ie8 fix
madison

Are you a pro- "Open Internet?" Libertarian or Republican? Better read this

By | February 7, 2006, 9:35pm PST

Summary:   I try not to get overly political on these pages, but I feel the need to make an exception here. Reading my colleague Anne Broache’s excellent coverage of Tuesday’s net neutrality hearings before the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee, it is plain to see that those Committee Members who would prohibit broadband Internet service providers from imposing [...]

senatecommercecommitteelogo.jpg 

I try not to get overly political on these pages, but I feel the need to make an exception here.

Reading my colleague Anne Broache’s excellent coverage of Tuesday’s net neutrality hearings before the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee, it is plain to see that those Committee Members who would prohibit broadband Internet service providers from imposing fees on bandwidth intensive services like, say, Google or Vonage are likely to be Democrats.

And those Committee Members who defend the practice or see no need for laws to prohibit it tend to be Republicans.

Senator Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) said that he would introduce a bill that "will make sure all information (transmitted over broadband networks) is made available on the same terms so that no bit is better than another one."

Senator Byron Dorgan (D-North Dakota), added that "it is not a free lunch… (broadband subscribers have) already paid the monthly toll.. Those lines and that access is being paid for by the consumer."

But Senator John Ensign (R-Nevada) worried aloud that compelling Internet service providers to carry high-bandwidth content without some sort of compensation for this load might wind up with these apps (taking) "all of their bandwidth."

And Senator George Allen (R-Virginia) doesn’t see the need for such a law because no broadband Internet Service Provider has actually tried to impose such a fee yet.

"The point now is, right now we don’t have a problem," Sen. Allen said. "Do you pass a law retroactively to try to put the genie back in the bottle?"

Well, I say yes, without such a law you will have "a problem." Big telecom and big cable never met a fee they didn’t like. And if they can impose those fees, then by golly, they will. 

And to those readers who don’t want these fees but don’t vote for Senators and Congressmen who will block those fees from being imposed - are you still as sure of your vote as you were before? 

Same if you are a Libertarian who doesn’t believe these laws are necessary. Do you really trust the telecoms and big cable to leave your Internet- our Internet, alone?

I know I don’t. 

Oh, one more thing. For video of this hearing, click here. The high-speed broadband feed is free - for now, or up until the fee-mongers succeed.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Disclosure

Russell Shaw

http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?page_id=1879

Biography

Russell Shaw

Russell Shaw passed away in March 2008. He was an enterprise computing journalist, analyst and author based in Portland, Oregon. A specialist in open source architectures and strategies, Microsoft applications, wireless networking, and multimedia content creation, Russell covered these fields regularly for several IT, business and consumer publications, including Investor's Business Daily and the syndicated IT news site NewsFactor.com.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

It was the Bush FCC that helped Vonage
george_ou 7th Feb 2006
Michael Powell of the Bush administration in the FCC backed up Vonage when their packets were being discriminated against. I don't think you should generalize so much on this one particular issue. The votes haven't been counted yet and it's best not to have the Government get involved unless this becomes a live issue.
0 Votes
+ -
Good Points
PoFigster 7th Feb 2006
You make some good points, but in all reality, you're blowing it a little out of proportion. You call for all libertarian/republican/conservative voters to change their vote because of one issue? People who vote based on one issue are irresponsible voters because there's a whole package that comes along with it. Further more, the republicans aren't (as far as I understand anyway) advocating a law allowing it - so even if broadband networks impose such a fee (as I understand they would love to), there's nothing preventing congress from enacting a law at a future point. And, because the internet technically falls under inter-state commerce, individual states can still inact laws that prevent such fees. This isn't an end-of-the-world situation yet. I really think your getting a little extreme. And yes, I am a pro-"Open Internet" Conservative.
0 Votes
+ -
Michael Powell of the Bush administration in the FCC backed up Vonage when their packets were being discriminated against. I don't think you should generalize so much on this one particular issue. The votes haven't been counted yet and it's best not to have the Government get involved unless this becomes a live issue.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix