Should you give up your Facebook password for a dream job?

By | February 23, 2011, 4:45am PST

Summary: A Maryland government employee refused to hand over his Facebook login password during an interview to get his old job back. Would you give prospective employers the keys to your Facebook?

Imagine this. You’ve left university with a good degree, and after months of searching you have found what could be the perfect job.

The one caveat is that you are required to hand over the keys to your Facebook profile and other social networks to proceed.

But for one person, the intrusion was too much to bear. A Maryland corrections officer refused to hand over his Facebook login password during an interviewto be recertified for his old job with the Department of Corrections.

The practice has now been suspended pending a review, which was designed to check for gang and organised crime affiliations, though it calls into question the practices prospective employers in both the public and private sector can ask of you to gain employment.

How far would you go to attain that perfect job? Would you give up the most private and intimate details of your life, or even your email and social network passwords?

However, it makes sense to screen and to vet prospective employees at the highest level to ensure they are trustworthy, not liable to persuasion and pressure, and that they are not connected to other criminals who could exploit their position, like police officers and intelligence officers.

These practices, known as vetting, occur from working with children in youth projects and to the highest levels of government, to ensure unethical and unsavoury characters do not slip through the filters.

There is no doubt there are some jobs out there which do require the highest level of security and assurances from employers, but what about regular employment?

Personally, to some extent, I am in favour of this to a lesser or greater extent. Many others will disagree. But I think that social networking takes up such a large part of our lives, it is important for a government as an employer to at least see, along with regular vetting processes, to validate whether a person is connected to people involved in crime which could undermine their position.

On the other hand, it is private - provided one locks down their profile from the outside world, and should be treated like postal mail, email and our personal preferences to life and society. But for ‘regular’ employment should not ask for passwords to check what a person is like, as this is a gross invasion of privacy.

It is a highly contentious issue and there are no right and wrong answers. I suppose it all boils down to the individual person.

Should you give up your Facebook password for a dream job?

Related content:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

147
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Security clearance
KerrieG 7th Mar
But that is different than you average run of the mill employer.
No Facebook at all - whatever do I do??
0 Votes
+ -
My dilemma too
Economister Updated - 23rd Feb 2011
@drf999

I would have to leave that field blank and probably not even get an interview.

In all seriousness, if you put questionable aspects of you life/character on the web, in ANY form/location, you are reckless regarding your own future, also known as an idiot.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree...
dave@... 23rd Feb 2011
@Economister

Most people are idiots in search of a village. People do not understand what the spagetti test is regarding social media. If you wouldn't tape it to your front door for all your neighbors to see, you shouldn't post it on the web.
@Economister ... True ... but incomplete. Never label people as fools; you were such a fool at one time also. More importantly are the slugs and dregs that will make stuff up about you and spread it around. Your followers, if you're facing reality about who you let follow you, may know better, but not a stranger or gvt Fed or state agency.
Actually, a Google on Economister
turns up some interesting information on you and how well you don't have much hidden away from the public. Yet call anyone who does that a fool.
Placing an entire group of people under one negative label such as "fool" is folly for anyone to do, let alone you. Unless you've stolen the name you appear to be shall we say less than great to do business with.
@drf999
I don't have a Facebook account either!! what do I do?? do you need one to get a job these days? apply on facebook LOL
@drf999
Same Here!
0 Votes
+ -
No Facebook account = one less problem
schmandel@... 25th Feb 2011
@drf999
What you should do is stay as smart as you are and keep yourself that way.

If you like you may join the global campaign that is underway to saturate Facebook with dead-end accounts populated with erroneous information. I maintain hundreds of such with automated scripting simulating normal activity. Since it pumps their numbers Facebook doesn't really mind, it's just another aspect of Zuckerberg et al. studiously avoid the serious problems they are creating for personal freedom. Having people know Facebook to be an an unreliable miasma is the best thing for driving out the data miners and other parasites who feed on it.
As an employer I wouldn't hire someone with a Facebook account. No need to ask for their password. Just ask them if they have a Facebook account. If the answer is yes then end of interview.
@Goldie07: That would be illegal in The UK and I'm guessing USA too?
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@bradavon Under UK law (RIPA), it's illegal to not disclose your password when requested to by law enforcement or during a criminal case (http://www.zdnet.com/blog/igeneration/uk-teenager-jailed-for-not-disclosing-password/6372) - so if the police asked you during a recruitment interview, it could be interpreted as such.
@bradavon

Illegal in the US as well you just can't discriminate against some one because you dislike their ideals.
@Goldie07 apparently you have no intention of hiring any persons out of college or anyone in touch with society. As an advertiser, social media is a great tool that can and has been used effectively. Not everything on Facebook is bad, and for you to have that blanket approach is down right ridiculous.
0 Votes
+ -
Advertising and social media
Economister Updated - 23rd Feb 2011
@orangeshirtguy

Great tool for whom? I don't want your intrusive, targeted and stupid ads in my face.
@Economister

What are you talking about? Just ignore the ads. It's very simple. I do it everyday all over the internet. I couldn't tell what they were promoting anywhere EXCEPT on Zdnet. Zdnet's ads are very intrusive...I just clicked to close two flybys before being able to read this article. Yet, you still come here. I'm sure you'll say you use adblock, which is pretty much like pirating the whole internet that's free because of the ads.
0 Votes
+ -
@orangeshirtguy >>

Guess you don't use the right browser/tools. AdBlockPro, Ghostery, and turning on my popup blocker=NO ads bothering me.
0 Votes
+ -
@orangeshirtguy Well I can say one thing. I'm targeted by something from my FB page...I avoid them like the plague. So in my opinion - it fails from a marketing perspective.
0 Votes
+ -
Any reason?
safesax2002 23rd Feb 2011
Any reason why? This seems extreme to say the least.
0 Votes
+ -
@Goldie07
Becasue that's what would happen.

Let me know when your going out of busness sale starts. I want to see what I can get on the cheap!
@Goldie07
You're a pretty stupid boss. Of course that's probably a compliment for a luddite such as yourself.
@Goldie07 What about people that spend their time posting useless comments on tech blogs? Would you hire them?

It's kindof silly to immediately discount over half a billion people just because they use social networking. Also, my guess is you aren't actually an employer.
0 Votes
+ -
Too right!
chrisbranning557@... 23rd Feb 2011
@Goldie07
Absolutely!! If you are such a loser / stupid enough to be on FaceBook then you don't need to be on staff.

Ha!! too true!
0 Votes
+ -
I assume therefore...
Yam Digger 23rd Feb 2011
@Goldie07
...that you're in the business of making buggy whips and ladies' corsets ?
0 Votes
+ -
@Goldie07 I think you set yourself up for serious problems with that. There are many criminals out there who do not use Facebook or any other social media.

Until there is a clear cut way to justify the need to invade someone's privacy that will not work. It appears your company is NOT an EOE then. You are stating if a person will not give up personal information, which has nothing to do with the job just a whim on the companies part they will be marked as suspect.

Certain industries may need it when it comes to anyone who will be around children. By all means they should be protected from predators. But everyone who uses Facebook or any other social media is a not a predator. If I said no to giving my password, and for the record I don't use Facebook but I do others, am I know suspect? Is my name on some list of undesirable employees, does it no longer matter than my credit rating and background checks are impeccable but because I do not feel it is the business of a possible employer to have access to my information used solely for my home personal use now I am unemployable?

That is slanderous, unethical, and irresponsible on your part to even suggest it. And by not hiring someone based purely on that with no proof to back it up is slanderous.

The practice is suspended for a reason. Until it can be done in a way to show it is in the best interest of the job being offered and doesn't make a company no longer EOE, or abusing a persons right to privacy, and doesn't stigmatize a persons name it will be on the shelf.
@Goldie07 : Why? How about giving your reasons for such a drastic move. I have facebook to connect with my high school class, and friends from college. I could do this without facebook, but it makes it easier. So what? Does that make me a criminal? Are you rashly assuming I'm going to spend all day on it like some kind of addict? Rather assuming of you, don't you think?
I'm still wondering why this would be an issue anyways. They had processes for checking poeple out BEFORE social networking, so why does anyone have to give up their right to personal privacy to get a job? This is no different than discriminating based on skin, gender or age and it disgusts me.
No one should have to give an all-access pass to their personal lives to their employer. That's why there's the saying, "home stays at home, job stays at work".

Of course, greedy companies would rather you work while at home as well, but that's another soapbox.
@Goldie07

As a potential employee ... who doesn't do facebook and who doesn't find the concept particularly interesting, personally ... if I knew that you as my potential employer had that attitude ... I would immediately cross you off my list of suitable employers.

I have zero interest in working for an employer who makes irrational, emotional business decisions such as hiring or not hiring employees, for reasons that are entirely unrelated to the needs of the business or the skills and talent of potential employees and what they bring to the table.

Let's call that a Win-Win ... you have the kind of employees you want, and I have the kind of employer I want.
@Goldie07 I'm surprised at such ignorance. For one its none of your business whether someone has a facebook account. Secondly if you think nobody that works for you has a facebook account your sadly mistaken. I would estimate about 75% have one where I work. If you don't want one fine, but not hiring someone based on that is an invasion of privacy. Its kinda like someone who doesn't like dogs not hiring anyone who owns a dog. Seriously, wake up!
0 Votes
+ -
Good luck with that
GrumpyOldMan 23rd Feb 2011
@Goldie07 I hope you have an Amish comunity nearby to hire from. You're not going to find many employees otherwise.
@Goldie07

Good to know that every bad potential employee uses Facebook. Better yet, no decent potential employees use Facebook. Not exactly sure how you came to that conclusion, but your policy smacks of ignorance, and ripe for a lawsuit.
0 Votes
+ -
@Goldie07 That's a good way to get sued.
@Goldie07 Sounds like you hire nothing but mindless dolts. Bet you make a lot of money doing that. Or do you spend too much time changing your Depends to actually do any work yourself, so any fool will do? What business are you in? Own a hot dog stand in Peoria? A dry cleaner in Iowa? A toilet cleaning firm in East Podunk?
0 Votes
+ -
@Goldie07 That is a truly idiotic stance... so what if the potential candidate drives a car that you don't like, would you not consider them either? But I guess that is why you are not in a position to interview or hire people.
@Goldie07 I use my FB page just to keep up with friends & family. So I would lose a job because my family lives in other states? I hope someones sues you.
@Goldie07 Uhmmm... That's really stupid.
@Goldie07
. . . and beginning of lawsuit.
@Goldie07
I'm over 60 and have family and friends all over the country - we keep in touch and share photos via FB. It's nobody's business whether or not I have a FB account. It has no bearing on a job. Most companies today have clear policies on computer usage - that should be enough.
0 Votes
+ -
Not a Chance
Tim Patterson 23rd Feb 2011
Not only should you not give such information to an employer it should be illegal for your employer to even ask for it.

Part of the problem here is that citizen protections have not kept pace with the digital age. Of course the very employers which want to own your entire life also own our government. Don't expect any protection from your government now.
0 Votes
+ -
It's Aleady In Writing
MichP 23rd Feb 2011
The Facebook TOS (and most other sites with passwords, I'd imagine) already says "You will not share your password, (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account." End of that discussion.

I might offer to log in (when they're not looking) and let them look at my friends list on the spot instead, or accept a friend request from THEIR account (with the understanding I could unfriend after starting work. Inappropriateness/questionable wisdom of friending your boss and all that).
@Tim Patterson I agree. This would be the same, in my mind, to them asking to search your house. I think anything they can get publically about your Facebook (or any other social media) is fair game but this is over the line.
Where I work, they pull your credit information before even getting an interview. I don't know how it's used but I think that is a bit too much. They can somehow do that without your consent. I would imagine it wouldn't be too long before they can get the Facebook information without your consent.
The excuse that they want to check for gang related activity is a hollow one. I suspect a majority of gang members don't have a facebook account. With the philosophy this business has, they are probably more likely to hire a gang member as I'm sure no facebook would be equivalent to a clean facebook.
0 Votes
+ -
What citizen protections?
sissy sue 23rd Feb 2011
@Tim Patterson

I agree with you. Employees have already knuckled under and surrendered their rights to a private life away from work. And, there is no doubt that Government and Big Business are working together to make you a slave.

Every time Government wants something done, it looks towards the employer to put the screws to the employees, since it doesn't have the gonads or the honesty to confront us itself. During WW2, employers collected fingerprints from their employees. During the Cold War, they obliged Government by forcing employees to take Oaths of Loyalty. In recent years, they've used technology to spy out whether employees are doing something on their own time that Government doesn't approve of.

When are Americans going to find THEIR gonads and resist these intrusions? Do we have to have "employers demand our house keys" or V-chip us before we do?
0 Votes
+ -
I dont have a FB account but I wouldnt hand it over if I did and I would end the interview at that point. Also, unless youre a masochist, working for a company who asks for any of your personal passwords would not be a dream job, it would not even be a good job. They would be micromanagers who do not believe in trust or empowerment. Your basic theory X management nightmare of a work environment.
Facebook account, Twitter account, e-mail address, they're all private to the user who owns them and no one has the right to be forced to take over the account. It is acceptable to put in terms and conditions that prevent users posting details on Facebook, just like they would e-mail though.
0 Votes
+ -
may be the employer wants the keys of my house
yaque Updated - 23rd Feb 2011
to come to family and friends gatherings in order to evaluate all of my family and friends?
Using that rationale, it would be wise to do the same viceversa: ask for the facebook password/house keys of the employer (CEO, owner, director?) in order to avoid working with a potentially dangerous corporation/institution.
@yaque
In my case that would be Barack Obama! No Facebook, no Twitter, etc. See no reason to give up such if I did have.
0 Votes
+ -
Security clearance
sboverie 23rd Feb 2011
@yaque
The NSA does check with friends and nieghbors if you are trying to get access to government classified information as part of your job. Private business needs only enough background checks to make sure you are who you say you are and that your references and job histories check out.
0 Votes
+ -
@sboverie@... I have a friend who works for the FBI and had to be vetted for his job - and I was contacted prior to his getting the job and asked some questions. He was not required to disclose his facebook status (i.e. having or not having a FB account) or his login credentials.
0 Votes
+ -
Security clearance
KerrieG 7th Mar
But that is different than you average run of the mill employer.
0 Votes
+ -
Absolutely not!
Will Farrell 23rd Feb 2011
because onec out of you hands who knows who has that password?

Imagine your boss screwing something up so bad that he's going to get fired, so he just logs onto your facebook page and creates a post "from you" admittting it was you who screwed up?
@Will Farrell
Give it to them, then change after a couple of weeks or you get hired or turned down?
0 Votes
+ -
boycott facebook!
bmeacham98@... 23rd Feb 2011
... because of privacy concerns and concerns like those raised in this article
0 Votes
+ -
@bmeacham98@... How is this the fault of Facebook? This particular bit of idiocy came from the Maryland State Government Department of Corrections. Perhaps you might want to read the articles you post on in the future to avoid looking uninformed.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix