Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
Summary: Microsoft is moving full-steam ahead with its healthcare push, while Google may be pulling back -- and possibly pulling out all together -- from the electronic medical records space.
Microsoft is moving full-steam ahead with its healthcare push, while Google may be pulling back -- and possibly pulling out all together -- from the electronic medical records space.
Up until early March, Microsoft had been treating its Health Solutions Group as an "incubation," even though that group was staffing up and fielding a variety of cloud and on-premises health services and software. But on March 7, Microsoft moved the Health Solutions Group into the Microsoft Business Solutions organization headed by Corporate Vice President Kirill Tatarinov. (The analysts at Directions on Microsoft pointed out this organizational change, which a Microsoft spokesperson confirmed for me this week.)
Microsoft's HealthVault personal-health-record service, as well as the Amalga integration and analysis products are now in the same business unit as Dynamics CRM and Dynamics ERP products. Corporate Vice President Peter Neupert will remain the head of the Health Solutions unit, which will retain its own sales force and partner channel, Directions on Microsoft noted.
Google, for its part, seemingly is backing away from its Google Health initiative. The Wall Street Journal reported on March 26, in an article on Google's new priorities under Larry Page (who becomes CEO on April 4) that Google plans to provide "less support" to Google Health, going forward.
A March 27 research note posted by the Gerson Lehrman Group consultancy went a step further, stating that Google is dropping Google Health.
"Google Health being dropped is a setback for Electronic Medical Records (EMRS) in three ways: 1) Widespread adoption through cloud access; 2) Time-to-market and payback; and 3) Cross-industry collaboration," the Gerson Lehrman note said.
I asked Google officials whether the Gerson Lehrman note was accurate and what would happen to users' data if and when Google pulled out of the electronic health records space, and was told by a spokesperson that ""We don't comment on rumor or speculation."
Google Health competes head-to-head with Microsoft's HealthVault. Google Health, which Google had been developing since 2006, was released in beta form to consumers in 2008. Google Health is a personal health-records service. Google has signed up a number of health-provider partners as part of the initiative. There is nothing on the Google Health site that indicates that Google is phasing out the project, but there have been few (if any) updates to the Google Health site since last fall.
HealthVault also is a "personal health application platform," in Microsoft's words. Microsoft launched the beta of HealthVault in 2007 and went "live" with the HealthVault service in September 2009. In 2010, Microsoft launched a new HealthVault deliverable, known as HealthVault Community Connect, which is a SharePoint-based offering for managing medical-records-processing workflows, providing automation on the patient entry and discharge fronts.
In addition to HealthVault and Amalga, Microsoft also is offering identity- and access-management software for the healthcare industry via the Sentillion acquisition the company made in 2009. Microsoft also has a Healthcare Innovation Lab, and is working on introducing the Kinect sensor, the Surface multitouch table and Xbox technologies into its healthcare line-up.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Scary - MS has a poor security record
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
Poor security record? So your not confusing Windows PC's all over the world that get infected to Microsoft's ability to secure their network and infrastructure? Not sure I have heard of any data breaches of scale happening at Microsoft? I do hear about them from many other companies such as Google, but maybe I missed all the headlines?
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
Is MS Hosting this or making their inferior OS, and tools open to other companies to implement? #2 is a huge risk as few can protect against the inadequacies in MS software.
And even Microsoft can't secure their stuff:
http://www.itproportal.com/2010/12/24/microsoft-suffers-cloud-data-breach/
http://www.scmagazineus.com/microsoft-acknowledges-windows-live-id-breach/article/151544/
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
Not to say that it doesn't happen at Microsoft, but to say it only happens at Microsoft is very false. Google got breached and they ran off with proprietary code? Seems that stuff should be deep inside the network and very hard to get to, but not at the likes of Google. Every company no matter who they be will experience data breaches whether it on Linux, Unix, Mac, or Windows. If the hackers are determined enough and have the resources they will find a way in.
He's just a hater
He'll say anything as long as it's negative when it comes to MS, so take what he says or posts with a grain of salt, and a margarita to wash it down with. ;)
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
We don't trust you either
You shown us you know squat about what your talking about so i'm guessing your feelings on the subject matter carry no weight, and are of no importance to anyone.
You keep your money under the mattress if you want, but throw away your crayon and try using a pen for once!
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
LOL!
:)
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
Why is Google even in this space?
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
Just because Bing is smaller share than google, they aren't as interested in data mining? I would expect MS could be doing more aggressive data mining as they are growing impatient for more ad revenue out of it. Also of course, and a poor security track record. I'm sure even Health Vault contains legacy code as far back as DOS 1.0, which had no concept of security whatsoever. I will not trust MS at all with this in any way.
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
Really you think DOS code is in a non-operating system application that was created in the past few years? If you go look at Google compared to Microsoft you will find one major difference. The source of revenue is much different. Google revenue = advertising dollars. Microsoft revenue = actual software sales and many avenues of revenue through many business units. So after understanding that you can see who is reliant on the ad revenue!
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
I'm sure it does - same as how SQL2008 has many of the same vulnerabilities as SQL2000. Or how Win 7 has some of the same as XP. Or Office 2007 vs Office 2000.
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
Google cannot be trusted with medical records
Microsoft in Healthcare?
Seems like another missed opportunity by Microsoft to me.
Best done by smaller firms
It's just the way things are now.
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back
RE: Microsoft forges ahead in healthcare, while Google said to pull back