Forrester: Forget Macs. In business, it's still all about Windows
Summary: In spite of the continual noise around Macs gaining marketshare, Windows still totally and completely rules the enterprise roost.
In spite of the continual noise around Macs gaining marketshare, Windows still totally and completely rules the enterprise roost.
That's another of the findings of the Forrester Research report I cited earlier today -- "Enterprise Desktop And Web 2.0/SaaS Platform Trends, 2007.
Consumer love aside, Macs still just don't matter in the business world. From the report, released by Forrester on March 31:
"Enterprises’ share of Windows users dropped by nearly 4% during the year, but Microsoft’s monopoly remains undisputed: Some 95% of business users run Windows. While 2007 was a big year for Apple, with its enterprise share growing threefold to 4.2%, uptake remains limited to enthusiasts and small workgroups. IT departments crave standardization, and Macs pose too many problems for IT departments. The verdict for enterprise-focused vendors is clear: Unless your market is a niche business group, Windows is the only desktop you need support."
Before you ask, I already did: Did Microsoft fund or influence this study in some way? A company official told me plainly that "Forrester doesn't take vendor funding" for its work.
Next question: Does Forrester think Microsoft walks on water? What about Windows Vista -- a Harvard case study about which MUST be in the making? (Possible title: "Microsoft's Vista: How not to develop and market a product".)
For the record, Forrester is none too bullish about Vista's uptake in the enterprise, either:
"Adoption of Vista among Windows users increased by a little more than five percentage points during 2007 to end at 6.3%. But, much to Microsoft’s dismay, even this conservative growth cannot be attributed to upgrades from XP, which remained fixed at 90% throughout 2007. Upgrades are likely to have come from Windows 2000; its drop of six percentage points mirrored Vista’s growth. "
Microsoft is increasingly worrying about Apple in the consumer space. In fact, Microsoft is increasingly worrying about the consumer space, in general, which isn't too surprising since the Redmondians already have sewn up the enterprise and needs new markets to conquer in order to keep its growth rates up.
But in the enterprise, Apple isn't tops on Microsoft's list of companies to watch. IBM is. And given that the lion's share of Microsoft's revenues still comes from enterprise, not consumer, sales, I'd argue that Microsoft shouldn't let itself be distracted by all the noise around Apple's consumer market-share gains.
The part of this equation that is less cut-and-dried is the extent to which consumer success translates into business success. This is the reason that some Softies are increasingly worried about Apple's consumer laptop/notebook, cellphone and digital-music-player markets. Microsoft wants to emulate the Apple halo effect in the worst way.
However, more than one business user I know has said that s/he couldn't care less about which cell phones are popular among consumers. Instead, the focus should be on which cell phones work best in syncing up with Exchange Server and other corporate e-mail products/standards. And do warm and fuzzy feelings about an Xbox or a Zune really portend whether an IT buyer will gravitate toward Windows PCs, SharePoint Server or Microsoft-hosted CRM? Again, I'm not convinced….
What about you? Should Microsoft be worried about Apple's, Google's and other companies' consumer-market triumphs? Can the Redmondians afford to stick to their business knitting and just let the consumer chips fall where they may?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Canna get a big Duh ?
Market Niche?
Must be nice work to get, how do I sign up?
Have to be careful with "business" and "enterprise"
LARGE companies. Apple's best shot is
small companies that do not have or
want and IT dept. There are millions of
such companies. They really only need
an office suite, web and email.
For such companies, OSX is pretty
trouble free and is easy to manage.
As for "enterprise", I assume that the
research again focused on large
companies and government. In
colleges, a large "enterprise" market,
Macs are becoming far more common,
with some schools hitting almost 50-50
parity with Windows.
If Apple could make further inroads in
the 2 areas mentioned, their growth
would be enormous.
business and enterprise
the 2 areas mentioned, their growth
would be enormous
But it's not. We who are in small business could care less about what you fanboys get your rocks off by.
Mac Envy
well,
Well put
:D
Smart
http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html
I hope your not talking to me
wish granted
Now back to the point: The study reflects reality, not what reality should be. Any tech can and probably will tell you that it is possible to support ANYTHING in a mixed environment. That doesn't mean it's preferable to having a universal shop. If they have a use I'm all for supporting them, but if you're just going to say "well technically, with some hax, it CAN do this," well, that doesn't provide me with any unique benefits.
Since MS is established (and with good reason...they occasionally do something someone can us, you know) right now they represent the bright line standard for unique benefits.
Grammar police (?)
Oh boyyyy.... When one types in haste...
[i]Secondly, he replied to something which you quoted word for word with a smiley face.[/i]
So that's what really put you off, isn't it. Well I happened to agree with the sentiment and the way he put it, so I think it's my attitude you have a problem more than anything.
[i]I'm going to go out on a limb[/i]
You do that. And while we're on the subject, calling people trolls who don't agree with you isn't my idea of anything beyond the typical fanboy response. Just so you know.
[i]and say he wasn't talking to you, but you can think that if it makes you feel better.[/i]
Totally irrelevant. But I think you already know that.
If I was
Feel free to have a problem. I like Macs, I don't like supporting a mixed environment. You didn't say anything about that, so that makes you as much of a troll as him. In case you missed the big letters this whole article was about Mac at the enterprise level. Whether they exist is a matter of fact, not conjecture. People don't just make a study like this up. Address the issue.
Well maybe you shouldn't be wasting your time then..
You didn't like the attitude of my response, so you decided to become board policeman, wagging your finger at those who don't share your view, nitpicking at every "i" that isn't dotted, every "t" that isn't crossed.
If you consider me a troll, then by all means, please don't bother responding to me anymore. I'm still going to post in anyway I see fit, as long as it's under the guidelines of what ZDNet will allow. You have no control over that. I suggest you accept that.
From my research...
For 3 grand you get a server and an unlimited user Mail, group Calendar, Wiki, Podcasting, and unlimited Client Access licenses.
Microsoft's SBS will screw you over on the CAL's.
scary
I have 750 computers running windows in a medium sized business. How many small businesses would you say that amounts to?
Additionally, I'm in charge of technology for a hs. Do I want kids to have exposure to macs? Who wouldn'?. I don't want them totally clueless. Do I want to teach them a semester long computer apps class on a mac? Not on your life. I'd like them to be able to use two fingers when they grow up.
Our superintendent, who is essentially the ceo of a district in which I comprise onnley a fifth of the students and computers, agrees.
Let mac do what it does..one or two users in small shops, and stay the hell out of my school. Talk about your small business all you want, it would take 100 of them to brush the number of windows machines here and 530 to make up the number in the district. There's your market share. Macs are a pain to support in a mixed environment, period.
Why?
period." So, expand and tell us why...
I hear these statements all of the time and I am so curious
because I am a home user and only do "personal" IT for
very small businesses (all use Macs - but, don't let the fact
that they are my specialty delude you into thinking I don't
know pc's).
On a small scale Macs are a very viable alternative to
having an "IT" department (server easy, networking a cinch,
no need to hardly ever reboot, very user friendly, very hard
for the inept user to mess up... etc.) they are much more
affordable in the long run.
These continual statements only make me think that the
fault would be with a lazy IT department rather than a
problem to support - they need very little support, if any,
and they play very nicely with Windows networks - have for
a very long time.
Lazy IT
I am not arguing macs are worthless. What I will argue is that all our Mac labs served a specific purpose and by and large were setup and forget jobs. Any deployment, permission changes, and the like remained difficult. I don't doubt there is a Linux solution or two you can use to hack it together, but then instead of one os I have 3. If you haven't done tech support for a medium or large business, I genuinely think you might not get it. In a large environment, unless you are specialized, you just dont have the time to toy with 3 OSs and the user support, interoperability, and substitution for "Standard" programs you have to do. In your environment, macs may be swell, in mine they simply introduce a new headache.
The plain facts are...
designers.
Serious video production...
Yes, Apple still has market share in design houses, but even those are shrinking. I've never heard of a design house switching form PCs to Macs, but I've heard plenty of the opposite lately.