April deadlines loom for Windows XP, Office 2003 product support
Summary: Next month marks the deadlines for support -- in some cases, free support, in other cases, paid -- for a handful of older Microsoft Windows and Office products.
Next month marks the deadlines for support -- in some cases, free support, in other cases, paid -- for a handful of older Microsoft Windows and Office products.
Microsoft is ending mainstream (free) support for Windows XP Home and Professional, as well as for its Office 2003 suite, on April 14, 2009. It also is "retiring" Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1), meaning it will no longer provide support for that four-year-old release.
Microsoft is offering paid, extended support for XP Professional users (who also have Software Assurance licensing contracts) until April 8, 2014. It also will provide paid, extended support for Office 2003 through August 4, 2012.
(Microsoft continues to provide free security-specific fixes to customers for its products, even if they don't pony up for "Extended Hotfix" support until the extended support date is reached.)
In case you're wondering about support deadlines for other Windows and Office products, here are a few of the key ones.
(Note: I've done my best to try to calculate some of the more cryptically-worded deadlines here; if you see any mistakes, let me know.):
Windows 2000: Free support ended June 30, 2005; paid support ends on July 13, 2010. Service Pack 3 was retired on June 30, 2005. No more SPs planned.
Windows XP SP2: Service pack will be retired on July 13, 2010.
Windows XP SP3: Service pack due to be retired two years after SP4 (if there is one) releases or in April 2014, whichever comes first.
Windows Vista Business: Free support ends on April 10, 2012; paid support ends on April 11, 2017.
Windows Vista SP1: Service pack will be retired two years after the release of SP2 (which is expected in April 2009), so likely in April 2011 (?). Office 2003 SP3: Service pack will be retired one year after SP4 (if there is one, which is doubtful) is released or in August 2014, whichever comes first.
Office 2007: Free support ends on April 10, 2012; paid support ends on April 11, 2017.
Office 2007 SP1: Service pack will be retired a year after SP2 debuts, so likely in April 2010 (?).
Windows Server 2008: Free support ends September 7, 2013; paid support ends October 7, 2018.
April is also the rumored due date for the final Vista SP2 and Office 2007 SP2 updates. The support clock starts ticking on those once they are released to manufacturing.
Among the new features slated for Office 2007 SP2 are previously announced file-format changes — specifically support for Open Document Format (ODF), Microsoft’s own XML Paper Specfication (XPS) and PDF. SP2 also is expected add improvements to Outlook calendaring reliability and improved Outlook performance overall; improvements to Excel’s charting mechanism; the ability for Visio to export UML models to an XML file compliant with the XMI standard; and an uninstall tool for Office client service packs.
Vista SP2 is anticipated to include a new capability for recording data on to Blu-Ray media natively in Windows Vista; the addition of Windows Connect Now for simpler wifi configuration; fixes for DRM issues from WMP upgrades; the Vista Feature Pack for Wireless; functionality for reducing resources required for sidebar gadgets; and more.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Message has been deleted.
Exactly what I was thinking
One item is staggering.
http://www.amazon.com/Acer-AOA150-1447-8-9-Inch-Processor-Sapphire/dp/B001EYV9TM/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1238011504&sr=8-1
[I]Acer Aspire One AOA150-1447 8.9-Inch Netbook (1.6 GHz Intel Atom N270 Processor, 1 GB RAM, 160 GB Hard Drive, [B]XP Home[/B], 6 Cell Battery) Sapphire Blue[/I]
That's why I said that MS didn't respect consumers originally when XP Home was offered (bite the bullet, MAKE Vista work) and now at the backend, non savvy customers will be hosed again.
It speaks volumes that post April 2009, when support is over, it will still be the "recommended OS" for netbooks.
TripleII
You seem to forget one blantantly obvious point...
One PC... OR ANY PC.
The manufacturers are the ones that CHOOSE to
put XP Home onto a PC.
Don't blame Microsoft for this, it is
DEFINITELY NOT their doing.
not exatly
Makes you want to pay that $500 premium for an Apple, doesn't it?
Microsoft doesn't support the OEM version anyway
Microsoft will continue to release patches for security issues for XP for several years and kudos for to them for that service.
I ask you, when was the last time you called Microsoft for help with XP? For the vast majority of you, the answer is "never". The end of mainstream support for XP will come and go, and almost no one will even notice.
Definitively true!..
So.. who cares?
I remember calling MS Support once with an issue in a sound driver that did not work after SP2 was installed. With their assistance I was able to repair it. That has been the only time I ever called them. So as long as necessary security fixes are distributed, I don't care what the support status is.
No problem, those users can always install Linux and enjoy
I think this is very good.
LOL
Linux Option....
Problem with Linux Apostles
1) Which of the several hundred Linux distros should you select for the enterprise/
2) Where do you find the money for training on the new OS?
3) All the squawking about "Linux on the desktop!! Linux on the desktop!!" instead of doing the deployment they were contracted to do.
problems with your argument
2) Old argument. Vista is different enough than XP that it will require more training for enough workers to push the cost up higher than a switch to Linux, especially one of the easier to use distros for new users.
3) If someone doesn't do the job, fire that person and bring in someone else who will. Stop complaining about the actions of others and start doing something about it.
RE:Problem with Linux Apostles
Assuming that the company has done their due diligence re:cost/benefit studies and have decided to move some or all of their IT to Linux, there are at least a half dozen very suitable candidates.
>>>...2) Where do you find the money for training on the new OS?...<<<
Two things to keep in mind here are that (1) Any company wide training costs are a one time expense and (2) Savings on per desktop licensing and reduced need for technical support will allow the enterprise to not only cover the cost of training but to also save on support staff. It takes a lot less manpower to keep Linux running smoothly.
Linux makes me appreciate Windows
I was always so critical of Windows until I met Linux. Tarballs, glibs, gstreamers, stange errors and thousands of other codes to run for a simple things like playing a DVD.
Not my experience with Ubuntu, I insert the DVD and watch it play
I tried that
Grrrrrr...
RE:Linux makes me appreciate Windows
This post clearly identifies the author as an idiot or a liar. Consider if the author believes what is posted. Undeniably an idiot. If the author knows it to be false, clearly a liar. The puzzle is which? Does stating the obvious fall in the realm of "personal attack"
Don't be so sure. He is in the process of learning and
If using f.ex. Ubuntu or Suse and received instruction valid for Slackware, anyone in the process of learning Linux can get the hard way in, when there is a much easier way.
RE:Don't be so sure. He is in the process of learning and
Well, install Ubuntu, remove install disk, insert DVD, sit back, relax, and enjoy. What is so tough about that?