ie8 fix

Microsoft confirms Silverlight 5 beta to ship in mid-April

By | April 5, 2011, 7:45am PDT

According to an April 4 post on the Silverlight Team Blog, Microsoft will be making a beta of Silverlight 5 available the week of April 11, concurrent with the Mix ‘11 conference.

The timing was widely expected, given that Microsoft officials said in December 2010 that the company planned to release a Silverlight 5 beta in the second calendar quarter of 2011. The final version of Silverlight 5 is due before the end of calendar 2011.

In December, Microsoft execs said Silverlight 5 would include 40 new features, the bulk of which are focused around making Silverlight a development platform for rich media and business applications.

The April 4 blog post — signed by Corporate Vice President Scott Guthrie, Corporate VP Walid Abu-Habdha and Senior Vice President Soma Somasegar — also notes that Microsoft plans to share more about its HTML5 tooling strategy in the near-term. From the post:

“While we have emphasized the role of HTML5 as the foundation of the recently released Internet Explorer 9 and have shown an unprecedented commitment to being leaders in HTML5 browsers, we have probably not emphasized enough the tooling for HTML5. We’re going to emphasize that much more going forward as the clarity of feedback and the emphasis our customers want us to place on these tools for the professional toolbox is clear. It would be fair to say to the degree we did not emphasize the above we made up for it in our emphasis in Silverlight as a runtime (and by extension XAML).”

The recently announced Expression Web Studio 4 Service Pack 1 and Visual Studio 2010 Service Pack 1 both include some additional HTML5 support. But it sounds like there will be even more HTML5 tooling coming from Microsoft, from what I’ve heard.

The rest of the Silverlight Team Blog post restates (yet again) Microsoft’s latest positioning around HTML5 and Silverlight. The post authors said that Microsoft isn’t favoring one technology over another and that there is room for both. Because the authors are affiliated with Microsoft’s Developer Division (the Silverlight champions), not Windows Client (the HTML5 champions), the understandable emphasis in the post is on the future of “plug ins” (i.e., Silverlight as a browser plug-in). From the post:

“Today, plug-ins and standards play complementary roles, and as a practical matter there is no single technology to satisfy all the needs demanded by client development. While much has been written about a diminishing gap between the capabilities of HTML5 and capabilities provided by plug-ins, plug-ins will continue to evolve and so there will likely be a gap of some degree, and it will cyclically contract and expand. Contraction occurs as the standard specification ‘catches up’ with the plug-in technologies, and then expands again as the next wave of innovation pushes the boundary further forward.”

I’ll be interested to see how much of the “Silverlight vs. HTML5″ positioning wars inside Microsoft actually make it into the Mix sessions and keynotes next week. One session that should be fun and interesting is Vertigo CEO Scott Stanfield’s “HTML5 for Skeptics.”

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

37
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft confirms Silverlight 5 beta to ship in mid-April
makrejktt4301-24353680030957331660113481566189 Updated - 10th Nov
Special Blog site service webblog I like typically the construct Detroit Lions Jerseys and tint option will it be green bay packers jerseys possibilities to obtain a fake nfl jersey inside of your concept?
This whole "HTML5 vs. Silverlight" thing is pretty ridiculous.

What I want to know is what's going on with WPF? Silverlight is already a top tier method for developing Windows Phone apps. Rumor has it that Silverlight is moving to the xBox and that it will be the basis for the Windows 8 app store as well. Where is WPF in all of this?
@Rich Miles

WPF is being leap-frogged by Silverlight, initially by MS creating a Silverlight control which can be embedded in WPF apps (so there's no need for server round tripping). Incidentally, I wouldn't expect to see a Silverlight control for WinForms. Instead, MS are going to force WPF down the necks of WinForms developers so you have to iterate twice.
0 Votes
+ -
WPF and Silverlight will eventually merge
honeymonster 5th Apr 2011
@Rich Miles

At this point in time the gap is narrowing. WPF still has more advanced 3D features, but SL is leading in other areas, such as event model. The two will eventually merge. The difference will become some minute (because SL is catching up) that MS will have a hard time justifying WPF just for high-end desktop specific apps.
0 Votes
+ -
WPF is not going away... it's being
cosuna Updated - 5th Apr 2011
@Rich Miles : Microsoft and the MSDN crowd (Developer Division) have a tendency to move things forward and then scale back when the market does not respond to them.

WPF is such a case. Being so heavily typecasted as a Vista development tool, MS had no choice but the "re-purpose" it, meaning they don't kill it, but they don't maintain it, just like what happened with Linq2Sql.

So, with that said, you can still develop in WPF but no new features are going to be added to it.

On the other hand, in Windows 8, everything "Metroy" or "Moshy" will look and smell like SL, be it Silverlight for Windows Embedded (C++), Silverlight for Immersive Shell (AppX) or Silverlight for Immersive Browser (Web).

Am sure those will be inside the "Windows App Store" and Microsoft will push for Win32, WinForms and WPF to be delivered only by the old way (msi installers), maybe even preventing them from working on anything akin to a tablet to avoid spoiling the "immersive" interface.
Questions:
1. Does Silverlight 5 mean more features for Windows Phone?
2. Would it be possible to have Silverlight "save as" HTML5 instead of a Silverlight binary? I realize there may be some lost features, but this seems like the best case alternative.
0 Votes
+ -
Not exactly the best analogy but you've got the picture. HTML5 is all empty talking at best. You cannot build anything fantastically interactive with it.
LBiege "HTML5 is all empty.....",

I have a hunch you also think IE9 was a mistake and wants your beloved IE8 back.
First: Silverlight might be the best, easiest technology since ever, my rant isn't about this tech. Its about corporations and people.
What made me angry was Microsoft actions. Before 2010 (IE9) it didn't care much for open standards. It pushed SL as kinda solve-all. It especially sold it as Flash killer (to this date SL fans insist of saying Flash/Silverlight). MS's line was: SL is supported on 99% of the world. Meaning Win and Macs. Fans bought this wholeheartedly and repeated this foolish lie, saying SL is cross-platform.
To make this long comment short, MS drones- ahm - developers, cared nothing about creating open solutions and shoved SL into public facing sites. sad
Anyway today i don't care. SL as flash-killer bombed. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Oh? so IE8 was not about standards
honeymonster 5th Apr 2011
@fanbaby

Even IE7 improved standards support. IE8 went a lot further, even to the point where MS did something they've never done before: broke backwards compatibility. Remember the "broken page" icon?

At the time of launch, IE6 was *much* more standards compliant than *any* other browser out there. Really. Firefox wasn't there. It was built later on the left-overs from Netscape which lost be browser wars because they believed that they could make their *own* standards. a "layer" tag, anyone?

Microsofts crime was to neglect the browser once they believed they had locked the market up. But saying that MS didn't care for web standards smells of hindsight. Yes, they lagged and dragged their feets, intentionally. But once they started with IE7 and IE8 they clearly moved in the right direction.
?While we have emphasized the role of HTML5 as the foundation of the recently released Internet Explorer 9 and have shown an unprecedented commitment to being leaders in HTML5 browsers, we have probably not emphasized enough the tooling for HTML5."

MEANING:

"oops, we were caught with our pants down, we didn't think people would care much for open-standards. Strange, the usual plan didn't work and for, and for the first time, no-one fell for SL. So now we love openness, please bare with us while we change course, and in the meantime have you seen how fast IE9 is?"

MS was dragged into HTML5 while the rest of the industry led the way.

PATHETIC (unless all you know is to how use VS2010)
0 Votes
+ -
Whatever, fanbaby
Will Farrell Updated - 5th Apr 2011
@fanbaby
Saying it doesn't make it true.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft confirms Silverlight 5 beta to ship in mid-April
Return_of_the_jedi Updated - 5th Apr 2011
@Will Farrell

You have way too much emotional stock invested in M$.
0 Votes
+ -
Return_of_the_jedi
Will Farrell 5th Apr 2011
@Return_of_the_jedi
You have way too much emotional stock invested in anti-MS.

Get a grip and grow up a bit.
0 Votes
+ -
@fanbaby

There is an element of truth in that but what MS says about the gap between plugins and standards contracting and expanding over time is also true. The main advantage of Silverlight as I see it is that MS can develop it such that Silverlight web apps running in IE on a Windows machine can hook into the operating system and leverage local resources more efficiently than a pure HTML5 app. Obviously this wouldn't be suitable for consumers due to variations in OS and browser choice, but it could be very beneficial for line of business applications.
0 Votes
+ -
OffsideInVancouver,
As long as you don't advocate shoving SL into public-facing sites (as some st---id devs did in some poor countries) I'm with ya.

As far as LOB apps, you can mire your clients as much as you want in SL, it's none of my business. I just feel sorry for your clients, that you pushed them there because you only know VS2010. Again it's none of my business.
0 Votes
+ -
@Fanbaby

I'm not a developer, I don't sell LOB apps, I have no vested interest in SL, Flash or HTML5 happy

My point is simply that with a browser, OS and application framework / runtime all made by the same company there is potential for them to work together much better than offerings from seperate companies (cue open standards debate, but that's another thread). This is no different to tools from the e.g. CA or BMC suite of products working better together.

As we and MS agree, it won't work on public facing sites or anything cross platform, but where you can guarantee homogenity across your userbase the potential is there for you to be able to do more than you would with HTML5.
@OffsideInVancouver

You know that SL work on OS X and work in other browsers besides IE. SL 5 functions suppose to be in moonlight for linux OS's.
"You know that SL work on OS X and work in other browsers besides IE. SL 5 functions suppose to be in moonlight for linux OS's."
stm24

You are repeating yesterday's marketing from MS. Today's message from MS is: SL as a flash killer is dead. It's not cross-platform enough (actually, i think it was never). Try to get a refund from MS for all your time and effort.
0 Votes
+ -
Choice limiting
symbolset 6th Apr 2011
@OffsideInVancouver SL doesn't work on ipads. IE 9 doesn't work on XP. Those choices limit the set of committed customers a small subset.
@symbolset
"SL doesn't work on ipads"

LOL, and whose fault is that? Maybe you should ask yourself who is blocking access to the iPad. Talk about being confused about who to blame...
0 Votes
+ -
But it is great news for hackers!
0 Votes
+ -
Silverlight is cool
xp-client 5th Apr 2011
Silverlight is one really good thing Microsoft is doing right now. It's the richest form of web experience, leaps and bounds over HTML5.
Anyone remember WMV and WMA ?

Silverlight is going to be flushed down the same toilet.
0 Votes
+ -
So it'll end up next to your brain?
Will Farrell 5th Apr 2011
@Alan Smithie
If you've proven to everyone here time after time it's that your brain was flushed down the toilet a loooong time ago!
LOL! happy
Will Farrell I disagree

He's (and mine) message is: WMV and SL have a lot in common. Both are proprietary Sh-t, and also late to the game. When the world is busy putting the Flash and Mpeg fires out, MS comes and starts new fire. sad

BTW if you invested time and effort on Silverlight or WMV, try to get a refund from MSFT
0 Votes
+ -
I agree, get a refund
Michael Alan Goff 6th Apr 2011
Or a job at a company that uses Silverlight.

One or the other.
0 Votes
+ -
@fanbaby,

Dude, get a freaking life. How many deragatory SL posts have you made so far? SL works fine for LOB apps that have been developed in WPF, where management wants to deliver the applications through a browser. There are a lot of .NET shops that would go this direction. Why all the hate?
0 Votes
+ -
bmonsterman, I DO NOT HATE SILVERLIGHT. IT'S A GREAT PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY. I HATE WHEN MS SOLD SILVERLIGHT AS A _web_ DEVELOPMENT TOOL. I HATE IT WHEN BANKS MAKE PUBLIC-FACING SILVERLIGHT SITES (because Microsoft encouraged them to). If you want to mire _your_ clients _intranet_ site with SL, go ahead i DON'T CARE. i only pity your clients when they'll rewrite everything in standard-based tech (for LOB that is most likely to be HTML4!, not even 5).
If MS were smart they will just make a "build to HTML5" option for XAML. Its not exactly hard to do (I'd be surprised if they're not working on it already". Therefore VS2010 Silverlight could deploy to EVERYTHING. Problems solved!
@ofoedu@...

This I agree with. I would love more than anything to see an option where we can output to HTML5.
0 Votes
+ -
So?
ComputerX 6th Apr 2011
I don't mean to be flippant, but really, who cares? All the MS staff I've spoken to recognise Silverlight is a bit of a joke. It has a small niche in Windows Mobile (for all their massive market share there...). The most exposure this'll ever get is in the Xbox. Everywhere else, people are looking at cross platform. Last time I checked, that puts Silverlight right at the bottom of "things to care about".
0 Votes
+ -
Visual Studio Lightswitch HTML5 Tooling
csgallagher@... 6th Apr 2011
Expression Suite applications need to become responsive to the needs of developers however Visual Studio Lightswitch is proving to be the basis for any competition with the current Cross-OS Development Frameworks which are rapidly becoming robust, reliable and refined application development generators very often obviating the need for a "developer."
@csgallagher@... didn't vb6 already obviated the need for "developers"
As a point of clarification, WPF and SL are both based on XAML. XAML is the real story here; that is the direction MS is taking things instead of WinForms and the win32 libraries. MS wants to position itself as the layer between the OS and the user. It sees the OS as taking an increasingly minimalized form, but developers still want a consistent, powerful, development environment and for that an abstraction layer is needed. That abstraction layer is .Net with a XAML interface. It may appears as SL, WPF, or some other technology (on xBox, etc.) but a .Net/XAML developer will quickly be able to pick it up and code with it.

Programming for WP7 is easier than any other device if you already program for Windows, which the bulk of the worlds programmers do (at least in part).
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft confirms Silverlight 5 beta to ship in mid-April
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 9th Oct
I appeal you sharing this weblog web page document.Several many thanks Once again. Carry on to maintain co football jersey mposing.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft confirms Silverlight 5 beta to ship in mid-April
tomlin21-24319035676893835085146735905770 11th Oct
Very good to get planning to your weblog when once more, it has been months for me. Appropriately nflshop this submitting that i've been waited for so intensive.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft confirms Silverlight 5 beta to ship in mid-April
makrejktt4301-24353680030957331660113481566189 Updated - 10th Nov
Special Blog site service webblog I like typically the construct Detroit Lions Jerseys and tint option will it be green bay packers jerseys possibilities to obtain a fake nfl jersey inside of your concept?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix