Why you can't post London Olympics photos, videos online

Why you can't post London Olympics photos, videos online

Summary: Taking a photo of your favourite athlete at this year's Olympics could land you in trouble. But Olympic organisers said that enforcing social media rules is impossible.


Despite the upcoming 2012 London Olympics dubbed the first "social" games, the organisers have imposed heavy restrictions on what spectators and athletes can do with the photos and videos they take.

Olympic-goers are barred from uploading photos and videos of the events on social networking sites, not limited to Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. As if that wasn't crazy enough in this day and age, "branding police" will ensure that non-Olympic logos and trademarks will be covered in and around Olympic venues.

As the Guardian notes, athletes will not even be able to tweet which brand-named cereal they are eating that particular morning. Send in the troops should Sir Chris Hoy tweet about his epic bowl of Weetabix.

But Olympic bosses have admitted the ban on spectators posting content is "unenforceable", claiming there is "not much [the organisers] can do about it."

The rules are so strict, in a bid to protect contracts signed to generate vast sums of sponsorship money for the Games, that athletes are not allowed to have their photos taken next to branded products that are not official sponsors of the Games. Even Twitter is disallowing non-official sponsors advertising with promoted ads under Olympic trademarks, such as #London2012.

The Olympic tickets state:

"Images, video and sound recordings of the Games taken by a Ticket Holder cannot be used for any purpose other than for private and domestic purposes and a Ticket Holder may not license, broadcast or publish video and/or sound recordings, including on social networking websites and the Internet more generally."

The reason is due to the brand laws passed in the UK not too long ago in preparation for the upcoming Games. The Olympic Symbol (Protection) Act 1995, and in particular the London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act 2006, both protect the Games from abuses and those who wish to cash in despite not holding official sponsorship accreditation.

The London 2012 Organising Committee (LOCOG) said that a "common sense approach" however would be enacted to ensure that especially those in the commercial sector frankly don't push their luck.

"Media rights are sold --- can we police everything these days? Absolutely not," Sir Keith Mills, deputy chairman of LOCOG told the BBC.

"The internet has changed the world and we're not going to be silly. But the reality is that we live in an Internet world where Facebook downloads and uploads are happening every day of the week and there's not much we can do about it."

"We are looking to stop people who seek to use them for commercial purposes," a London 2012 spokesperson said. A clarification will be issued as and when the tickets are distributed, they said.

Image credit: CNET UK.


Topic: Social Enterprise

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Weetabix?

    you have to be kidding.
    William Farrel
  • Who's hosting these Olympics?

    The British or the Nazis? Doesn't seem to be much difference.
  • This is Absurd

    Their is going to be a huge amount of pics & vids posted on Social Networking sites within minutes of the official start of the games. This is impossible to enforce & will become a huge negative thing the Olympic Committee has to deal with. Can't wait for the first enforcement attempt to be filmed & posted on the web for all to see.....
  • Errr....

    This is the same as going to most sports and concert events which say no camera at all, but they do allow small digital cameras.
    Basically it's saying that keep it to yourself - but if it goes out to others make sure it's not for profit reasons [i.e. Burger King can't use the London Games's logo in advertising if they don't have the rights to.]
  • idiot

    most of the comments may as well say, "Hello, I'm a typical zdnet commentor that hasn't read the entire article, but posts some typical idiotic bigot response to the headline. Probably because I am a reactionary jerk. "

    Please, read the flipping article before making yourself look like a genuine retard.

    > "We are looking to stop people who seek to use them for commercial purposes," a London 2012 spokesperson said. A clarification will be issued as and when the tickets are distributed, they said.

    uploading a snap of the awesome stadium or Olympic park to your facebook wall does not constitute commercial purposes. Please remove the tinfoil hat.