Microsoft preps StartKey: A 'Windows companion' on a USB stick
Summary: Microsoft has some big plans for the small-sized storage devices. Microsoft is working on turning USB-based flash drives into a "Windows companion" -- a new product known as "StartKey" -- that will allow users to carry their Windows and Windows Live settings with them.
Microsoft has some big plans for the small-sized storage devices.
Microsoft is working on turning USB-based flash drives into a "Windows companion" -- a new product known as "StartKey" -- that will allow users to carry their Windows and Windows Live settings with them.
StartKey isn't just for USB sticks; it also will work on other flash-storage devices, like SD memory cards. Microsoft is looking to turn these intelligent storage devices portable "computing companions" for users in both developed and emerging markets, with availability (at least in beta form) likely before the end of this year, according to sources who asked not to be named.
Microsoft's goal is to build an end-to-end StartKey environment -- comprised of everything from system software on the flash devices, a software development kit to enable third-party developers to create products that can leverage StartKey, and accompany Microsoft applications and services, sources said.
StartKey has its roots in an agreement Microsoft forged with SanDisk in May 2007. Microsoft announced it would be providing unspecified software to replace the U3 Smart Technology that was included on SanDisk flash devices. U3's technology enabled users to store files, applications and related settings on their USB sticks.
StartKey will make these flash devices more Windows-centric. StartKey devices will be customized to plug into Windows machines. They will allow users to bring everything from their desktop wallpaper, to their desktop icons, contact lists and data with them so that they can turn any PC or kiosk into their own, personalized workspaces.
Customers in developing nations are going to be a prime target for Microsoft with StartKey, my sources say. In these markets, StartKey becomes a way for Microsoft to reach billions of users in developing countries who might not have their own Windows PC at home, but who can get access to one at school or can log on via a shared Internet kiosk.
Microsoft has working with the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) team and various PC partners to test if and how Windows XP can run on Linux-based XO laptops. One of the favored solutions is to enable XP and other Microsoft software to run on an SD card that will be inside the XO.
When I asked Microsoft's Unlimited Potential team whether StartKey would be the way Microsoft delivers Windows on XO machines, a company spokesperson said there was "no connection." However, the spokesperson added: "As mentioned previously, Microsoft plans to publish formal design guidelines in the near future to help all flash-based device manufacturers design machines capable of a high-quality Windows experience."
(For those of you who, like me, are still wondering why XO users would want/need both Linux and Windows on these machines, here's the official response from the aforementioned spokeswoman: "Obviously, there would be a variety of reasons for governments and other purchasing bodies to choose XP--strong Windows ecosystem support, increased availability of educational software, and an strong connection to job and economic opportunity, among others.")
But back to StartKey. Microsoft has started talking up its StartKey vision among potential OEM partners. In the developed world, Microsoft is positioning StartKey as being securely and seamlessly integrated with Windows-based PCs and Windows Live services, I hear.
To me, StartKey sounds like an idea that might have gotten its start as part of a Microsoft Research project I heard about a year or so ago, codenamed "KeyChain." Here's Microsoft's description of how KeyChain would work:
"Tomorrow's mobile computing environment might see a proliferation of public-use (kiosk) machines where users can simply and easily call up their desktop environments. This vision offers an alternative to portable computing that doesn't require users to carry bulky, fragile, and theft-prone laptops. We posit that kiosk machines are capable of hosting users' desktops as virtual machines and propose a virtual disk design. The virtual disk design allows for an efficient access to per-user state held 'in the network.' We use flash-based disks to capture virtual machine memory state and to act as a cache for the virtual disk. We also allow static portions of the virtual disk, e.g., binaries for Windows and Office, to be served from the kiosk disk."
How much of Windows itself (if any) will be on the StartKey devices? When will they hit the market and how much will they cost? Will virtualization technology figure into the StartKey equation? I don't know. But I do know StartKey is in full-steam-ahead mode.
Do you think customers here and in emerging markets will bite?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
So it's OS on a stick ...
Its not an OS on a stick...
And by the way, in software development, nothing in original (well, almost nothing). Have you seen KDE 4.0 (or whatever the newest one is)? I would say its the linux community's attempt to emulate Windows and Macintosh.
RE: Its not an OS on a stick......
Yeah, I know
"Sounds more like a gimmick than a tool" Not really, If I can customize my workspace to be exactly how I like it, and not deal with the IT Admin who has a thing about desktop icons (I can't stand desktop icons) or one who won't let me run Firefox (Most Internet Cafes in Nigeria don't even know what that is).
Also, I want to apologize for the excessive parenthesis (probably an OCD thing).
RE: Yeah, I know...
The holy phial
Where won't you find Windows?
wow
Congrats, you're a real rebel.
"teh 9% of the world"
Rebellion is opposition to authority; Microsoft has no 'authority' over the world.
We're not 'rebels,' we're just not ignorant.
No, ignorants are a dying breed
Available right here, right now ...
http://portableapps.com/apps
So this is nothing new, plus it's even less desirable then a complete OS on a stick because you need a Windows OS as the host.
[i] I would say its the linux community's attempt to emulate Windows and Macintosh.[/i]
Just like OS X Leopard included virtual desktops that have been available to the Linux community since it's inception:
http://www.fvwm.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FVWM
Virtual desktops for X Windowing system was available since June, 1 1993. So how long did it take Apple to include this into OSX? ;)
Truly funny!
Trolling, again?
Dude, trolling isn't cool...
Sure Linux started off being a version of unix, but that doesn't mean it isn't innovative. Have you ever used a live CD?
Nah!
Have to completely agree with your innovation argument though: i've used PCLinuxOS and it performs great - without having to install! And in line with this subject, like DSL, it's another example of the innovation we've come to recognise and expect from the Linux community.
Regards.
Linux emulating Windows?
Konqueror, using it since 1999. 9 years ago it was miles ahead of Windows explorer. It is still the best file manager of any OS.
Virtual desktops, standard, since 1998 (which was my first foray into Linux, using them on Solaris since 1990).
One central configuration point (KDE control center) as opposed to 1100 gui-->subgui selections.
Thousands of themes, since forever.
1000x more customizable than Windows desktop.
Single click launch. (Why double click?). No Autoraise windows, focus follows mouse, click raise, no click raise. Windows click raise click focus drives me nuts.
Customize your Start Menu, add anything to right click on the desktop, Karumba...
One click task bar configuration, top-left-right-bottom, fonts, transparency, more widgets than you can imagine, 50% wide, 80% wide, autohide, transparency elements.
There is just too much to list. Vista finally looks almost as good as PCLinuxOS.
Now that KDE is integrating Beryle functionality (which BTW, Beryl does 1000x more than Vista) that existed long before Vista, including stealing superkarumba ideas from Linux, history is being rewritten?
I can't address OS-X, never owned any Apple computers, however, since it started as a BSD variant, I think it is safe to say that, oh, 3% of the Apple desktop existed and built on Open Source concepts?
Top it off, no keyboard highlight center mouse click copy/paste forever. Has either of them implemented this yet? Alt-C, CTRL-Y, etc, annoying.
TripleII
OH WOW!
[b]Virtual desktops, standard, since 1998 (which was my first foray into Linux, using them on Solaris since 1990).[/b]
Well, I tried the whole virtual desktop craze on Ubuntu, but didn't really see a need for it. After all, why should I switch from desktop to desktop rather than just minimize?
[b]One central configuration point (KDE control center) as opposed to 1100 gui-->subgui selections.
[/b]
Isn't this similar to control panel?
[b]Single click launch[/b] You can set Windows to do single click launch, too. I just don't use it becuase single click for me is to select something.
[b]Vista finally looks almost as good as PCLinuxOS. [/b]
Huh. I have only used the Gnome version of PCLinuxOS so thanks, I'll have to look into the KDE version.
[b]Now that KDE is integrating Beryle functionality (which BTW, Beryl does 1000x more than Vista) that existed long before Vista, including stealing superkarumba ideas from Linux, history is being rewritten?[/b]
Are you saying that high graphics existed long before vista? Isn't beryl a little too garish? What with all the graphical effects on it, its very distracting. But I am NOT extrapolating my POV to anyone else.
Don't take my posts as some anti-Linux rant. I love Sabayon but really, am I the only one who is noticing that Vista, Leopard and Beryl-Enabled distros are starting to look really similar? Besides, isn't it possible that two people have the same idea without copying each other? (See Newton and Leibniz)
Yes, I did make my post really long to match yours!
p.s. What distro do you use?
RE: OH WOW!...
Same here ...
Also with Compiz running and the cube or even the expo plug-in I can switch back and forth between a full screen virtual XP session and KDE with just a flick of the mouse or hot-key.
Virtual desktops with the expo plug-in is fantastic. Just set any corner as hot-key and bring the mouse to that corner to see all open applications and of the desktops at once.
I can move between multiple applications much faster then maximizing and minimizing each program. Use the show windows plug-in, set the other corner as hot-key and viola! Pick any application from the number of open application on just one desktop.
Once you use these little toys it's very hard to go back to a single desktop and try to juggle all of the clutter if you have a lot of applications open.
Just outlinging how KDE has led, not followed.
Why minimize. Open them across virtual desktops. 10 apps across 4 virtual desktops vs 10 apps on one desktop, it gets cluttered.
[B]Isn't this similar to control panel?[/B]
No, it's not. You launch into what, 40-60 subtasks, whereas KDE control center, all in one frame from that point on. Flip between Looka nd Feel to Mouse Config to Custom Sounds all in a single frame.
[B]You can set Windows to do single click launch, too. I just don't use it becuase single click for me is to select something.[/B]
If it is possible, where, I have never seen it (seriously, I would like to know). Can you stop that infernal automatic click raise or focus follows mouse?
[B]Gnome version of PCLinuxOS[/B]
http://www.tuxmachines.org/gallery/v/pclos93amm/desktop.jpg.html
This was the distro I started with. Gotta love synaptic, upgraded to latest version from beta (required manual repository reset). The above is the default desktop.
[B]Are you saying that high graphics existed long before vista? Isn't beryl a little too garish? [/B]
No, not at all, powerful graphics (games) is a windows strength. I am just comparing/contrasting Aero vs Beryl. I don't find Beryl garish,
http://www.tuxmachines.org/gallery/v/pclos2007/
but sometimes I turn it off. You can customize as much as you want on or off. I love burning window close and spinning desktop though. :D
Anyway, PCLinuxOS is my distro. Just my opinion, I don't like sudo or Gnome, and Kubuntu is not as polished/integrated as PCLinuxOS.
TripleII