Apple complaint quashed over 'misleading' Siri advert

Summary: Apple escaped trouble after the UK advertising authority found the iPhone maker was not in breach of standards, after a user complained Siri couldn't do what they had expected.

The UK's advertising authority has ruled that Apple did not breach any advertising standards by misleading consumers, after one person complained that Siri did not seemingly live up to their expectations.

Vodafone, along with other UK networks that offer the latest iteration of the smartphone with the virtual assistant, the iPhone 4S, said in the Apple-supplied advertising that Siri can:

"...help you send messages, set reminders or search for information. It understands not only what you say but also what you mean, so you can speak naturally. It can even use information from your iPhone — such as your location, contacts and contact relationships — to provide intelligent, personal assistance."

But the UK's Advertising Standards Agency found that Siri could not direct users to businesses or provide traffic mapping data, because such functionality is only available in the United States. Herein lies the problem.

But the complaint was not upheld, because the case hinged on a minor footnoted caveat. Apple covered its golden ratio-infused arse by stating as a footnote at the bottom of the advert: "Siri may not be available in all languages or in all areas, and features may vary by area."

The advertising authority, however, pointed the finger of blame apparently at the iPhone users themselves. The assessment noted that Apple has not made it explicitly clear that maps and location-based functionality would not be available in the UK. It did note that Siri displayed the local weather perfectly well, and was not as though Siri couldn't determine where its master was.

It also said that consumers "may have had prior knowledge of what Siri was reportedly able to do in the U.S.", and concluded that --- in not so many words --- that the average consumer would not have cared for the feature, and that the not-so-average user shouldn't have been so fixated on the technology reporting scene.

The ASA, however, put it in a far nicer way:

"However we did not consider that these consumers represented the average consumer in the UK and, because the ad in itself had not explicitly or implicitly made such claims, we concluded that the ad was not misleading."

Well, that settles that then.

Image source: Vodafone/Apple. Article via The Register.

Related:

Topic: Apple

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

8 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • So they want a specific disclaimer?

    One that specifically says what exact features are not available in every part of the world? That is ridiculous. This is one I will side with Apple on. It is not uncommon for features of products to vary by region and I would be willing to bet that there is some factor outside of Apple's control prohibiting the feature(s) that they are complaining about from not working.
    bobiroc
  • Sigh. And to think that not so long ago,

    these petty little whiners used to control an empire where the sun never set...
    baggins_z
    • before I follow with a derogatory comment...

      would you mind telling me where you hail from?
      12312332123
  • They should have just said...

    Apple's disclaimer should have just said, "Siri might not damn work at all!" That would have pretty much covered everything!
    slickjim
    • Or even better yet....

      "Siri damn well doesn't work at all!"
      Seriously, we once again have been offered a 'new' feature, which Apple has 'invented', that is 'magical' and far more advanced than anything anyone else has. Not that I don't appreciate the effort, but in all seriousness it doesn't work AT all. I have already heard a LIVE demonstration of Siri on national radio, which simply failed. Just yesterday I heard an anecdote from someone else on radio about how you can hear people floating around airports, fruitlessly trying to get Siri to make an appointment for them, repeating, rephrasing and even arguing with their phones!

      Not once has it saved its hapless fan from embarassment. Its so comical its not even funny....
      12312332123
  • Doesn't this say the carrier ran the ad?

    [ul][i]Vodafone, along with other UK networks that offer the latest iteration of the smartphone with the virtual assistant, the iPhone 4S, said in the Apple-supplied advertising that Siri can:[/i][/ul]Am I reading this right? Vodaphone took a template ad supplied by Apple and failed to tailor it for the UK market? Whose fault was that? Don't the carriers in every country have to make little tweaks to conform with local laws and customs? What, did Vodaphone list the price in US Dollars. too?
    Robert Hahn
  • User expectation is not the same as misleading

    So now any company is expected to write a disclaimer for every expectation the user makes up?

    I read the ads posted here (assuming they are part of the case) and NONE of the are claiming anything even remotely close to what the ONE person complained about.

    So how is something never claimed by a company "misleading" ???
    wackoae
    • And what about that backwards Cadillac?

      Have you seen that ad with a snowboarding pickup truck? The disclaimer at the bottom says something like, "Totally Photoshopped dramatization. Do not attempt." These days, if you don't do that, the lawyers will be crawling on you by sundown.
      Robert Hahn