a separate install disk for them.

Waste of money. Google could of spent the man hours on something better like stopping spammers from using their goo.gl URl shortener site.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Open letter to Google: Chrome OS is already redundant
Shyam Madhavan Sarada Updated - 7th Dec 2010
Hey, at least it gives you something to write about. You should be thankful... ingrate!

0 Votes
+ -
It is just Linux with the Google name in front of it.

That is if it ever becomes more than just vaporware.
How long DOES it take to make an "OS" which is just Chrome tacked onto Linux?

I think there's more problems with it than they want to admit. Coding the thing shouldn't take this long.
0 Votes
+ -
Netbooks already dead
jscott418 7th Dec 2010
I think Chrome OS has been put on hold. I really believe Google felt the market is not there. We have seen Linux type platforms on a Netbook before and they failed. Even though Google claims Chrome OS will be different. The problem that its different from a Windows OS which runs so much in software will still be a problem. Mostly because what Google has offered as alternatives such as Google Docs has not been that successful.
0 Votes
+ -
Has anyone noticed...
DavidL98 7th Dec 2010
...how horrible a writer this guy is? This article was so badly written I threw up my arms in disgust by the second paragraph. I don't have a clue what his point was, and never will.
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed!
Eleutherios 7th Dec 2010
@DavidL98
+ 1!
English is my second language and I struggled to understand the meaning of this "blog." Shouldn't they have copy editors at zdnet? Or maybe simply running a grammar checker would help. This blogger seems very inexperienced, talking about topics he doesn't quite master, and trying to pass off as a technical "pundit" (I'm sure people at Google have thought about what Chrome should be...).
0 Votes
+ -
You can try ChromeOS, just get a build of ChromiumOS and install on spare machine. It is a completely different way of using a computer, not just another OS. All apps are browser based and leverage HTML5. Light weight games, word processor, spreadsheet, calendar, email, anything flash based. Instant on and very very secure. HTML5 does allow for times when there is no connection, like Google Gears did. No updating apps, no virus checkers. Upgrade to a new machine? Turn it on, log in and you are up and running - no mucking about with csv or a pst. We will see whether they can sell the concept.
$20.00 is pretty expensive, that is $240.00 minus the $50.00 a month you will need for Cloud Storage. Oh, we should not forget the 3G connection you'll need which data carriers will rape you (like Verizon) if you go over your paltry 5GB limit!!! Hmm, what does that cost monthly? $50.00

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix