Why is Microsoft really hitting down hard on IE6?

By | March 10, 2011, 12:39pm PST

Summary: Microsoft has had enough with the IE6 browser and wants users to migrate to newer versions. Or, is it just washing its hands of a flaw-filled browser?

If Microsoft is serious about users upgrading from its out of date, insecure Internet Explorer 6 browser in older versions of Windows, it should also promote other browsers to accelerate its demise.

The company is getting desperate and has resulted in reverse marketing its own predicted death of the browser, by drawing attention to it.

Frankly, the fact that Internet Explorer 6 still has a 12% browser share, it makes Microsoft look bad compared to these younger, better looking and more advanced browsers like Chrome and Firefox.

(I bet at least 1 in 3 members of the Generation X reading this article just spat out their coffee in fury).

But there is a solution to get there quicker, Microsoft, but you might not like it.

Mary Jo Foley reported that many businesses are stuck with the browser for the way web applications interact with it. Another theory is the rise of piracy in developing centers of the world, which are using pirated copies of Windows XP even still, and has the browser set as default in the outdated operating system.

If businesses can’t afford to upgrade, and pirate copy holders are too poor to buy a genuine copy of Windows, it adds to Microsoft’s sticky situation.

If the company was so serious about this objective, it would promote other browsers - just as it was forced to do by European regulators which questioned the dominance of Microsoft’s pre-installed browser.

But it isn’t.

Naturally it wants to hold onto its browser marketshare for all of its most recent browsers, Internet Explorer 7 through to the new soon-to-be released Internet Explorer 9.

But I am not all that convinced Microsoft is entirely focused on its seemingly sole objective of having “a less than 1% usage worldwide”. The security flaws alone keep Microsoft in the counter-threat business by forcing it to plug the holes in its own software.

It was only last month I was so enraged by the fact that nearly a billion people were affected by one flaw which had the potential to wreak havoc across the entire planet, I quit using any version of Internet Explorer altogether.

I strongly suspect that if Microsoft’s IE6 reaches a global browser marketshare of less than 1%, it can effectively wash its hands of a browser which at first gave it the much needed worldwide boost over rivals, but has now dragged it through the negative press bureau and sullied its initial victory to a point of no return. 

Is Microsoft washing its hands of the browser in the right or wrong way?

Related content:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
48
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

goog
mikehussy36 30th Apr
Its a good article! Really you have shared some useful information over the post. thank you so much.
Toyota Starlet GT | Nissan vanette for sale | Toyota Prado For Sale
0 Votes
+ -
Lazy IT admins are also to blame. If they really cared about security they would push to move away to newer browsers (IE or otherwise)
0 Votes
+ -
@antonio_tirado@... "Lazy IT admins are also to blame. If they really cared about security they would push to move away to newer browsers (IE or otherwise)"
What do you expect the IT admins to do about this? Remember that the article said that many organizations (read large organizations) still use IE6 because they have web applications that will only run on it. Do you really expect, for example, city/county governments to undertake large and costly upgrades of their existing web apps in these times of shrinking budgets? Not likely.
@tacticsbaby

Yes! If they understood how much they could lose through a security breach they would do the upgrades immediately. It is up to the IT admins to educate management as to the risks.
0 Votes
+ -
@jorjitop
"Yes! If they understood how much they could lose through a security breach they would do the upgrades immediately. It is up to the IT admins to educate management as to the risks"
sure that people must be stupid, they don't understand that they just need to throw a few more millions to redo all they web infrastructure, developed under the premise "all the way, all Microsoft ", too bad the foundation was rotten, no problem, just they need to understand that they were wrong to be trapped by MS technologies.
@tacticsbaby

They can pay now and control their costs, OR they can go bankrupt when they get hacked and have uncontrollable costs.
That's what happens when you get stuck with one monopolistic vendor. Back when IE6 was released, there really weren't a whole lot of alternatives out there and M$ was pleased with all this. They had their captive audience already with .NET and all.

Now it's bitten them back on the bum and they can't get rid of it. They get what they deserve.
@tacticsbaby
ABSOLUTELY! The excuse (a poor one, at that)is self-defeating since it has been known for a very long time that IE6 would be phased out completely! One would think that 15 years would provide sufficient time to engineer a workaround at the least or a outright replacement being ideal.

City/county governments lease their software/hardware packages. Few own their equipment outright. Hardware doesn't last forever and neither does software. Leases can be structured to ease the financial burden up front. With city and county governments being on short financial leashes as tacticsbaby suggests, it may be time for them to change vendors.
0 Votes
+ -
@antonio_tirado@...
Rubbish. Most of them are locked due to stupid web developers who developed their wares to MS standards and not open standards. This is why open standards are the best thing for all.
IE4, 5, 6 developers == stupidity (or maybe it was their managers)
IE 6 is only ten years old now and three versions behind. It's a crime that Microsoft isn't going to support it for a quarter century. happy
0 Votes
+ -
@Tiggster
IE6 is 4 years old, considering that XP/IE6 was the flagship OS/browser combo they were selling until recently, when they started shipping Win7.
0 Votes
+ -
News Flash!
Wolfie2K3 12th Mar 2011
@theo_durcan
Microsoft released Windows XP in 2001. The browser it came with was IE 6. This is 2011. Do the math...

Did you completely forget about Windows Vista? That was released in 2007. It came with IE 7. (Yeah, yeah.. I know. Who remembers Vista... Blah blah blah...)

Windows 7 arrived in October 2009 with IE 8. And now we're getting IE 9.
0 Votes
+ -
Disagree
rahbm 11th Mar 2011
@Tiggster
"It's a crime that Microsoft isn't going to support it for a quarter century."

No, the crime was MS bringing out this bloated, incompatible browser in the first place!
0 Votes
+ -
@rahbm
Microsoft is a crime
@rahbm Stupid comments do not support your argument. Before complaining about 'bloated, incompatible' software, remember that some IT personnel think they know more about the software than its creator. The tweaks they make may not turn problematic for weeks or months - even years, depending on how often new software is introduced into the system environment. Not every IT guy is as sharp as you...or as sharp as you think you are.
0 Votes
+ -
You're over-reacting there
Will Farrell 10th Mar 2011
It was only last month I was so enraged

OK. To most others it was just a different browser with a different problem. Big Deal.

I strongly suspect that if [Microsoft] (IE6?) reaches a global browser marketshare of less than 1%, it can effectively wash its hands of a browser which at first gave it the much needed worldwide boost over rivals, but has now dragged it through the negative press bureau and sullied its initial victory to a point of no return.

Was that a mistype?

If the company was so serious about this objective, it would promote other browsers

Right, just as Apple does with it's platforms. And who's browser does Google push to everyone? So sayin that if they were "so serious about this objective, it would promote other browsers" is idiotic at best.

I'm serious about ending global conflict, but I won't sacrafice my family and freinds lives to that end. Hello, same thought process!!

I think on this day, you aren't really talking from a logical starting point.
0 Votes
+ -
@Will Farrell Agreed!
0 Votes
+ -
@Will Farrell Agreed!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why is Microsoft really hitting down hard on IE6?
illegaloperation Updated - 10th Mar 2011
"Another theory is the rise of piracy in developing centers of the world, which are using pirated copies of Windows XP even still, and has the browser set as default in the outdated operating system."

So what? Internet Explorer 8 installs fine on pirated copies of Windows XP.

"Mary Jo Foley reported that many businesses are stuck with the browser for the way web applications interact with it."

So what? Enterprise can use UniBrows so that those legacy applications for IE6 can run on IE8.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@day2die Yes, but for a long time it required genuine validation.
0 Votes
+ -
"Another theory is the rise of piracy in developing centers of the world, which are using pirated copies of Windows XP even still, and has the browser set as default in the outdated operating system."

I wish more bloggers would see XP as such. Many on here still think XP can be used to preform measurable analysis, and still think XP can be used to judge Microsoft by.
0 Votes
+ -
Running IE6 on XP is a pleasure. it's light and fast. All website I've surfed rendered well in IE6. I do not have to click the compatability view button on IE7/8. Firefox is slow and memory hungry. And I don't want my private data sent to Google via Chrome.
0 Votes
+ -
@UseYourHead

Facepalm.
0 Votes
+ -
Totally agree; words fail me too!
rahbm 11th Mar 2011
@Cylon Centurion 0005
Very hard to believe, but I think we've found someone even dumber than Loverock!
0 Votes
+ -
@UseYourHead Use your brain, not your head.
@UseYourHead Hey if your so worried about Google getting information. Then why do you use IE6 with so many security problems? Your reasoning does not make sense.
@UseYourHead

Running IE9 on Windows 7 is a pleasure. It's light and fast. All websites I've surfed to render well in IE9. Some of them don't render well in IE6, as IE6 does not support the latest web standards. IE6 is slow and memory hungry.
@UseYourHead
> I don't want my private data sent to Google via Chrome.
With IE6 your credit card numbers are automatically sent to a pimply Bulgarian teenager.
0 Votes
+ -
@UseYourHead
Using your head is fine - as long as it's not to hammer nails into stuff...
0 Votes
+ -
LOL!
John Zern 13th Mar 2011
@Wolfie2K3
I liked that.
IE 6, and this is somehow Microsoft's fault? Then again, you think other people should pay for your college education, too, so I shouldn't be surprised.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes it is MS fault
wackoae Updated - 10th Mar 2011
@frgough@... MS was the one who created the beast, and sold lots of services that would only work with the beast.

So they are to blame at least by 50%. The other 50% goes to the idiots who purchased the bastardized services.
can force you to buy their product.
@frgough@... I fix computers and anyone who does will tell you people are lazy, they don't upgrade, update, or do anything to help themselves stay safe. But then they blame the OS manufacture for thier problems. Go figure!
0 Votes
+ -
2000Pro Can't Upgrade IE6
PreachJohn Updated - 10th Mar 2011
As I've posted before, MS wants IE6 use to cease. So they say.
Yet, for those lesser resource computers that sport 2000Pro as the OS, and have all the computing ability they need with it, MS won't allow an upgrade to even IE7.
Seems illogical for MS to do, and it needs to be known.
I'd be glad to get rid of IE6 on a couple of my machines. Up to date Firefox works fine on 2000Pro. Why not a newer IE?
0 Votes
+ -
Edit Does Not Work Forever!
PreachJohn 10th Mar 2011
When will ZDNet fix their EDIT feature that is perennially broken?
Because I care about spelling, syntax I need to Edit my post on occasion.
I click Edit and get a Spam judgment. I've been 'reported as Spam'. Nothing changes when I click Edit again. After a few tries, it worked.
Ever since the poorly executed revision, it's been this way.
I remember that ye posted some useful, itemized thoughts on this so very long ago.
Why does ZDNet not listen?
@PreachJohn

"When will ZDNet fix their EDIT feature that is perennially broken?"

Probably never. From what I can tell, they prefer not to fix their website.

Surprisingly enough, they actually don't practice what they preach - many of them preach frequent updates, but amazingly they don't actually practice it on their web pages.

The ZDNet website is a prime example of doing the exact opposite of everything they preach as good practices.

Yet another reason IMO that ZDNet is more entertainment than actual tech news.
0 Votes
+ -
@PreachJohn
Why no preview button?
Other forums (that I post comments on) have a preview button.
0 Votes
+ -
The simple fix for Edit...
Wolfie2K3 12th Mar 2011
@PreachJohn
Hit the refresh button (F5) and then try editing.
0 Votes
+ -
Simple reason...
Wolfie2K3 12th Mar 2011
@PreachJohn
Windows 2000 is deemed obsolete. It is no longer supported.

To put forth yet another stupid car analogy, Seat belts were not mandatory equipement in cars prior to 1968 in the US. Most people nowadays agree that seat belts save lives more often than not. Would it be a reasonable demand that seat belts be retrofitted by the car maker into every single car still on the road made prior to 1967?

It would have put them out of business. The same goes for every saftey innovation since - air bags, antilock brakes, traction control, etc.. etc.. etc...

In much the same way, it costs Microsoft money to keep people working on operating systems that are currently no longer supported.

The problem lies in the fact that in order to get IE 7 or later to work on Windows 2000, it would require more than a simple replacement of the HTML engine and dropping in a new browser. There are other concerns involved - likely having to do with the same reasons why Windows 2000 isn't designed to be a gaming platform. Win 2K was designed to be a business platform. It wasn't until Windows XP that the business and consumer platforms merged into one codebase.

Firefox, Safari and Chrome are different mainly because they aren't tied into the operating system. They are self contained apps that don't rely on all the plumbing underneath like the IE family of browsers.
It should be glaringly obvious why MS wants it dead. Microsoft is tired of the technologically illiterate of the world blaming them for all of the insecurities of a product that they replaced three times. If people were to upgrade, they'd find themselves with fewer security and performance problems. Same thing applies to all of the people complain about Windows XP SP2 not being good enough. Microsoft has gotten better about updating its products, but the average computer user doesn't bother to implement them, and Microsoft gets the blame.
0 Votes
+ -
They should promote a modern browser
jscott418 11th Mar 2011
Microsoft should start by saying use a modern up to date browser! Anyone will do, just pick one and stop using a out of date browser like IE6.
"If the company was so serious about this objective, it would promote other browsers"

Which would accomplish what? Microsoft already has IE8 and the upcoming IE9. Why would promoting Firefox help them any more than promoting their existing browsers?
0 Votes
+ -
Better question:
Wolfie2K3 Updated - 12th Mar 2011
@CobraA1
What would be the point of promoting Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Opera?

The problem - as Zach himself stated - was that there are people out there who are stuck with web apps that were built around IE 6's quirks. Seems to me that Opera, Safari, Firefox and Chrome will still have the same problems - they aren't compatible with IE 6's quirks any more than IE 7, 8 or 9...
If Microsoft would get off their "we know what's best for you" and allow customizing the "tool bar" so it does not take 1/3 of the screen a lot more people would upgrade.
0 Votes
+ -
why can't they...
toubib2@... 11th Mar 2011
why can't they make a stripped down ie7or8or9 browser for the simpletons who have a win2k laptop they still use ...why not? It could be a nice little simple browser without bells/whistles and might even be good for some phones eventually when windows 7 phones come out (not windows mobile)...?? I remember when I got my first windowsCE1 device which amazed me with all the capabilities in such a diminutive space ...I could never understand why nobody made a dual boot laptop/notebook with windowsCE/PocketPC/WindowsMobile as the instant on and windows7 booting in background seemlessly if needed... I would buy that!
0 Votes
+ -
Why not?
Third of Five 12th Mar 2011
@toubib2@... Because unfortunately, they no longer support Windows 2000, and they don't really get money from people who still use it. Thus, they see it as not being worth the effort (from a cost-benefit* perspective).

*I should point out that they are thinking solely of their own benefit here.
@Wolfie2K3 "Microsoft released Windows XP in 2001. The browser it came with was IE 6. This is 2011. Do the math... "

That's weird, when I bought my last shrink-wrapped copy of XP in early 2008 it had IE6 as the default browser. I wonder why they would include an 7 year old browser in a stamped-in-2008 copy of their operating system?
0 Votes
+ -
goog
mikehussy36 30th Apr
Its a good article! Really you have shared some useful information over the post. thank you so much.
Toyota Starlet GT | Nissan vanette for sale | Toyota Prado For Sale

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix