ie8 fix

Apple files EU antitrust complaint over Motorola patents

By | February 19, 2012, 3:43pm PST

Summary: Apple has asked European antitrust regulators to settle a dispute over patents. A formal antitrust investigation could be looming over Motorola.

Only a week since Motorola was given the go-ahead by the European competition authorities to be acquired by Google for $12.5 billion, its sister authority for antitrust matters has been asked by Apple to look into Motorola Mobility for abuse of its patent position.

Apple sent a letter to the European Commission accusing Motorola of violating a promise to licence essential industry-standard patents on fair and reasonable terms.

Also known as FRAND terms, it requires companies with patents to license them out under conditions which do not harm competition, or could be seen as extortionate or too expensive for rival firms.

It was discovered in Motorola’s annual report, a 10-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As the letter was received by Motorola on Friday, it shows that the company only just heard about it.

Explained at the end of page 37:

“On February 17, 2012, the Company received a letter from the European Commission, Competition Directorate-General, (the “Commission”) notifying it that the Commission has received a complaint against Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“MMI”) by Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) regarding the enforcement of MMI’s standards-essential patents against Apple allegedly in breach of MMI’s FRAND commitments.

Apple’s complaint seeks the Commission’s intervention with respect to standards-essential patents.”

As sister site CNET nicely puts it: “Apple wants to be left alone.”

Apple and Motorola have been engaging with tit-for-tat patent battles for months. Apple has, however, found luck in seeking the help from authorities in relation to its patent disputes. Samsung is already under investigation by European authorities for its handling of patent licensing. If Apple succeeds a second time, Motorola could face a formal antitrust investigation.

The European Commission, which oversees competition and antitrust matters across 27 European member states, can fine companies up to 10 percent of its global annual turnover should it be found to be flaunting Europe’s rules.

Image source: Ashleigh Ozment/Flickr

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit. Details of which are restricted, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from the Huffington Post, Business Insider, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

I have to side with Apple on some of those issues.
Letophoro 25th Feb
It's Apple's phone and they can determine what is or is not allowed to run on those phones. At least until the owners of the devices choose to jailbreak their phones.

As far as most of Apple's suits, they boil down to software implementations which I believe should not be patented nor should they be patentable. If patents are granted, they should be applicable only to the Apple branded phones.
So is Apple finally ready to license the patents that it has been using in the iPhones? If I remember correctly, Apple had previously complained that it was unable to license the technology(ies) to make phones from Motorola at the same rates that others had paid, and so just used the patented tech without actually bothering to license same.

Or is it that Apple is simply reiterating that its use of the patents in the future is fair because they are already using the patents in current products?
0 Votes
+ -
@Letophoro

You seem to miss understand the position.

If I wish to make a smartphone it doesn't have to be a touch screen thats the fashion, where apples patents are (I'll leave validity alone) and aren't covered by FRAND or monopolies legislation

If you wish to make a 3G (industry standard) phone you have to license patents from motorola and thats covered under FRAND and monopolies legislation

Bottom line Motorola, Apple or any other company have to license patents relating to industry standards due to FRAND
0 Votes
+ -
That's what I was pointing out.
Letophoro 25th Feb
Apple used the patents without paying because they claim that Motorola was charging them more than others who actually licensed the technologies used in the industry standards.
@Letophoro So who will file an EU anti-trust complaint about Apple, not allowing any other browser "engine" than internal one... or why Safari is bundled by default...

And if Apple needs to be left alone, why does it consistently files court suits against all its competitors around the world...

Apple's cry like "Leave Britney Alone!!" , nothing more...
It's Apple's phone and they can determine what is or is not allowed to run on those phones. At least until the owners of the devices choose to jailbreak their phones.

As far as most of Apple's suits, they boil down to software implementations which I believe should not be patented nor should they be patentable. If patents are granted, they should be applicable only to the Apple branded phones.
If apple was concerned about being left alone, they'd keep their trap shut, mind their own business and go make some new products instead of just updating the same old thing and expect no one to make a similar product after 5 years. New as in BRAND NEW not new as is updated graphics and shape. What I just don't get is why has no one brought up anti-trust lawsuits against apple? You can't run OSX unless you buy an actual mac, regardless if its the same hardware as a $800 windows computer. Essentially it is a *nix OS and linux runs just fine on both platforms. You can run windows on a Mac but you cant run OSX on a Windows pc with the exact same hardware (UEFI only realistically). Apple got a version of our Office and a few of our Apps while we got itunes and quicktime. You cant really do anything about backup/syncing your idevice without itunes. Apple stole Wifi Sync from Greg Hughes and the pull down status bar from android but they complain about our slide to unlock. You cant buy a new case for you iphone without fear of them being shutdown/sued out of business by apple immediately. Apple made the iphone 5 years ago then a bigger version that the UI still just doesn't feel or look right. For apple to even go after phone manufacturers is just plain stupidity. These companies make hundred if not thousands of products and here we are with apple and 6 products. Several of which are just bigger versions on their cousins (touch's became ipads without cdma, iphones became ones ipads with cdma). The list really keeps going. Apple throwing around lawsuits like TP at a frat party and so far mac users opinions of apple in our city have dropped in the last year. They still like the products just not the company behind them now. Luke, the Koolaid is strong with this one...
0 Votes
+ -
Curious here. You speak for an entire city?
James Quinn Updated - 20th Feb
@Nate_K ... What is this cities population and what kind of area are we talking about? I mean I can cover Waterville, ME from start to finish in a short walk. Some cities however cover many miles and have hundred if not millions of people... Heck even in Waterville, ME as small as it is has a lot of people I don't know or talk to so I could not talk for the city/town of Waterville. Which brings me to my last question. How many people in this city of yours did you actually talk to about this subject? Seriously I want too know:)

Pagan jim
@Nate_K

My goodness: "our Office," "our Apps," "our slide to unlock."

Taking this all rather personally, aren't we?

By the way, look up "standards essential patent", and "free, reasonable and non-discriminatory."
What you really mean is that some of Apple's money has found its way into certain legal figures hands over in Europe.
0 Votes
+ -
@Peter Perry ...I'll make something up entirely" trick. yeah seen it done before. However to be fair I want you to show any and all evidence you have to support such a claim and if it be fact based I will of course apologize for my error. Will you do the same if you have nothing to prove me statement wrong?

Pagan jim
@Peter Perry

If you've found proof of a crime, you should pass it on to the authorities.

Bribing of foreign officials is actually a Federal crime: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (FCPA) (15 U.S.C. ???? 78dd-1). Many US firms have run afoul of this law, from Lockheed to Chiquita. Currently News Corp may find itself in US legal hot water over it's eavesdropping scandal, in which British officials were reportedly bribed.

Let us know what results from your reporting of this crime.
To ensure wide acceptance, interoperability, reasonable cost etc.. Everyone including consumers win when FRAND is honored.. Moto and Samsung are messing things up by abusing these terms that they agreed to hounor and have gained a lot from already.. They need to put back in their place.. Apple's patents it is protecting are not part of standards so they don't reap the benefits and are not restricted by the obligations... They are trying to have their cake and eating it too.. as well they are trying to double dip.. license to chip makers and then license to Apple on top of that which of course is not allowed under patent law... It's called parent exhaustion.. If it wasn't there Moto could also sue all of us for using the tech as well..

Bottom line.. These guys are weak and desperate... now they are getting investigated for anti-trust.. Add not too smart to list...

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix