Microsoft releases beta of Windows Home Server 'Vail'

By | April 26, 2010, 2:27pm PDT

Summary: Microsoft released for download on April 26 a public beta of the Windows Home Server ‘Vail’ release. Microsoft officials shared some high-level overview information about the Vail release, but very few specifics.

Microsoft released for download on April 26 a public beta of the Windows Home Server ‘Vail’ release.

In January, a Community Technology Preview (CTP) of Vail leaked to the Web. According to the description of that download, Vail, the next version of WHS built upon “both on-premises and cloud technologies” for home and SOHO (small office/home office) users.

Today, Microsoft officials shared some high-level overview information about the Vail release, but very few specifics.

Officials did confirm that Vail will be a 64-bit product only, according to a blog post on the Windows Home Server blog. Company officials said to expect Vail to include improvements “in four key areas,” including the extension of media streaming “outside the home or office”; improvements of multi-PC backup and restore; simplified setup and user experience; and expanded tools and customization capabilities for partners.

The beta is available in English only, and includes a new software development kit (SDK) who want to create add-in applications for Vail. Vail requires systems with a 1.4 GHz x64 processor, 1 GB RAM, and at least one160 GB hard drive. The product is expected to be sold preloaded on OEM/system builder PCs only.

According to one customer who has been dabbling with early builds of Vail, Vail will be built on top of Windows Server 2008 R2, and will support “transparent ‘virtual’ (remote) applications.”

“Windows Media Center currently does not support transmission of some protected content - for example HD premium content from a cable card - on remote systems, with the exception of xbox,” said the customer, who asked not to be named.

“That’s because the DRM chain gets broken by conventional streaming,” the source continued. “If you combine a trusted media chain in the server with a virtual app which can verify the integrity of the DRM chain on the client from the transport through to the display, then you can display protected content just as Xbox does. Then you can watch that high def football game in your hotel room, if you have the bandwidth. That’s pretty cloud-like. The same mechanism would support other cloud-style apps if they are enabled on the server. The combination of an untouchable virtual app and the ability to verify client side security capability is powerful - it gets around many thorny issues.”

Microsoft officials are not providing a final ship-date target, but I’ve heard it the product is likely to ship this calendar year.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

Talkback Most Recent of 48 Talkback(s)

  • All they had to do was mention DRM
    to make this product DOA as far as I'm concerned. There are so many things that technology could do to simplify our lives, but companies like Microsoft and the media cartels are doing everything they can to complicate our lives to protect their obsolete business models. I refuse to buy into that.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    terry flores
    26th Apr 2010
  • Apple, ect
    they all deal with DRM.

    In the case of an MS, I can see them having to work within the restrictions of DRM impossed by the RIAA, otherwise could they legally be allowed to distribute music without it?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    John Zern
    27th Apr 2010
  • RE: Microsoft releases beta of Windows Home Server 'Vail'
    Actually, even if you do enjoy tinkering with OS configurations, there's plenty to love with Windows and most of it without the command line.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    raimu koyo asu
    5th Jul
  • RE: Microsoft releases beta of Windows Home Server 'Vail'
    Linux server is not a viable option for the average home graphic from monitor of interior from design home videos that can you sport from any car corporate of high capability user.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    gogon gondrong
    20th Jul
  • RE: Microsoft releases beta of Windows Home Server 'Vail'
    @John Zern I will forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!
    Degree college degree post graduate degree
    ZDNet Gravatar
    disturbforce
    21st Sep
  • RE: Microsoft releases beta of Windows Home Server 'Vail'
    Microsoft releases beta of Windows Home about it is bank that website attacked from the site support from any soldier site to the light home page is great Server
    ZDNet Gravatar
    musdahi
    12th Oct
  • Why is MS wasting money on this rinky-dink product???
    What manufacturer in his right mind would use Windows on a
    home server when it requires x86, and brings along all of
    the security problems of Windows????
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    26th Apr 2010
  • Why are you wasting your time
    on these rinky-dink posts? I guess that confirms it: Windows home server is a threat to Linux somehow.

    Otherwise you wouldn't be here making your atypical posts.

    I've just setup a Windows Home Server for someone: $99.00 and it's running on an old P4, 2 gigs of ram, and does more out of the box for them then any Linux server I've seen. All so simple, they've mastered it in 15 minutes.

    For a small business this is perfect, supported, and easy to use. For the home with Media Server Extention, it's a great home media server, easy as pie.

    But then they could have allways gone with Linux and taken classes to learn how to run it, then used it on their old x86 machines to try and create the same thing, but you knew that already.

    What exactly is you're problem, guy?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    AllKnowingAllSeeing
    26th Apr 2010
  • If you look at the adoption of Windows Home Server, the adoption is about
    ZERO. Maybe a few Windows losers have installed
    it. So what?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    26th Apr 2010
  • I'll asume you aren't bright enough to even install this..
    But I have and it is a fantastic poduct. with 2 clicks I can back up any PC in the house and also access any and all files remotely, or give family memebers remote access to my pictures without exposing them to ad littered public sites that reduce the quality.

    Home Server is a fantastic product, but given the rest of the drivel you post here, I'm guessing you already knew that but just couldn't admit it.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    omdguy
    26th Apr 2010
  • Don't bother with him
    If it doesn't have "GOOGLE" written all over it, it's garbage.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Cylon Centurion
    26th Apr 2010
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    26th Apr 2010
  • You mean that hackers can access all of your personal files.
    With two clicks, you make all of the information
    on all of your computers available to the world.
    You sir are a complete idiot.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    26th Apr 2010
  • Pliney's rigtht, this IS a threat
    to you somehow.

    I Don't know why, but you seem to be the only one here who hasn't seen or tried it, but are complaining the loudest about it.

    It seems like MS is just starting to get the word out on this, and for the price (PTE's right: 99 dollars on TigerDirect) and it beats the pants off of Linux for a home media/backup server because the Connector CD installs and sets up the backup and file sharing for you.

    And there are all sorts of add-ins that you can get for it, so it's really a nice setup for Joe Sixpack.

    If you're worried about hooking to the internet, then don't! Now your totally safe!

    (But then again, with the way Apache's been hacked as of late, two clicks and you're in the same boat)

    So go down the list as to how and why a Linux server would be soooooo much easier and better suited for "Joe Sixpack", as opposed to WHS.
    Let me know where I can download and install a Linux server with all the functionality and ease of installation as this, and I'll look at it.

    And Yes, I've used WHS and think it's a great product for the price, I've even started setting other people up on it because of what it does.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    John Zern
    27th Apr 2010
  • ZDNet Gravatar
    DonnieBoy
    27th Apr 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources