Microsoft: The desktop PC isn't dead
Summary: The desktop PC is not dead; it's in the midst of a five- to ten-year-long makeover. So says Microsoft Chief Research and Strategy Officer Craig Mundie, who presented on February 26 to attendees of the Goldman Sachs Tech Investment Symposium.
The desktop PC is not dead; it's in the midst of a five- to ten-year-long makeover.
So says Microsoft Chief Research and Strategy Officer Craig Mundie, who presented on February 26 to attendees of the Goldman Sachs Tech Investment Symposium.
(At an investor conference, attendees typically look for tips on what a company has in the pipeline for the next few weeks or months. So Mundie's talk, which focused on his mission of looking three to 20 years out, was rather atypical.)
Mundie told symposium attendees that he believes there is a gap between the laptop and the mobile phone that will be fulfilled by any number of application-specific devices, such as e-book readers and educational Tablet PCs.
But there's also a place in the future for desktop PCs, although they won't look anything like the desktop PCs of today, Mundie predicted.
This is where future iterations of Microsoft's Surface multi-touch technology will come into play, Mundie said. Microsoft isn't looking at multi-touch as a technology only for tabletops, PCs and cellphones. It expects Surface-like computing systems to find their ways into desks, kitchen counters, and walls, too, over the next five to ten years.
(If you've ever been to Microsoft's Home of the Future exhibit on the Redmond campus, you've seen some of these form factors in mock-up form.)
Mundie said that Microsoft already knows how to make the Surface cheaper. (The first Surface devices, tabletops aimed at the hospitality and retail industries, cost tens of thousands of dollars per unit.) It was unclear from Mundie's remarks whether Windows will be what powers the future Surface devices; Surface 1.0 units are Windows-Vista-based.
"Our view is all surfaces will be Surfaces," Mundie said on Tuesday, during his 45-minute Goldman Sachs presentation.
Mundie joked that Microsoft's "anytime, anywhere and on any device" mission statement needed to be expanded to include "on anything."
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
They never were dead
Exactly
Well... we've had a google mail problem blogged about on here... Undersea cables cut....
People will *ALWAYS* want to keep critical data handy locally once they get burned with a service outage. Worst case, I can always eject my SD card and plug it into another PDA if my hardware dies. I'm in control.
Steve Jobs should take note also. He thought slapping safari onto an ipod = productive computer. Well just like in the 1980's when he thought computers didn't need to be able to display colors (contrary to all common sense at the time), he's wrong now as evidenced by the loud cries to get the iPOD Touch SDK available.
Local computing will never die.
Hence SilverLight is Gearing Up in the AIR
Ironically, its success lies in the Offline World.
That's why I think Microsoft developed SilverLight to compete with Adobe. First to tackle Flash, but now with AIR recently launched, the battlezone includes offline (or local computing) territory.
Their main competitor, both for Adobe but especially for Microsoft is Google of course. And Google's offline strategy is quite cunning and veiled.
Since how much attention is Google Gears getting? It's hardly mentioned in the AIR/SilverLight discussion, because Gears doesn't focus on the visual interface, but on making online apps available offline.
Google's first offline stop: Gmail and Reader. What's next?
Agree. It never will.
Tomorrow's cross-platform desktop ...
???Our view is all surfaces will be Surfaces,???
MSFT Surface technology...
Xbox, WM, Spot, Zune, etc.
This company has a reverse-midas touch. Virtually everything it
develops is junk.
Yeah, MSFT keep betting on the desktop as it dies further. There
is a great strategy for growth, just like Vista, WM, Spot, Zune, etc.
What a crew of misfits from the monkey on down.
Okaay...
Xbox: A failure? Uhh... mmmkay.... It has the PS3 beat down to a pulp currently. Wii is popular as well, but caters to a different audience.
Zune: I'll give you that. The iPod is #1 there. and will be hard to dethrone, at least in the near future.
WM: It's just a media player, and there are craploads of those available. There are several major players, one of which is WM, so calling it a failure is grossly inaccurate.
"What a crew of misfits from the monkey on down."
Translation: We have not been able to kill the desktop PC
compliant....... but we're working hard on
it folks... hang in there.... and keep
sending Microsoft your money. Victory is in
the "Cloud"!
Is the "Desktop PC" an MS product?
But I might be delusional. Who knows
It is in Ole man's world.
Don't worry..........
by those higher in the "Cloud".
Functionality is relevant, and Microsoft's
aim is to make it as relevant to Microsoft
as possible.
In case that went over your head too, it
means...... Microsoft aims to make
everything functional only with Microsoft's
permission..... otherwise it will not
function..... it will be relevant to
Microsoft and nothing but Microsoft.... get
it now?
LOL
Penelope and Rupert think this a spiffing way to go.
Trouble will be that all the computer literate are elsewhere, and MS can't even get that one line of code to work without crashing.
The idea of the end of the PC (ie sitting down to interact with a nice sized screen) is absolute rubbish - unless they think they'll be killing off (cutting of the air supply to) developers not in Redmond, which I'm sure they'd work on with some bio-corporation given half a chance.
"Suspicious sulphur leaks getting you down? Finding it hard to breathe? Microsoft air - now available in flip top bottles."
Nothing new
I would disagree
than desktops. I know a lot of people who have a laptop as their main machine.
They are either professionals who need the mobility and have some sort of docking
station when working at home, students who need the mobility to lug their laptops
around campus and even people who do not need the mobility just need one
computer and end up getting a laptop.
I think that is because people need the portability over size. The student and
business user need the mobility offered by a laptop and the business is not
prepared to get a separate desktop to lower costs and most students can't afford
both a laptop and a desktop. Other people probably just enjoy its convenience of
being able to use the computer anyway in the home and the option is there of
being portable if they need it and most of those users probably aren't big computer
users so screen size is not a big issue and are not willing to pay for a desktop and a
laptop.
Personally, I have both. I like my laptop on the move and my desktop when at
home. I guess I am in the minority though. I am quite a big computer user so to
me it is worth it. If I wasn't or I could only afford one computer I would definitely
buy the laptop over the desktop any day.
I am making a lot of generalizations here and people here will probably disagree
with me because they are most likely geeks of some kind (that is not an insult by
the way). Although, I do believe for the everyday person who is not big on
technology are increasingly moving towards laptops and that as their main
machine.
RE: Microsoft: The desktop PC isn't dead
1. Enthusiasts. Going back to the heath kits of the 50's, this group played a big part in developing PCs and will continue to push limits. They want full control; they want to mod; they want to push.
2. Gamers. We'll probably never see the day when a slim device produces the output desired by this group. Speed, power, heat, size!
3. Crunchers. There is immense computing power at work for the in-home scientist. If you are not BOINCing now, I must ask why not?
Tablet PCS in your desktop?
Not dead by a long shot
My Thoughts...
A mobile device is nice of course, but unless it has a REALLY good warranty, accident coverage, ETC., I don't want my computing to be 100% mobile.
Plus, the prices of mobile devices neeed to come WAY down before mobile computing becames a true reality.