Google due for a fall? Donna Bogatin debates Danny Sullivan

Google due for a fall? Donna Bogatin debates Danny Sullivan

Summary: The Great Google Debate: Donna Bogatin vs. Danny Sullivan

TOPICS: Google


Fast Company Magazine invited "two experts" to take sides:
Donna Bogatin and Danny Sullivan


Bogatin: Google's search stallion has driven GOOG to a 400%-plus appreciation in just two years. Google's stock price is not sustainable long term, and neither is its domination in search.

Advertisers will not stay blinded by Google indefinitely and users will seek more comprehensive search results, elsewhere.

Sullivan: The proof is in the results. Google's results are as good or better than the competition. Good is also good enough. If the results are good enough-- and they are--people won't seek alternatives.

Bogatin: Google's ambitions are unrealizable, but dangerous. People may "trust Google" now, but "Google 2084" is close at hand.

Google has dibs on our email, office correspondence, financial spreadsheets, health records…and wants to hoard it all, "forever." The vaunted Google "search utility" will know more about us than we will know about ourselves!

Sullivan: If the scaremongering or pessimism is true, then Google's plenty valuable. Having so much data opens up huge possibilities for commercial products and services.

Google could do more to address concerns. But we really need laws to better protect our search privacy and other data. Despite its power, Google can't provide those laws.

Bogatin: The "millions" of businesses and individuals "voluntarily" forking over their proprietary content and personal data to Google "every day," sell themselves and their assets short, while Google's market cap balloons.

Sullivan: Google's the lifeblood of many sites, sending them huge amounts of traffic at no cost. Google's an Internet billboard company, a pretty efficient one. 

Bogatin: Google tells Wall Street it can find "new ways to monetize all the time," claiming no "obvious ceiling" to growth, its share price says otherwise, however.

In 2007, GOOG will be negatively impacted by a continued decline in the growth rate of Google's earnings per share. Analysts forecast a 36% growth in EPS for Google in 2007 ($12.63), versus its 78% rate in 2006 and a 172% rate in 2005. As Google's earnings growth slows, its share price to earnings ratio will also fall; GOOG's 2006 PE of 50 is likely to dip to 36 in 2007. A GOOG 2007 fair value of $454 (36 PE X $12.63 EPS) is below its 2006 closing price.

Bottom Google line? Search for a better investment opportunity in 2007.

It was fun! Read the full Fast Company Magazine great Google debate:
Donna Bogatin vs. Danny Sullivan

Topic: Google

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • the next real innovation will not come from google...

    If you want to see real innovation coming, don?t look to the big dogs. It?s not that they can?t do it technically, or lack the imagination. They simply have too much riding on the (near) status quo. It will be more than the quality of the results that will shift usage. New and better ways to interact will be the next wave. I think something like what has put together is a good example of improving the user experience.
    steve haar
  • AAAHHHH Come on !!!!!!!!!

    Man, you really HATE Google !!!

    I really don't think Google is the most evil corporation outthere.

    I don't see the point in keeping the attacks, your facts keep getting slimmer. So really, give it up.

    Google IS a corporation, and they make quite a lot of money delivering great services to a mature and knowing market.