Google OS? Why Microsoft STILL rules

Google OS? Why Microsoft STILL rules

Summary: Upon the announcement of Google Gears, I underscored: Google: Tough love for Microsoft.Why?


Upon the announcement of Google Gears, I underscored: Google: Tough love for Microsoft.

Why? Google “owns” the Web experience, but to “improve” it, Google must go through the Microsoft-owned desktop, as I analyzed in Google’s love hate relationship with the desktop.

Does it gall CEO Schmidt to have to “Microsoft-enable” Google products? OR, does he get personal satisfaction in “using” Microsoft to achieve his Microsoft domination end-game.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, even if Google Gears is eventually fully realized, Google will not by default own anything particular, at the particular expense of Microsoft.

Google Gears is not ready for prime time and there is no way to know when, or if, it ever will be, especially in terms of consumer use. In the meantime, no company in the game will be standing still, Microsoft or any other player. No one can predict what the landscape will look like one year from now.

In any event, the Google Gears kills Microsoft stance is fundamentally flawed.

Michael Arrington trots out such a Microsoft is doomed thanks to Google argument, in defense of a Google buys scenario.

Until last week it wasn’t clear exactly how Google would be competing with Microsoft’s dominance in the operating system and office space. But then Google introduced Google Gears…They’re bypassing the operating system (the browser is the new operating system) and their apps will now offer a real alternative to Outlook and Office. Small and medium sized businesses will no longer have just one real choice when loading (and paying for) software on their PCs. And when you combine all that stuff with Salesforce’s CRM apps and developer platform, Microsoft has a real problem. The future of software delivery is the browser.

Of course in the Google Cloud future vs. the Microsoft Desktop legacy battle, Google has a vested interest in pushing for the “future of software delivery is the browser.“ BUT, the browser is still accessed via the desktop, the laptop…which are run by operating systems. Usually, those operating systems are supplied by Microsoft.

Small and medium businesses today, and for the foreseeable future, will have the same (lack of) choice “when loading (and paying for) software on their PCs.” The operating system is often pre-loaded and it is typically a Microsoft OS.

Google will have an even harder time ruling the enterprise.

I spent this morning at the NYC Googleplex listening to the Google Apps Premiere pitch and heard the Google Enterprise pitch at the Enterprise Search conference last month.

Consumer-driven Google does not get the enterprise and it is unlikely that it will get meaningful enterprise customer business.

As I wrote Friday:

Microsoft dazed, confused and gasping for air? Google wishes. What big bad Google innovation is there that has escaped Microsoft?

Google is the undisputed leader in search and search advertising, for now. BUT the search game is the only one Google is winning, despite its endless efforts to diversify.

SEE: Google Office wins? Declares enterprise hierarchies ‘dead’ Do Google Apps really trump Nintendo Wii and Apple TV? Is Google Enterprise Search a joke?  Google to big business: Google love belongs in the Enterprise!

Topics: Microsoft, Google, Operating Systems

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I think the OS + apps will win

    Google Gears with the Palm Foleo is the only way I see it as a replacement for OS + apps.

    However with Tablet and Origami devices coming in and being very inexpensive, I think the OS + apps will win.
    • RE: Google OS? Why Microsoft STILL rules

      It's safe to say that Palm Foleo wasn't the answer. The coming herd of android devices and related web-based services might pan out though.
  • A black and white world?

    Is there nobody can simply fathom that Google will not "crush" Microsoft and Microsoft will not "crush" Google but, instead, Microsoft and Google will co-exist and be behemoths together? They are apples and oranges. Google provides hosted software solutions with, now, the ability to take those apps "offline" when needed. Microsoft provides an OS and software. So where Google is competing is in the software space, not the OS space. Also, Google has been in the "hosted software" service for a few years? Microsoft has been at it for 30 years.

    It makes no sense to compare the two. The only comparison that could be drawn is that Microsoft had plenty of chances along the way to take the hosted application space, and they tried several times. Google was wise or lucky enough to succeed where Microsoft has failed. However, Google is NOT trying to create an OS. They are leaving this to Microsoft, Apple, and the makers of the various Linux distributions. Likewise, Microsoft shouldn't bother with search and should leave this up to Google and Yahoo.