Microsoft to start providing 'limited troubleshooting' for unsupported service packs

By | April 13, 2010, 9:02am PDT

Under a new support policy, Microsoft will begin providing limited break/fix troubleshooting to customers running unsupported service packs.

Microsoft officials announced the new service pack (SP) support policy on April 13 via the company’s Support Lifecycle blog.

Via the new policy — which Microsoft instituted based on customer and partner feedback over the past few years, according to the post — customers will be able to obtain support in the following manner:

1. Break/fix support incidents will be provided through Microsoft Customer Service and Support; and through Microsoft’s managed support offerings (such as Premier Support).

2. There will be no option to engage Microsoft’s product development resources, and technical workarounds may be limited or not available.

3. If the support incident requires escalation to development for further guidance, requires a hotfix, or requires a security update, customers will be asked to upgrade to a supported service pack.

Under the previous service-pack support policy, once a service pack reached the end of support, customers couldn’t get any troubleshooting help from Microsoft unless they upgraded to a supported service pack. They weren’t allowed to get telephone support, security updates or non-security hot fixes, period. This end of support date comes after a period of free support, followed by a period of paid support (the time periods of which vary for different Microsoft products).

The ultimate goal, even with the new policy, is to get users to move to a supported service pack. As company officials noted in the blog post, “Staying on a supported service pack is the only way to ensure that you get continued access to security updates and the ability to escalate your support issues within Microsoft.”

Meanwhile, a quick reminder for those who are still running the RTM version of Windows Vista that support from Microsoft ends today (April 13). The end-of-support deadline does not apply to those running Vista with Service Pack (SP) 1 or SP2 installed.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 25 years for a variety of publications and Web sites, and is a frequent guest on radio, TV and podcasts, speaking about all things Microsoft-related. She is the author of Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft plans to stay relevant in the post-Gates era (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Disclosure

Mary-Jo Foley

Freelance journalist/blogger Mary Jo Foley has nothing to disclose. WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get). I do not own Microsoft stock or stock in any of its partners or competitors. I have no business ventures that are sponsored by/funded by Microsoft or any of its partners or competitors.

Biography

Mary-Jo Foley

Mary Jo Foley has covered the tech industry for 25 years for a variety of publications, including ZDNet, eWeek and Baseline. She has kept close tabs on Microsoft strategy, products and technologies for the past 10 years. In the late 1990s, she penned the award-winning "At The Evil Empire" column for ZDNet, and more recently the Microsoft Watch blog for Ziff Davis.

Got a tip? Send her an email with your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. Confidentiality guaranteed.

4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft to start providing 'limited troubleshooting' for unsupported service packs
littlecherry 3rd Jun 2010
This gives companies another option. Most companies require rigorous testing before moving to a new service pack, so it's not always convenient to move to a new SP when they have a problem. sexy lingerie
0 Votes
+ -
good policy update
ITLeader 13th Apr 2010
This gives companies another option. Most companies require rigorous testing before moving to a new service pack, so it's not always convenient to move to a new SP when they have a problem.
Why wouldn't anybody want to upgrade to a supported service pack? Perhaps your forum here can develop that list from real-life examples? How legitimate, actually, are the reasons on this list? This could be an interesting discussion.
how about these for some real life reasons;
> sometimes service packs break Software,
> most times service packs break customizations,
- when I updated my main production systems to SP3 I had to go back through the group policy, security policy, & services to fix the customized settings & services that were reverted to the install default "here I am attack me" settings

> sometimes service packs break the whole system,
- how many blue screen reboot loop XP systems were there when SP1, SP2 & SP3 were released?
- or blue screen reboot loop vista systems were there when SP1 was released?
> sometimes the hardware can't handle the next SP
- how many P3 systems running XP-SP2 were toasted when they were updated to SP3
- how many P2 systems are running XP and really should still be running win2K
- I have 2 Celeron-II systems here with win2K on them and they run fine, if I tried to install XP they'd be toast because win2k is happy with 512MB RAM but XP is a pig until it has at least 1024MB RAM
- I have a client who can't afford new hardware and is running a Celeron-II 667MHz system with XP SP2 and it take 10 minutes to boot, and the HDD thrashes the whole time the system is on, and to access email it's even slower than a terminal server on wireless, because it's only got 256MB RAM and can't be upgraded to 512MB because when 512MB is installed it goes BSOD and won't ever boot

There isn't a system here that can run vista or 7, the highest I can go with anything here is XP but that's only 2 systems
the rest are on win2k SP4
but also the XP systems can't have IE 7 or 8 because IE 7 & 8 will break the production software.
This gives companies another option. Most companies require rigorous testing before moving to a new service pack, so it's not always convenient to move to a new SP when they have a problem. sexy lingerie

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix